similar to: Changing Xen hard memory limit in running domain

Hi, I''ve tried to search the list archives but I didn''t found anything about this and I''m experiencing some problems I need to solve quickly so here follows my question and related doubts. * The configuration I''ve an 8GB equipped with 2 dual core xeon cpus server running CentOS 5.1 (x64) and xen 3.0.3-41.el5 on kernel 2.6.18-53 I''m running 4 DomU

What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream projects ? I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX 4.1 support to things like virt-v2v ( http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00480.html) and the second fixes the broken "virsh snapshot-create" ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727709). All I did really was get them to

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:44:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html > There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++. > > Best regards, > --Edwin The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with another, presumably with enormous effort. The only hopeful sign in that thread is the

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:44:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html >> There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++. >> >> Best regards, >> --Edwin > > The sad thing is that they seem

I'm trying to install libvirt to /opt/libvirt, in order to test a patch I've worked into the current release, but it seems RPM is ignoring the --prefix command. The RPM I built has "Prefix: /opt/libvirt" in the spec, and correctly shows as relocatable by RPM... # rpm -qpi libvirt-0.8.1-27.el6.6.x86_64.rpm Name : libvirt Relocations: /opt/libvirt

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with > another, presumably with enormous effort. > > The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone > instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html > > But it is summarily

After fresh installation of CentOS 6.2 on my server, I get following errors in my dmesg output: ------- MTRR default type: uncachable MTRR fixed ranges enabled: 00000-9FFFF write-back A0000-BFFFF uncachable C0000-D7FFF write-protect D8000-E7FFF uncachable E8000-FFFFF write-protect MTRR variable ranges enabled: 0 base 000000000 mask C00000000 write-back 1 base 400000000 mask

Good Day All, Today I looked at the dmesg log and I notice that the following messages regarding mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size. I am currently running CentOS 6.3 and I installed CentOS 6.2 and 6.1 and I was seeing the same errors. When I installed CentOS 5.8 on the same laptop I do not see these errors. $ lsb_release -a LSB Version:

Hi, I have server that has been running 5.x - 5.8 for a few years without issue and decided to move it to a fresh install of 6.2. First thing I noticed is a good part of the log has these mtrr messages finally ending with "mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value" and "please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size". I have been searching around and reading the kernel docs

ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÏµÍâóÆóÒµ£¬ÓÐÒâÀ©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ££¬ÏëÔÚ¹óµØÑ°ÕÒºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬Ìؽ«´Ë¼ÛÄ¿±íÌṩ¸øÄú·½²Î¿¼£¬ÎÒ¹«Ë¾±£Ö¤²úƷΪȫÐÂÔ­×°Èý¸öÔ°ü»»Ò»Äê°üÐÞÈý°ü£¬±£Ö¤ÐÅÓþ£¬»õµ½¸¶¿î £¬²»ÏêÊÂÒËÄú¿ÉÀ´ÈËÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯£¡ÈçÓдòÈÅ£¬Çë¶à°üº­£¡£¡£¡ ÁªÏµÈË£º¹ù½õºê ÁªÏµµç»°£º(0)13859713911 ¹«Ë¾£ºÌ¨Íą̊±±ºè´óÆóÒµÉÌó¹«Ë¾ Ò»¡¢µçÄÔÅä¼þ (ÈËÃñ±Ò) 1.cpu InteI p4 2G/1.8G/1.7G(Socket478) £¤ 500/420/390Ôª InteI p4 1.6G/1.5G/1.4G(Socket478) £¤

Hi, We are using samba-3.0.28a on linux-2-6-18 with which WinVista, as CIFS client, see the soft limit as hard limit and doesn't allow data transfer. Is there a fix already available for this? If not, could you pls gimme some pointers to fix this issue? Thanks, Senthil M Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message

[i'm not subscribe to this list, please put me on CC...] I've asked this on samba-it (italian) mailing list, but with no clue. In my installation (debian sarge, samba 3.0.14a, kernel 2.6 and xfs filesystem) i've put roaming profile on quotas, and something i think strange happens. The client say to the user that cannot update the profile, also if it was under the soft (and hard)

I would appreciate if somebody can clarify a few points. I am doing some random WRITES (100% writes, 100% random) testing and observe that ARC grows way beyond the "hard" limit during the test. The hard limit is set 512 MB via /etc/system and I see the size going up to 1 GB - how come is it happening? mdb''s ::memstat reports 1.5 GB used - does this include ARC as well or is

Hi , I was previously using xen and currently moved to KVM. I am using libvirt to manage these VMs. In den's credit scheduler , I had the ability to set a cap on the cpu usage for a VM. But I was not able to find a similar substitute in KVM. I find that we can use cgroups to provide shares for VM but that will be more like weight based and it doesn't set a hard cap for that VM. I tried

Hi Samuel, please also have a look at ?memory.limit. You can set this limit at R startup. It is in megabytes. Maybe R Studio sets it at runtime. Best Tomas On 4/7/20 3:57 PM, Samuel Granjeaud IR/Inserm wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > Many thanks for your answer. > > Here is a copy of a fresh session under RStudio, and after a copy > under Rgui. > Strangely enough the result of

Hello, I've tried searching for information regarding this problem but haven't found anything. Currently I have a Dovecot 2.0.9 with virtual users from a SQL table. Right now I'm only using global quota limits. Here is my quota setup: plugin { quota = maildir:User quota quota_rule = *:storage=3G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M quota_rule3 = Archive:storage=+1G

Dear Samuel, The most important information from your mail was the actual error message: "cannot allocate vector of size 12.6 Gb". You'll need to know what code generated this error message. And then figure out if the code does something sensible. Often that is not the case when you get a similar error message. Best regards, ir. Thierry Onkelinx Statisticus / Statistician

Hi, I'm compiling a large code base that uses tagged data, with the tag in the two lowest bits. I.e. ints are shifted two steps to the left and have 2 in the tag bits, pointers have 0 in the tag bits, etc. When I compile the code, I notice that there are places where -O3 doesn't remove unnecessary tag bit tests and manipulations, when they are performed with bitwise manipulation (which

Hi, I am not not sure whether this topic belongs to this mail list, but I feel the subscribers here should be the right audience. I noticed that the memory limit reported under Windows is 16 GB. I am wondering how to increase it. I didn't found anything in Rprofile.site nor .Rprofile. Is this limit hard coded at compilation? Best, Samuel [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi there, I use rsync to push files from remote servers. I added "run-time" patch to stop running at 8 am. If run goes to 8am, I should received a "run-time limit exceeded" error. But, half the time, I get : rsync: [sender] write error: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(829) [sender=3.1.1] == Error at 08:00:15 == I passed