similar to: Re: MTU limits?

Hi all, In a bridged setup, how we can set a large mtu(4k) for the interface on domU? Eventhough ''ifconfig eth4 mtu 4000'' command worked in my case, whether it reflect on the actual device? Moreover I can''t set mtu for the bridge as 4k. Setting any value above 1500 mtu shows the following error, xen-152:~ # ifconfig xenbr1 mtu 4000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument So

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Xen-users] network-bridge does not create veth or peth devices Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:42:25 +0100 From: Ingard Mevåg <ingardm@startsiden.no> Organization: ABCStartsiden To: Luciano Rocha <strange@nsk.no-ip.org> References: <474D6492.5030807@startsiden.no> <20071128130205.GA1838@bit.office.eurotux.com> Luciano Rocha

Hi all, I have been using tinc successfully for a while now. However, I need to do something different from my normal setup, and i am getting the feeling I am doing something obvious wrong. What I want to do is hookup 5 distant linux routers into one bigger network, Since I need to transmit both unicast and multicast traffic, the VPN network has to be in "Mode = switch" [Assumption

Hi I am trying to install xen (64bit) on a Dell PowerEdge 2900. The installation process was something like the following: ----- apt-get install iproute bridge-utils python-twisted binutils zlib1g-dev python-dev transfig bzip2 screen ssh debootstrap libcurl3-dev libncurses5-dev x-dev build-essential gettext python-pyopenssl python-pam python-xml latex tetex-extra tetex-base

Hello all, Not sure if I am completely missing something but here goes. I have XCP 1.0 running without any issues. I have the mtu set on both the storage network, the corresponding PIF, and the VIF to 9000 and when displayed in ifconfig it shows that this is indeed true. I have several CentOs 5.6 VMs running in HVM mode (i.e. no xen kernel) which attach to the the storage network through these

The first patch restricts passthrough parameters to ones matching "os-*". This was how it was documented, but not how it was implemented. The second patch is the same as v2 here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/msg00187.html Rich.

I am curious if there will be corresponding vif-create / vif-destroy commands to conicide with vbd-create and destory? Thanks, Pat -- Patrick O''Rourke porourke@egenera.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have a bridge that has gigabit interfaces. The machine in question has the fun job of being a Bridge, Firewall and SMB server. Both of the Gigabit interfaces are connected to workstations directly via Xover cable (well MDI-X to be exact). My question is, if I enable jumbo frames on the gigabit interfaces will that make any difference in overall transfer rate of the bridge? I was thinking it

Hi all, I've just upgraded my home network to a Linksys SRW2024 (with lovely vlan trunking support!) and I'm trying to enable jumbo frames. When I try to set the MTU of an rtl8169 based network card (it's a Netgear RA311), it comes up with an error stating: # ifconfig eth1 mtu 9000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument The only options it will take are 1500 or below. Does anyone know

I have a strange problem with VLANs with Xen 3.0.4. I signalled it on Xen-users list, but found no definitive solution to it. I configure VLANs so that they are available in dom0; domUs don''t know that they use VLANs. I use a stock "network-bridge" comming from Xen for setting up networking: #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge"

Hello *, I''m trying to setup Shorewall under Ubuntu 7.04 and Xen configured to use network-dummy instead of network-bridge (network-bridge seems to be buggy at the moment under Debian/Ubuntu). Is there a shorewall config example I can use in combination with network-dummy? In particular, with network-dummy there is no peth interface and the bridge include the real eth interface. I

Hi listmembers, not a really urgent question, but i''m just curious about it: Is it advised to use an irqbalanced on dom0 when running domU''s pinned to particular cores? as an example, i''ve got a dual quadcore xen system running with domU pinned to cores 1-3 (CPU#0) domU pinned to cores 4-5 (CPU#1) domU pinned to cores 6-7 (CPU#1) so dom0 should have 100% time on

Hi, I am using the latest unstable and when I boot my xen, I do not see any veth devices. This happens even after I start xend. Xend gives this message on a "xend start" SIOCSIFNAME : Device or resource busy Presumably the creation of veth and peth is failing because of this. Any suggestions -Padma _______________________________________________

Hi, the docs suggest to use firewalling in Dom0. I have a question: Dom0 sees al the interfaces, not just those considered its "own" ones. So should I set up firewalling to use/protect only Dom0''s own interfaces, leaving individual firewalls to DomUs, or should I set up firewalling on the physical interfaces (peth*)? To make things a bit worse I'' using bonding,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a *very* strange problem, unfortunately it's kind of a show stopper regarding the deployment of the machine. :( I have two Intel Gigabit Ethernet NICs on board (Supermicro-based Server), quoting lspci (full output see at the end of the email): 0d:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573E Gigabit Ethernet Controller

I don''t know if there was a problem in the archive or not, I just wanted to link to this post of mine, but I could not find it in the archive. So here''s a re-post. -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [Xen-users] Xen, NIC bonding, ARP problem Datum: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:05:45 +0200 Von: Dominik Klein <dk@in-telegence.net> An: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Hi

Hi, I have a problem with networking under XEN, I hope someone can help me out. The problem is that after some time (a day or so) the network suddenly stops working, and it takes some waiting and/or a reboot to fix this. I''m running XEN 3.1.0-rc7 on an Intel Core2 (x86_64). It''s a Fedora 8 system, with the following packages: o Xen version 3.1.0-rc7-2950.fc8

Hello. I''m new to the list and I hope this is not a FAQ. I searched the archives and didn''t find an answer... Quick question : Is there a limitation if the vif code cutting at 1500 bytes ?? I''m trying to implement an IPv6 router/Firewall (2 XenU) Xen 2.0.6, Linux 2.6 is used on xen0 and XenU. The physical machine has 2 interfaces, eth0 (which is connected to an

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

Hi I reached the conclusion that my networking problem stems from the fact that I have no peth0 device. I''m trying to locate what creates the device, but until now no success. So I have a simple question: What creates the peth0 device in dom0? TIA Paolo _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com