Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "bdb xml"
2009 Mar 18
0
glusterfs bdb backend problem
I cannot touch or cp files to glusterfs filesystem with bdb backend.
orion31 is glusterfs server, orion28 is glusterfs client.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[root at orion28 ~]# mount -t glusterfs /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs-bdb.vol /mnt
[root at orion28 ~]# touch /mnt/a
touch: cannot touch `/mnt/a': No such file or directory
[root
2009 Sep 15
1
can´t build ruby bindings with msvc (xapian 1.1.2)
hi
i?m trying to build the ruby bindings in xapian 1.1.2 on win xp.
i?ve
1. pulled the tags/1.1.2 revision from svn
2. built SWIG from repo via MinGW and MSYS (swig -help works, so build seems
ok to me)
3. built xapian-core following readme in ...\win32msvc, apitest doesn?t give
errors
now if i try to build:
"...\ruby>nmake SWIGBUILD=1
Microsoft (R) Program
2009 Mar 05
1
BDB speed benefits
Hi.
Any idea what speed benefits the BDB translator provides over standard file
storage?
Also, how it's reliable, and what's the maximum file size it stores in the
DB?
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090305/2b391a92/attachment.html>
2006 Sep 19
2
[OT] SVN: Anybody use BDB?
I''m moving my Subversion repository to a new server. The old server uses
Berkeley DB/Sleepycat and if memory serves, it was a lot of effort to
set that up -- so I think I''ll try FSFS. Does anybody use BDB and prefer
that over FSFS? Or had any problems with FSFS? (I never had any problems
with BDB, performance or otherwise, btw.)
Thanks,
Joe
--
Posted via
2008 Dec 20
1
glusterfs1.4rc6 bdb problem
I download 1.4rc6 version, and
#rpmbuild -ta glusterfs-1.4.0rc6.tar.gz --without ibverbs
# cd /usr/src/redhat/RPM/i386/
# rpm -ivh glusterfs-1.4.0rc6-1.i386.rpm
my configuration:
# cat /etc/gluster/glusterfs-server.vol
volume bdb
type storage/bdb
option directory /data2/glusterfs
option checkpoint-timeout 10
option lru-limit 200
end-volume
volume bdbserver
type protocol/server
option
2006 Nov 26
0
Bug#400432: logcheck-database: slapcat Initializing BDB
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.51
Severity: wishlist
I'm backup my ldap with slapcat (from package slapd) and get a entry in
syslog. Can you add to /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/slpad:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapcat: bdb_db_init: Initializing BDB database$
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers experimental
APT policy: (1, 'experimental')
2008 Oct 25
2
can not compile 1.1.5 with BDB
Hi!
I'm trying to use dovecot-1.1.5 with Berkley DB 4.6.21 on OpenBSD.
While compiling I get this:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-sql \
-DPKG_RUNDIR=\""/var/run/dovecot"\" -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99\
-g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations \
-Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast \
2011 Jan 01
1
[LLVMdev] "nmake check" doesn't work for MSVC
Hi,
I built llvm+Clang for MSVC 10 with
cmake ../../Source/LLVM -G"NMake Makefiles"
nmake
And I tried to do a
nmake check
(which works for MinGW and "mingw32-make check")
and get the following error:
>Scanning dependencies of target check
>[100%] Running LLVM regression tests
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
2013 Aug 26
1
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM 3.3 on Win64
... Or maybe not? I just tried it again in the exact same configuration
that did work before, and this time it fails at an earlier stage with a
different error:
[ 66%] Building CXX object
lib/Target/Mips/CMakeFiles/LLVMMipsCodeGen.dir/Mips16FrameLowering.cpp.obj
Mips16FrameLowering.cpp
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~2.0\VC\bin\cl.exe' : return
code '0xffffffff'
2004 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] Final Visual Studio Patches
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:25:39 +0100
"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've come over an open source script which should be able to convert unix
> (gnu?) like makefiles to nmake. However, It possible needs some changes to
> work with the llvm makefile framework.
