Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Fsck failure <- missing /dev/ entries"
2001 Mar 01
1
Problems converting rootfs to ext3
Hi,
i am having problems converting the rootfs - I created a journal and booted
with "rw rootflags=journal=<inode>" - Before i changes the fstab and put
the WIP fsck to /sbin/fsck.ext3. The kernel seems to mount the filesystem
ok and then the bootup scripts (debian potato) try to fsck the rootfs
which leads to
e2fsck 1.20-WIP, 17-Jan-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
JFS DEBUG:
2020 May 28
2
Recover from an fsck failure
This is CentOS-6x.
I have cloned the HDD of a CentOS-6 system. I booted a host with that drive
and received the following error:
checking filesystems
/dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_root: clean, 128491/4096000 files, 1554114/16304000
blocks
/dev/sda1: clean, 47/120016 files, 80115/512000 blocks
/dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_home: clean, 7429/204800 files, 90039/819200 blocks
2017 Mar 18
1
Centos-6.8 fsck and lvms
I have a CentOS-6.8 system which has a suspected HHD failure. I have
booted it into rescue mode from a CentOS-6.5 minimal install CD in
order to run fsck -c on it. The system hosts several vms. I have
activated the lvs associated with these vm using pvscan -s ; vgscan ;
vgchange -ay. An lvscan shows the lvs as ACTIVE. None are mounted.
When I try to run fsck on any of them I see the
2006 Apr 16
2
e2fsck dies with signal 11
Hi
I got a strange error, happening on two of my ext3 partitions.
What can be wrong? And why does e2fsck error out, instead of displaying
an error message?
Best regards
keld
fsck /dev/hda6
fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
Warning... fsck.ext3 for device /dev/hda6 exited with signal 11.
also From my dmesg:
<1>general protection fault: e7a8 [#3]
Modules linked in:
2002 May 20
5
A solution to Kernel Panic ... on ext3 only!
Here I don't want to start a discussion, but rather share a *solution*
that took me some days to come up with.
The whole stuff started with a power-outage. After reboot, my server
(ext3) came back with the dreaded file system error (Ctrl-D to reboot or
password for maintenance) - if you've never seen this, consider yourself
lucky!
In any case, I did the fsck as prescribed, but abandoned
2013 Aug 30
0
Re: Strange fsck.ext3 behavior - infinite loop
On 2013-08-29, at 7:48 PM, Richards, Paul Franklin wrote:
> Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list?
>
> After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop restarting
2006 Sep 11
1
Virtual ethernet problem
Hi all!
I''m quite new to this, so...
I''ve set up dom0 and one domU so far. Because of several reasons i need to
have some virtual networks:
+ -- eth0 of domU1
eth0 -- ?? -- xenintbr0 -- +
xenintbr1 -- +
xenintbr2 -- +
eth0 is 10.2.0.9
xenintbr0 is 10.10.0.1 (netmask /29)
xenintbr1 is 10.11.0.1 (netmask /16)
xenintbr2 is
2013 Aug 30
2
Strange fsck.ext3 behavior - infinite loop
Greetings! Need your help fellow penguins!
Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list?
After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop restarting itself and then trying to correct
2002 Oct 24
1
signal 11 on fsck
System info:
------------
[root@angel root]# cat /etc/issue
Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma)
Kernel \r on an \m
[root@angel root]# uname -a
Linux angel 2.4.9-34 #1 Sat Jun 1 06:25:16 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
This problem occured after upgrade to kernel 2.4.18-17.7, backed out to
previous version now (2.4.9-34). All other system RPMs are up to date
according to RHN, and nothing, aside from
2010 Jul 21
4
Fsck on mdraid array
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
systems, and try to run
fsck -y /dev/md0
fsck -y /dev/md1
fsck -y /dev/md2
For each try I get an error message:
2003 Jun 13
1
fsck fails (then succeeds)
Hello,
This may be a slightly rambling and inexpert question from
point of view of the learned folks on this list - feel free
to go and read something more interesting, but I am curious
and a little alarmed about a recent event.
I am running Linux from Scratch ("LFS"), under a locally
compiled Kernel 2.4.20 (SMP). The root filsytem was created
as ext2 and converted to ext3 with an
2006 Dec 01
1
maintain 6TB filesystem + fsck
i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and
tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html
i am reading lots of ext3 links like......
http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html
http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html
............but
2006 Oct 31
0
4775289 fsck reports wrong state in superblock if there once has existed a largefile
Author: jkennedy
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: 931f9f0e5d2fb0b5da5bc6c0f77c10e668f842cf
Log message:
4775289 fsck reports wrong state in superblock if there once has existed a largefile
6302747 Performance regression when deleting large files from a logging ufs filesystem
6362734 df output corrupt after under heavy stress
Files:
update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/fsck/utilities.c
update:
2009 Nov 20
1
fsck.btrfs assertion failure with large number of disks in fs
Hello all
We are experimenting with btrfs and we''ve run into some problems.
We are running on two Sun Storage J4400 Arrays containing a total of
48 1 TB disks.
With 24 disks in the btrfs:
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sd[b-y]
WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
adding device /dev/sdc id 2
...
adding device /dev/sdy id 24
fs
2001 Oct 19
1
What was wrong with this sequence?
I thought I understood things, but I guess not. I recently configured a new
system for a colleague as follows:
1. Redhat 7.1 install Dell Inspiron 8100 - three partitions on 30G - /,
/boot, swap
2. Boot up
3. configure, make, make install of linux-2.4.12-ac3 (with approriate lilo
changes) lilo (but no reboot until 8)
4. rpm -U mount-2.11g-5.i386.rpm (from rawhide)
2001 Dec 04
2
journal file exists but feature missing
Hi,
I tried to convert my root partition from an ext2 to ext3 fs using tune2fs.
I'm running a 2.4.10 kernel with ext3 support, but the partition is not
mounted ext3. In fact the journal feature is missing from the superblock:
# cat /proc/filesystems | grep ext
ext3
ext2
# tune2fs -l /dev/hda6 | grep features
Filesystem features: filetype sparse_super
# ls -l /.journal
2006 Sep 10
6
xen & vmware
Hi all!
Anyone tried to install vmware on a xen system (ie. vmware player on dom0?).
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2001 Jul 07
2
broken ext3 fs after "poweroff" ext3 0.0.7a/2.2.19 wip 1.21
Hi,
after my X froze i had a fs inconsistency after the journal replay
[...]
EXT3-fs: 03:06: 1 orphan inode deleted
EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 64k freed
INIT: version 2.78 booting
Loading /etc/console-tools/default.kmap.gz
Activating swap...
Adding Swap: 264560k
2015 May 25
2
fsck failing to notice that the block device was pulled out from under it?
Hello,
tl;dr: it seems like fsck fails to notice when the block device
disappears from under it.
I have the following setup:
* external USB disk
* a partition with LUKS in it
* ext4 filesystem inside the LUKS block device
While doing backups to it I noticed that after some time backups would
fail with an error (failed to write, ).
In the following log I'm attaching the disk, enabling LUKS
2009 Oct 23
3
reset par() within plot layout
Dear list,
I would like to produce a matrix of plots, where par() is reset after
each plot (see below [simplified] example). When I use layout() to do
so, I seem to also reset the layout. I have not been able to figure out
how to prevent this from happening.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Janke
Example code:
#Desired result is a layout of 2 plots: one red and one black
layout(matrix(1:2,