similar to: hdlc0 interface support needed!

My bad, try curl -s --user etc etc etc... I suppose that'd help. :] On 13 Oct 2004 at 13:02, Dave St John wrote: > > Here is the error i get now. > > [root@mc1 gork]# curl --useruser:pass > 'http://64.62.252.140:9120/admin/metadata?mount=/live.ogg&mode=updinfo&song=test_name+te > st_Title' > <b>source will not accept URL updates</b> >

Let this be a note for everyonein the future then. When using mp3s i don't think there is a --enable-mp3-updates (I think it worked by default for me), yet if using ogg vorbis you must compile icecast2 with --enable-vorbis-updates in order to update the song/title id3 metadeta (Instructions on how to do so with `curl' are below). If I was using ogg I may have been of more use, yet I

You did not type the exact string I told you to first of all. You forgot to use the 's after before the h in http and at the end. curl --user admin:hackme 'http://192.168.0.1:8000/admin/metadata?mount=/live&mode=updinfo&song=Artist_name+Title' notice the useage of the 's in my string and not in yours. Your string is launching nonsense into the background via the two

Please paste exact output and syntax On 1 Oct 2004 at 15:08, Dave St John wrote: > We tried curl but got an error saying an extra method is not available? > ideas? > > > Dave St John > Mediacast1 Administration > > Need Support ? > http://mediacast1.com/helpdesk > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cody Tubbs (wISPdirect)"

I currently have 3 mountpoints, 128, 56 and 24. I'm using darkice as the source and I'm relaying to another server running icecast2. I'm assuming that darkice is using lame for transcoding the bit-rates on the fly and sending 128k/s + 56k/s + 24k/s to the relay host... which is using a lot of bandwidth on the source network (which I don't have much to spare). Is there any

Run this from command line: curl --user admin:hackme 'http://192.168.0.1:8000/admin/metadata?mount=/live&mode=updinfo&song=Artist_name+Title' That should set you all up, just change IP, Port and MountPoint. -- Cody Tubbs : (Certified Master Linux Administrator) : (Certified Unix Security Specialist) -- Broadway Internet On 1 Oct 2004 at 12:15, Dave St John wrote: >

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

hi: my box use eth0 connect my pc. but I type command "./brctl showmacs br0", no mac addr display and the" brctl showmacs program" not exit,always exec # ./brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000123456789 no eth0 hdlc0 # ./brctl showmacs br0

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

I can’t seem to find info about layer 2 tinc tap interface bridge with local physical nic. I have successfully created two nodes configuration with tinc acting as switch. My problem is ethernet packets only flow between two nodes and not to hosts on bridged nic. Example: Server 1 - eth0 bridged with tinc tap device, then bridge gets IP via dhcp server on physical nic subnet. Server 2 - local

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

Hello, I have been using the bridging facilities provided by Linux (vanilla 2.6.7 SMP with UML skas host patch applied) to bridge a regular physical ethernet network (on interface eth0) with a virtual network (on interface tap0, cf uml_switch, http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/networking.html). A couple of virtual machines (run using user-mode linux, a tool that enables you to run linux

I need some help in understanding libvirt's virtual networking. I have configured bridged networking (shared physical device) on libvirt+KVM system which is working fine. Also, I am using default NAT network on with virbr0 bridge device and virbr0-nic. I would like to get better understanding on virbr0-nic works in this virtual network configuration. I understand that traffic from virbr0

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX

any comments? if nothing else, is there any way to atomically setup bridge? not on list, please cc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:08:15 -0000 From: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: Adam Sulmicki <adam@cfar.umd.edu>, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] nfsroot and brige > hello, > it seems like a catch-22 to

Dear tinc community, I am using tinc in switch mode. I have three nodes. Two nodes reside on routers, vpn-eth is bridged with internal lan, each router has several machines connected to it's internal lan. Third node is the roadwarrior - "endpoint" linux PC. When the roadwarrior is off - everything works perfectly, machines on both sides can communicate without a problem in any

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

There are two Linux routers, a 64K leased line is used to connect these two machines. Now, we would like to run Voice over IP between two machines. We have to run QoS and tag voice packet''s TOS field, otherwise, the voice quality is terrible if we transfer file and make voice call at the same time. I am not familiar with tc in Linux. But I have copied a script from LARTC archives. If