similar to: Error: (22, ''Invalid argument'')

Is anyone successfully and stably using linux 2.6.16.27 or 2.6.16.28 or 2.6.16.29 with xen 3.0.2-2 package? regards Tomasz -- GPG key fingerprint: 3883 B308 8256 2246 D3ED A1FF 3A1D 0EAD 41C4 C2F0 GPG public key availabe on pgp.mit .edu keyserver _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, As most of you probably already know, a local root exploit was released yesterday which affects kernels from 2.6.17 to 2.6.24.1. Is there an official patch for dom0 and domU kernels, or can the backport of the official kernel patch be used on these kernels? Regards, Zoltan HERPAI _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi; While using xen-3.0.2 with 2.6.16.28 kernel CPU (Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz) temprature is inreasing up to 104 C (/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/trip_points reports 105 C is critical for CPU) while idle or no domU working with very low system load, and if i start to use domU, sometimes system freezes or reboots for heat. But the same kernel just without Xen works normally and

Hello All I just recently adopted a server with Gentoo/Xen as domain0 server with several domainUs attached to it. Please forgive my xen-noobness, but I was hoping that someone can help me out. These images have not been updated in a long time, and I''m trying to get all the domainUs updated with their appropriate services patches, etc. I''m currently working on one Gentoo

Hi; Attached patch adds "-Wno-always-true" CFLAGS into xen/arch/powerpc/Rules.mk and xen/arch/x86/Rules.mk, else compiling xen with latest gcc-4.2.0 snapshot fails, patch is against current xen-3.0.4-testing repo; make[3]: Entering directory `/var/pisi/xen-3.0.4.1-3/work/xen-3.0.4-testing.hg/xen/common'' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -std=gnu99 -Wall

Hi; After updating our Xen packages to current tip of xen-3.1-testing (from 3.1.0) caglar@zangetsu xen-3.1-testing.hg $ hg tip changeset: 15634:dbe47d8cb825 tag: tip user: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com> date: Thu Jan 31 10:07:57 2008 +0000 summary: Added tag RELEASE-3.1.3 for changeset 4835d702ba6133849bfae64b783b755c5066c094 I cannot boot domU''s

Folks, A new release candidate for 3.2.0 has just been checked into the xen-unstable tree. It''s available from staging and will be in the main tree when it has passed internal regression tests. Meanwhile, in preparation for 3.1.3, please let me know if there are any further patches from xen-unstable that should be backported into the 3.1 branch. You can pull the xen-3.1-testing.hg

Hi All; I can''t find any related discussion on list archives so i just want to learn could anybody tell me is there any specific reason not to upgrade xen-3.0.4-testing tree to for example 2.6.16.38 which fixes dozens of security related problems after .33, i know as a distro packager its my responsibility to sync/modify whatever is needed but as an end-user perspective i just want

Hi; After upgrading to current xen-3.0.4-testing.hg domU''s starts to not working as expected, here are the some findings; * dom0 boot without a problem * xend starts without a problem * As soon as "xm create domain", domain enters a blocked state and never returns (nothing changes if i use old 3.0.3-domU kernel or new one) * dmesg, xen dmesg, xen logs shows nothing strange *

Hi, I''m trying to verify that the Xen I''m running is patched against the all the known published bugs. I''m running Fedora 7, which means I''m running Xen 3.1.2. I''ve checked the changelog in the Fedora package, and I can verify that all the bugs I''ve found are fixed except for one. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27219

Hi all, I got few servers to make xen nodes, to evaluate maybe other virtualisation and different xen configurations... I don`t know match about benchmarking, I was wondering what and how to test properly Dom0 and DomU performance on different servers... If somebody is interested in results I can publish them... thanx, Casper _______________________________________________ Xen-users

Hello everybody, I've my Gentoo's /usr/portage on a loopback btrfs. Just wanted to sync and got an oops. I've a rsync and a ls process in status D now. The system has been in suspend (tuxonice 3.0-rc3) with mounted btrfs, perhaps that is related? Dec 7 19:18:38 revo BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c Dec 7 19:18:38 revo printing

Hello all; I am trying to create SuSE10 guest under my FC5 host, this configuration has worked before but due to abnormal shutdown of my server i get the following error while trying to create the guest OS; ** the same configuration *used to* work just fine *#xm create -c /etc/xen/suse.cfg* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using config file

I''m pleased to announce the availability of Xen 3.1.1 -- a bugfix release in the Xen 3.1 series. Many bugs, large and small, are fixed by this release and we recommend that all users and vendors upgrade. The source repository is available using mercurial from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg Binary packages have not yet been prepared for this release. Thanks to

I''m pleased to announce the availability of Xen 3.1.1 -- a bugfix release in the Xen 3.1 series. Many bugs, large and small, are fixed by this release and we recommend that all users and vendors upgrade. The source repository is available using mercurial from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg Binary packages have not yet been prepared for this release. Thanks to

Folks, The patch queue for 3.1.1 has been pushed into http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg, and tagged as -rc1. Please try it out and let us know of any problems (patches gladly accepted!). -- Keir PS. The patch queue (xen-3.1-testing.pq.hg) is no longer being used. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

http://www.xensource.com/xen/downloads/index.html The XenSource site seems to think so but I haven''t seen an announcement here. Is rc4 tag the same changeset for 3.0.3? Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Does anyone know if the Xen 3.1.0 kernels as distributed in the "open source" tarballs (x86_64 version) are vulnerable to the recently-announced vulnerability CVE-2007-4573? IF so, is there any plan to release patched tarballs anytime soon? Thanks Steve Timm -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 timm@fnal.gov

The python3 bindings create unicode objects from application strings on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages). It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be utf8 encoded - however in some cases they are not a valid unicode string, on SLES11 SP4 the following packages fail to be converted to unicode using guestfs_int_py_fromstring() (which invokes

Dear Group, I'm having lots of problems getting RMySQL on a 64 bit machine. I followed all instructions available but couldn't get it working yet! Please help. See the output below. I did a install of RMySQL binary from the revolution cran source. It seems to have unpacked fine but gives this error when I call RMySQL Error: package 'RMySQL' is not installed for 'arch=x64'