similar to: I want to stick my models in a module

I''m trying to use composed_of within my model. I have a field in my database named ''card1'', which is simply a string. I have this in my model class Player < ActiveRecord::Base composed_of :card1, :class_name => ''Card'' end class Card attr_reader :value, :suit def initialize(s) @value = s[0].chr @suit = s[1].chr end end The

Yesterday I was having problems getting fixtures to load correctly after moving my models into separate modules. Wrote a patch for fixtures and all was fine. Then I put my app into production mode. I''ve got two classes named Player. HHConv::Player and Trainer::Player. Rails seems to only care about the Player class that first gets loaded in, even if I name them explicitly using the

I''m writing a simple app that doesn''t need to use a database. I added :active_record to the config.frameworks -= line in environment.rb file. This lets me run ./script/generate fine without complaining about no connection. However if I try to run a functional test, it complains about no connection being established. Well...I don''t want a connection to be established.

I have several plain ruby classes that do nothing but implement algorithms. What is the prefferred way to run these w/out making a DB connection every time? Thanks, Dennis Byrne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060724/5ff610dd/attachment.html

Hi guys, I have the strangest thing happening. The funny part is its doing exactly what I want to do, I just don''t understand how. Basically here is my model. class Role < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :users has_and_belongs_to_many :rights def self.names names = Array.new() for role in Role.find :all names << role.name end return

All, If I do ruby script/generate model blah, is there an easy way for me to remove all of that stuff that got generated? Something like: ruby script/remove model blah? If it doesn''t exist, is it coming? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

describe Asset, " when destroyed" do fixtures :assets, :videos, :sites, :publish_settings before(:each) do @asset = assets(:test_asset) @mock_hook = mock("hook") @asset.video.stub!(:hook).and_return @mock_hook # error occurs here end it "should call the delete hook" do @mock_hook.should_receive(:update).with("test_video",

I have a pretty simple model, articles and users. class Article belongs_to :user end class User has_many :articles end In my unit tests I want to ensure that the associations work properly. What''s the best way to do this? The obvious thing to do is a test in each model. # user_test.rb def test_add_post u = users(:first) before_articles = u.articles.count u.articles

This is sort of a pre-announcement for a Rails plugin my friend Adam Williams and I are working on. We''re in the process of extracting it from a project we are working on so that it can be generally useful to the Rails community. We are calling it "Scenarios". It is a drop in replacement for Rails fixtures: http://faithfulcode.rubyforge.org/svn/plugins/trunk/scenarios/README

As I work with Rails TestUnit tests I am reconsidering how to use cucumber features. It seems to me that it might be best to have a coherent view of how to arrange my test suites before I get much further into this. Now, so far I have considered three possibilities: 1. Use features exclusively. Create a feature file for each model, one for each controller and possibly an additional one for

I hope this isn''t too rambly. This is sort of a brain dump of a subject I''ve been thinking about for months as I''ve used RSpec. Let''s say we''ve got a simple query method, that will find all the users in the DB older than 18. Our model could look like class User < ActiveRecord::Base def self.find_older_than(age) find :all, :conditions =>

Hi! I''m developing a rails applicaton with specify-before approach, with nice results so far. I use mocks and stubs in both Controller and views tests, but the main issue is with model testing. Since I''ve seen many examples here and there, I don''t know if the right way is to use fixtures or not at all (in model specs). Atm, I''m using them, but I

I have been trying to throw away my dependence on Windoz since the early Pentium era, but there always seems to be some essential application that can't be replaced. Currently it is the programs that read my blood glucose meeter and an athletic trainer system. Both of them communicate through a serial port. I am currently working on getting the trainer going. It loads fine and has no

Hi, Anyone got any cool tricks for converting a Rails site (in this case, a typo installation) from a mysql database to a postgresql database? I''ve got it almost working -- I''m doing a SQL dump from mysql and loading it into postgres. However, mysql does booleans as a tinyint with 0 = false and 1 = true. When I try to import that into a postgres database that expects booleans

Hi all, I have a problem with unit test database data reload. I have several test_xxx function in my ruby unit test file I would like to know why xxxx.yml containing test data are load only 1 time for all the test while specification say it done for before each test method. Thus my test_xxx are dependant of previous test This is a mistake, because the specs say the test data are reload

Hi, I replaced the MMTk code with a C-version MMTk code (I have been working on such AOT compiler for a while). The compiler should deal with most of the MMTk code base correctly - at least I get marksweep running with a tiny client). So I am trying to put the C version MMTk back with VmKit. I tried not to change much existing code except where necessary, such as name mangling and MMTkObject

Sorry, lots of questions these days. Is there a normal approach for preconditions? In JUnit, I might put a few assertions in the setUp() just to make sure that the test ''data'' I''ve created meets expectations before going to test it. So, for instance, I''ve got an object that is audited using acts_as_audited and I''d like to test the XML that results

Hello, I've got a problem in a sql query! for(j in 1:length(criteria$Title)) { graphe_par<-sqlQuery(channel,"select q.type,crit.Title, r.Value from criteria crit, reply r,question_reply qr, question q, question_criteria qc, form_question fq where qr.reply=r.ID and qr.question=q.ID and qc.question=q.ID and crit.ID=qc.criteria and fq.question=q.ID and fq.form=4 and

hi, My code: data<-matrix(data=c(0.425,0.5,0.75,0.125,0.25,0.475,0.375,0.25,0.625,0.5,0.1,0.125,0,0.25,0.25),nrow=3,ncol=5,byrow=TRUE, dimnames=list(c("Good","Medium","Bad"),c("Content","Logistic","Trainer","Supply","User contribution"))) plot(corresp(data,nf=2),xlim=c(-1,1),ylim=c(-1,1)); The plot is

Hi Yi, The precompiler is in charge of translating the most common classes of the Java runtime library to llvm code (typically, java.lang.Object), in order to natively compile these classes and decrease the bootstrap time. So, if you have a segmentation fault at this stage, it means that you have broken something in the interface between MMTk and VMKit. If it can helps you: * during a first