similar to: 0.2.0 worker/slave creation

Hi , How do i schedule a job that can send emails at intervals of time using backgroundrb and rails For testing When i hit the controller i''m able send the emails. but that is not i intend to do ..... I want to use backgroundrb and rails in which i''ll schedule a job for every 5 minutes/ 1 minute or so..... to send an email But when i write

Hi gang, Thanks to other help I''ve gotten on this list, I''ve got backgroundrb up and running using postgres alongside my rails app. I''ve designed the system to have several eternally-running workers that periodically poll the database to see if there''s any work for them to do, and set things up in the config file to make them restart quickly if any of them

I''ve been trying unsuccessfully for the better part of today to write a worker that can use by ActiveRecord model classes. The bizarre thing is that worker just stops at the point accessing the database connection. An exception isn''t raising, it just dies. My worker class is below, I''ve interspersed log messages throughout to try to determine where it is dying. =====

I'm setting up a PDC using samba 3.0.14a-2 on fedora 4 with Openldap 2.2.23 to authenticate. Authentication via ldap through the various linux service is working (login, ssh, etc.) via nss. Thus I know that slapd is running and working properly. I used smbldap-tools to populate and add test users/groups to the directory, and they worked just fine. But samba, despite being configured

I''m running the latest backgroundrb mainly for scheduled tasks support. As per the documentation I created the backgroundrb_schedules.yml with the following: simple_label: :class: :document_sorter_worker :worker_method: :do_work :job: :bleh :trigger_args: :start: <%= Time.now + 5.seconds %> :end: <%= Time.now + 10.minutes :repeat_interval: 1.minute Under

Hi, I''m using backgroundrb 0.2.1 in a production environment and for most parts I''m very happy. We are using it to do some heavy video editing on the server side and it works great except that under, what seems heavy load the below problem happens intermittently. The problem has only happened 5 times out of over 500 runs by our backgroundrb worker. This is the code in our

Hi, I''m trying to convert an app to use 0.2.0, and having a little trouble understanding how to use the results hash. Formerly my worker had an instance variable, @file_stats which was initialized to an empty hash; I have replaced @file_stats with results[:file_hash]. Actually my initial pass at this was just to do a s/@file_stats/results[:file_hash]/. Which gets me the following:

Hello Folks- I am really happy to announce the release of BackgrounDRb 0.2.0 . This is a complete rewrite and re-architecture of this codebase. I want to thank skaar for all of his hard work. I put out a call for help with the new architecture and skaar stepped up bigtime. I had already written the new scheduler and cron compatible syntax and moved to multi process architecture. But he

Hi, I''m not much of a developer but I''ve been using backgroundrb for a while now and with the release of 0.2.1 it looks like I can finally upgrade from the old version (0.2.0 had some weird issues when jobs just wouldn''t run, seems to have cleared up now - Thanks!). Anyhow, while I''m doing this, I would like to tackle this problem. Most tasks I run in

Hi -- Just trying to get started with backgroundrb 0.2.0 after having glanced at an earlier version and thought "cool, I''ll definitely need this later." I notice that the old sample config file has the following in it: acl: deny: all allow: localhost 127.0.0.1 order: deny,allow I''m not seeing this in the sample configuration in the current README, though, and

Hi Ezra/skaar, Wow man, the exercise was worth it. The connection closed problem with socket as i mentioned in my earlier mails...completely disappeared, and now i can connect only once to the socket and keep reading..till end of its days. Literally impossible with older release of backgroundrb. This could also potentially solve the issues people were having with ActiveRecord. As i said

Hello all, i just started using backgroundrb and i really like it a lot so far. I finally succeeded in setting up version 0.21 and the examples from the readme run fine. Now i do not want to create and delete my worker anytime i want it to do something but call repeatedly a method with arguments. There is a arg_method defined in the readme so i guess this is a feasible way to procede.

The new backgroundrb seemed to me to be markedly slower than the old one. So, I ran a "side-by-side" comparison test using a worker that I had written which parses a CSV file and loads the results into a database. The results? The latest version appears to take twice as long to run the same code as the previous version. Has anyone else experienced speed issues with the new

Hi, I''m using backgroundrb to get RSS feeds and pass them back to the controller. I''m using the Ruby RSS library to parse the feed, which returns an RSS object. After that I pass the object into the results hash, but that''s when this error occurs. Basically, this is what I have: rss = RSS::Parser.parse(response.body) results[:feed] = rss # error! 20061120-15:46:19

Hi there, Backgroundrb is working pretty well for me but I have a job that launches two of the same job, apparently a minute(?) apart from each other. Should this be happening if I have repeat interval enabled with a job_key? It seems like it should wait until the job is finished before launching a new instance. --Backgroundrb_schedules.yml-- city_updater: :class: :city_updater_worker

Hi I just tried to move my project to rails 1.2.1 on my locomotive development setup. It seems that backgroundrb is not willing to start up anymore. If I switch locomotive back to 1.1.6, everthing is fine. This is the error I get while attempting to start backgroundrb: /Applications/Locomotive2/Bundles/standardRailsJan2007.locobundle/

I have the next including files structure : - controller fileaA.rb including line (#8): require "fileB"... - /lib/fileB.rb with main header: load ''backgroundrb/worker.rb'' load ''backgroundrb/ worker_rails.rb'' class FileB <

What are people are doing when they need to deploy a new code base? You can''t just restart backgroundrb, because then you lose any long-running backgroundrb processes. But then you''d conceivably have to wait several hours for all your procs to complete before pushing out the new code base. I was originally thinking that during code deploys, we''d start up a second

I am sure..again I am missing something, but I am trying to start a worker, when backgroundrb starts and it doesn''t seem to work. Here is my config/backgroundrb_schedules.yml file: feed_worker: class: feed_worker job_key: feed_worker_key worker_method: do_work trigger_args: repeat_interval: 20.minutes I even tried this from Rails controller: # def start_feed_worker #

Eric, think I came across an issue with the parser in unicorn, with a request (due to 2 layers of nginx proxying) coming across with both a X_FORWARDED_PROTO and a X-Forwarded-Proto header. From the socket (in HttpRequest) - we get: X_FORWARDED_PROTO: http X-Forwarded-Proto: https which is parsed to HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO"=>"http,https There was a passenger ticket that