similar to: Expected network throughput

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

Just reporting some iperf results. In each case, Dom0 is iperf server, DomU is iperf client: (1) Dom0: Intel Core2 3.16 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 1.17 Gbits/sec (2) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 725 Mbits/sec (3) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz,

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

would like some input on this one please. Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other. Both servers have the following setup: CentOS 5.5 x64 XEN 1GB NIC's 7200rpm SATA HDD's The hardware configuration can't change, I need to use these servers as they are. They are both used in production

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w

Hi List. First post, be gentle please. Is there any limit in the linux UDP rate? I am using linux kernel 2.6 and iperf to measure bandwidth between two endpoints connected by 100 Mbits ethernet. Running (as root) iperf -u -s and iperf -u -c always gives me 1.05 Mbits/seg even when runned in the same machine. Can somebody clarify this? Thanks in advance. Sebastian

Hello list, I have two differents installation Xen Hypervisor on two identical physical server, on the same switch : The problem is on my new server (Xen 4.0.1 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.24), I have bad performance on bandwidth I have test with a files copy and "iperf". Result iperf average: Transfert Bandwidth XEN-A -> Windows

Hi, We are running on 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL360 G6. Kernel version is 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 (we had also tested with the latest available kernel kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5.x86_64) We running some performance tests using the "iperf" utility. We are seeing very bad and inconsistent performance on the UDP testing. The maximum we could get, was 440 Mbits/sec, and it varies from 250 to 440

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hi, I am seeing a performance degradation while using libvirt to start my vm (kvm). vm is fedora 12 and host is also fedora 12, both with 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686. Here are the statistics from iperf : >From VM: [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 199 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec >From host : [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 331 MBytes 92.6 Mbits/sec libvirt command as seen from ps output : /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -S -M

Hello, My first post on Xen-Users, so .. i''ve discovered a strange problem. Setup: -A Windows server 2003R2 (x86) with GPL PV driver 0.9.9 ipferf 1.7.0 (from 2003) -dom0 a opensuse 11.0 xen: # rpm -q -a |grep -i xen kqemu-kmp-xen-1.3.0pre11_2.6.25.5_1.1-7.1 kiwi-desc-xenboot-2.38-67.1 xen-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2 xen-tools-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2 xen-libs-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2

Hi. I have 2 PC's connected with 1GBit NIC's. When I transfer a file from my File-Server(Redhat9.0, 256 SD-RAM, 300MHz PII, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD200JB RAID 0) to my Windows-PC(AMD Athlon XP 1800+, 1024 MB DDR-RAM, WINXP PRO, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD080JB RAID 0) with Samba, i get Speeds around 8-9MB/sec. I think this is too low for an GBit Network, so i tested the

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:33:58 -0700 xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > This patch improves the guest receive and transmit performance. > On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the > same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. > > We set the poll-us=100us and use the iperf3 to test Where/how do

Hi guys, I''m running a freenas domU (FreeBSD 8.3 based, ZFS v28, 2 vcpus mapped to the same HT capable core) to serve storage for all purpose including other domUs running on the same host. I did some study to understand how well it works and the result is kind of confusing. In summary, the network performance between domains on the same host is worse than expected. And NFS service to

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

Hello all, I''ve been trying to test HTB performance for different link bandwidths to find potential limits and this is what I have so far: http://home.comcast.net/~msethuraman/htbtest/ Can members please go over the setup, test procedure and the results and answer a few questions? 1. Is the testing methodology okay and can the results be considered accurate? If so, is this a decent

Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing significant performance degradation problems (from 100Mb/s down to 1Mb/s in the worst case) and I'm not sure how to fix this. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, iperf reports ~100Mb/s and rsync reports ~1Mb/s: $ iperf -c 91.224.149.132

On 12-03-2015 17:39, Digimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/03/15 04:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> A network engineer buddy of mine brought up for discussion with me >> that he'd like to do some throughput testing, but he's new to >> Linux/RedHat. Is there any software I can recommend to