similar to: rc.sysinit problem in domU

I really wants to know. When I start "xm create fc3 -c" but always maintenance mode. Is someone kind enough to point whats wrong with me? Configfiles are like this. kernel ="/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4xenU" memory =128 name = "fc3" nics = 1 disk = [''file:/root/fedora.img,hda2,w''] ip="210.166.211.245"

Basically the issue comes down to my Volume Groups not being found by this initrd, causing good ole kernel panic. initrd-2.6.12.6-xen3_12.1_rhel4.1.img [root@xen01 lvm]# uname -a Linux xen01.inside.***.com 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jan 5 17:13:01 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@xen01 lvm]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 2) Everything

I''m struggling to get Xen to boot on a FC4 Opteron box. I''ve included the tail of the boot log below [1]. I suspect that the problems relates to the software RAID 1 root and boot partitions, and how it relates to the initrd image. The RAID volumes fail to mount. I compiled the Xen snapshot from the 23rd September, and the only change I''ve made is to enable the

Hi All, I am trying to evaluate whether centos-4.8 system container work on Fedora-19 machine or not. Host machine : Fedora 19 Guest (LXC container) : CentOS4 .8 For creation of of container i followed following steps, 1. Installed libvirt packages on fedora19 2. For installation of rootfs using yum, I have created the LOCAL YUM REPO using CentOS-4.8 ISO files

Howdy folks, I''m trying to boot Xen 3.0 on a Centos 4(.2) system with root on a software raid1 volume. When booting the Xen kernel, ''raidautorun'' in the /init nash script fails to assemble either the root md or the raid5 md containing my LVM volumes. If I move root to /dev/hda1, the system boots fine. raidautorun still fails to assemble the md devices, but mdadm

Dear All, Currently i am using CentOS 4.4 Linux After i am rebooted the PC and I have getting problem like /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: line 126: 442 Segmentation fault /bin/dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL Initialization hardware... /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: line 167: 450 Segmentation fault LC_ALL=C fgrep -xq "$1" /etc/hotplug/blacklist >/dev/null /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: line 167: 455 Segmentation

Hi again I have a minimal Fedora Core 3 image running fine as domain 0 (thanks and sorry for the previous FAQ query) using both the standard install ramdisk image, and the FC3 ramdisk image downloaded from xen sourceforge. However, I can''t get it running in a non-zero domain. In brief, I have a full FC3 installed on /dev/hda1, which I typically use as my domain 0 OS. Then I have a

I hope the CentOS people don't mind me cross-posting for their input. I've just done a clean, text-mode minimal WBEL4 install on an IBM Netfinity 4500, essentially the same hardware as an xSeries 340. The install went fine but now the box will boot, run through the initrd init sequence, perform its switchroot then hang here... SELinux: Initializing. SELinux: Starting in permissive mode

I am having major problems on one of my file-servers. I have the root filesystem on an Ext3 software RAID 1 between four SCSI drives. It had been running for about two months without problems, but today I found it was having some trouble with unlinked inodes and I/O errors on certain files. I took it down to single-user mode, and ran fsck on it. That operation mixed up files like /etc/hosts with

On 04/12/2016 05:37 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "????" <tadao at creative-japan.org> ?: "centos" >> <centos at centos.org> Envoy?: Mardi 12 Avril 2016 08:17:13 Objet: >> [CentOS] mount bind problem > >> I have set on fstab /home with 'mount bind' but it seems like bind >> is not

On 04/13/2016 12:02 AM, ???? wrote: > In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, > there's "mount -a -n -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2i,glusterfs -O > no_netdev". > > > I have other same type servers. And on other servers with same /etc/fstsb, > file system is correct. > There's no difference between normal server's rc.sysinit and this problem > server's

Hello, i am running CentOS 5.4. i have a requirement where i need to have 1 application have a single processor all to its self, and the rest of the system run on the other processors. "taskman" lets me bind the process to a processor(s), but it does not make it exclusive. Is this possible to do? i have even tried mucking around with the rc.sysinit, but to no avail. thank you very

Hi All, I think I have managed to corrupt my quota files so I need to run `quotacheck` but that needs the partition to have quotas off or be unmounted which isn't ideal for a production system :-p I was trying to find a way to force the system to do a full `quotacheck -cvuga` on a reboot but on looking in rc.sysinit it seems it will only force a quotacheck on boot when fsck finds

We are trying to create RHEL6.1 container and having trouble getting a proper console to the container. I have used lxc containers in the past and lxc has a script (lxc-fedora) to setup a basic Fedora container. Is there something similar or docs with virtmgr ? We started out making a copy of the root fs and using that copy as the root for the container. I made a couple of tweaks to the

Ran into a bit of a sticky wicket today. And for reasons that should be obvious it was a bit difficult to google for a solution, so I backed out the upgrade. So I'm hoping someone here has seen and fixed this already. System: CentOS 7, fully updated. After the nss updates in the past day or so, visiting https://www.google.com with Firefox results in the following error screen: Secure

I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB access to work on the guest. This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a web search, but I have not found a solution that works on CentOS 5. I got no response on the vbox-users mailing list either. Can anyone

On Sun, January 11, 2015 11:22 am, Sven Kieske wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote: >> What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide? >> > Well (re)starting services in a reliable way? > Ensuring that services are up and running? > > About which sysinit are you talking btw?

Amazon (or perhaps Amazon's configuration of Xen) forces a machine to come up at run level 4, regardless of what's in /etc/inittab. I've looked through /etc/rc.sysinit and /etc/rc.d/rc, to determine which (if any script) looks at /proc/cmdline and forces a particular run level, but to no avail. It seems that /sbin/init does the forcing. Can anyone confirm that /sbin/init reads

I often get the message: EXT2-fs warning (device hda6): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2 I have googled for a reason and a way to solve this - but not found something I could use. Maybe somebody here konws what to do? best regards keld

thanks for the reply, Phil It would, were udev not inserting USB and/or eSATA drives at /dev/sdb1 and/or /dev/sdc1 and exposing the array to the udev rule intended to handle only removable devices (at sdc or sdd). The array then mounts unpredictably in /media/xxx-sdc1 or sdd1 - not what is wanted - depend on how many removable devices are plugged at the time of rebooting. Of course, a single