I'm very doubtful this utility is of any use. nmake is useless compared
to gnu
2013 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM 3.3 on Win64
Hi Russel,
I never tried to build LLVM with nmake. With msbuild it works without
problems. You can find a short desription here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_and_hacking_LDC_on_Windows_using_MSVC,
section Build LLVM.
Regards
Kai
On 24.08.2013 21:15, Russell Wallace wrote:
> I'm trying to build LLVM 3.3 using cmake/nmake, Microsoft C++ 2012, on a
> 64-bit Windows 7 system. I
2013 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM 3.3 on Win64
After some running some more tests, a weird addendum to this case: the
build also fails at the same place with the same error message if MinGW
isn't in the path. I'm not talking about MinGW instead of Microsoft C++,
it's just that the build works if and only if MinGW is in the path _as well
as_ the 32-bit version of Microsoft C++.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Russell Wallace
2004 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] Final Visual Studio Patches
Then, there is only one solution left as suggested by Reid. Count me in...
Henrik
----Original Message Follows----
From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org>
Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Final Visual Studio Patches
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:16:53 -0800
On Tue, 02
2004 Nov 02
3
[LLVMdev] Final Visual Studio Patches
Jeff Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:25:39 +0100
> "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I've come over an open source script which should be able to convert unix
>>(gnu?) like makefiles to nmake. However, It possible needs some changes to
>>work with the llvm makefile framework.
>
>
> I'm very
2004 Jul 07
1
OH323-COMPILE
HI ALL
HI MICHAEL;
My name is mohammad and I am iranian.I have been trying to install oh323 channel but I come up with dead end. In fact it makes me crazy.
plz help me michael. I saw mailing list and I trid serevel CVS headers such as , 2004-06-07( seven of june) 0r 2004-07-02( second of july)
besides I use:
1-openh323 v1.12.2
2-pwlib v1.5.2
3- asterisk CVS (2004-06-07,
2003 Jan 15
1
Newbie question - does it work with Sun Cobalt RaQ550?
Hi,
I'd like to know if RSYNC work on a Sun Cobalt RaQ550. Does someone trid it? If yes, please let me know if I can take contact with you.
Stephane
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2013 Aug 24
4
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM 3.3 on Win64
I'm trying to build LLVM 3.3 using cmake/nmake, Microsoft C++ 2012, on a
64-bit Windows 7 system. I tried it with the 32-bit compiler as a test case
first and that appeared to work, then with the 64-bit compiler in the hope
that would give me a 64-bit build of LLVM, but instead got this error
message:
[ 86%] Generating X86CompilationCallback_Win64.obj
Microsoft (R) Macro Assembler (x64)
2006 Apr 21
0
errors in abld build wins udeb
I am trying to compile speex.1.1.12 for Symbian OS but I get lots of
errors:
C:\Programmi\Symbian\7.0s\Series60_v21\Series60Ex\speex-1.1.12\symbian>abld
buil
d wins udeb
make -r -f
"\Programmi\Symbian\7.0s\Series60_v21\EPOC32\BUILD\PROGRAMMI\SYMBI
AN\7.0S\SERIES60_V21\SERIES60EX\SPEEX- 1.1.12\SYMBIAN\EXPORT.make" EXPORT
VERBOSE
=-s
Nothing to do
make -r -f
2006 Apr 21
0
error in abld build wins udeb
Le vendredi 21 avril 2006 ? 12:12 +0200, Paola Ruo Rui a ?crit :
> I am trying to compile speex.1.1.12 for Symbian OS but I get lots of
> errors:
I think you might (no guaranty) have a better chance of getting help if
your error messages are in a language people on this list understand.
Jean-Marc
>
> C:\Programmi\Symbian\7.0s\Series60_v21\Series60Ex\speex-1.1.12
>
2017 Sep 01
1
how to build Xapian project on windows?
> Those nmake files have been without a maintainer since about 2011, so
> it's not a big surprise that they don't work without a few tweaks at
> this point.
> Nobody seems interested in keeping the nmake files up to date, so it's
> probably time we just removed them.
I think formerly it was listed on the Xapian website which was the last version of xapian-core known to