similar to: state of ia64 and/or Altix?

Hi All, I am looking for information on when CentOS 5 will be available for IA64. I found this forum posting but no responses http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8714&forum=45 I am looking to perform a large migration of about 500 workstations from various Suse and Red Hat versions to CentOS to standardize some what. Because I have to support x86 (32 & 64) and

I have a SGI Altix 350 (ia64) that came with RHAS 4, but without any paid support. I would like to migrate the server over to CentOS. Here is what I've pieced together from some older posts by Johnny, can someone confirm this should work? I know this is somewhat covered in the FAQ, although both entries refer to FC or WBEL, which already have built-in yum support. Install the

When I was trying to compile R-1.9.1 from source, I've got problems which seemed related to compiling the LAPACK package. The error message is as follows: gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o libRlapack.so dlamc.lo dlapack0.lo dlapack1.lo dlapack2.lo dlapack3.lo cmplx.lo -lblas -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-redhat-linux/2.96 -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-redhat-linux/2.96/../../.. -lg2c

Hi All, I have been able to successfully CentOS 4.5 on a SGI Altix 450 with 8P and 12GB of RAM. When at the EFI prompt I had to boot with the following parameters elilo linux text console=ttySG0,38400n8 The installation is still going so I'll let you know if it boots after install

On 5/19/2015 10:54 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > And that one drives me nuts. It breaks PXE boot kickstart builds. Maybe > *you* have all same model systems from the same manufacturer; we've got > boxen from...<thinking> at least five or six manufacturers, of varying > ages, from the 10+ yr old Altix 3000 from SGI, to the current one from > SGI, to my 5 yr old Dell

On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things >> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the >> opposite with RHEL where

I am trying to install R onto an Altix system running SuSE Enterprise Linux 9 SP3 with SGI ProPack 4 SP3. I end up with this error no matter what I try. Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated! ----- gcc -shared -L/opt/local/lib -o methods.so do_substitute_direct.o init.o methods_list_dispatch.o slot.o class_support.o tests.o ../../../../library/methods/libs/methods.so is

On 5/19/2015 10:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 May 2015 11:40, <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> >> Or if you want a bigger hammer: >> >> systemctl disable NetworkManager.service >> systemctl enable network.service >> systemctl stop NetworkManager.service >> systemctl start network.service >> >> The above will disable

Apologies for any obtuseness in the following. We have been working on Version 2.0 of the randomSurvivalForest CRAN package and we're encountering a perplexing 'memory not mapped' segfault that we believe is "influenced" by GC. We essentially have two R functions, rsf.default(..), and predict.rsf(..) and two corresponding entry points, rsfGrow(...), and rsfPredict(...),

On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>>> >>>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >>>>

Hello, I would like to know whether is possible to install R in a Itanium 64 bits computer. We cannot neither compile source code because we have Intel compilers. Specifically, we have an Intel Itanium II, Linux Red Hat 64 bits and Intel Fortran and C compilers: ifort, icc. Thanks -- jm~ ******************************** Juan Miguel Marin Diazaraque http://www.est.uc3m.es/jmmarin Dpto.

introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST, CONFIG_PARAVIRT for paravirtualized guest. introduce CONFIG_XEN, CONFIG_IA64_XEN_GUEST for xen. Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at hp.com> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at intel.com> --- arch/ia64/Kconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST, CONFIG_PARAVIRT for paravirtualized guest. introduce CONFIG_XEN, CONFIG_IA64_XEN_GUEST for xen. Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at hp.com> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at intel.com> --- arch/ia64/Kconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If there's any

In "Understanding the Linux Kernel" 3rd edition, section 4.7 "Softirqs and Tasklets" it states: "Activation and execution [of defferable functions] are bound together: a deferrable function that has been activated by a given CPU must be executed on the same CPU. There is no self-evident reason suggesting that this rule is beneficial for system performance. Binding the

Hello there, I'd like to have iso image version for ultra sparc 64bit. Recently, I downloaded centos version 4.2 beta iso image and installed on SunUltra sparc 64 bit machine. It was hang when it went to the screen " the CentOS 4.2 beta screen, <Tab>/<Alt tab> | <Space> selects | <F12> next screen ". Any idea? Please help. Thanks in advance. Amy on your

Hi * Trying to get drive-backup command, getting permission denied. :( sudo virsh qemu-monitor-command --hmp my-instance --cmd drive_backup drive-virtio-disk0 /tmp/foo.vda.img Looks like apparmor issue. What can I modify to make this work ? * Couple of other questions drive-backup : * The doc seems to claim that it gives a point in time copy of

On 04/01/2015 08:12 PM, Always Learning wrote: > 1. What is the logically reason for this alleged "improvement" ? I never said it was an improvement. I just said that I didn't think it was that big of a deal, and it boggles my mind that people are calling a change of an ISO's file name 'unwise' and even comparing it to a Microsoft move. I just don't see it as

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:08:41PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/14/2014 11:52 AM, Jd wrote: > > Hi > > > > * Trying to get drive-backup command, getting permission denied. :( > > > > sudo virsh qemu-monitor-command --hmp my-instance --cmd > > drive_backup drive-virtio-disk0 /tmp/foo.vda.img > > Ouch. qemu-monitor-command is explicitly

With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the point release. What is the case with users on this list who support both? Thanks, Joseph L. Casale