similar to: domU Device eth0 does not seem to be present

I''ve just installed Xen on a new CentOS 5.1 system, and I can''t seem to make xenbr0 connect to the network. This system has a single physical network card. Apart from creating a few DomU guests, I have not changed any of the configuration. After running network-bridge, xenbr0 and friends are created, but the address and routing info is not moved. James # ip addr

Hello All, I'm trying to figure out why xen-utils-common 3.2 doesn't suport bridging on multiple interfaces. I've been digging around /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridges. And modified it so that during boot, when executed the script writes into /tmp/netbr file, but I commented out code that actually creates bridges. I discovered that this script is called three times during boot, I

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

Hi! I''m not new to Xen but I''m new to this list. I''m having a truely bizarre problem with Xen bridged networking at the moment. This is a new install, on RHEL4. The symptom is that any domU set up simply fails to talk to anything else. It''s there, and running, and it has an ethernet device, but there''s never any response. After digging through the

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

Hello, I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel 2.6.8-24.11-default My ip addr show output is as follows: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0:

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

Hi, We have a Dell server with 4 Ethernet interface. I would to aggregate them in a bond. Everything work but the default gateway doesn?t work on the ? bond0 ? interface and I have no links. My configuration: - CentOS 7: :/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# uname -a Linux nas-mtd2 3.10.0-957.5.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 1 14:54:57 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux - NetworkManager disabled:

On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs > 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. > > To save

Hello, I am trying something crazy here. I have gone through the old archives, lartc.org and lot''s of documentation, but still something is wrong. Here is the situation; The server is Fedora core 2 running kernel 2.6.5 I have 2 uplinks to two different ISP''s. (It will be 3-4 in the future). These ISP''s should serve the bandwith to local clients with multiple subnets.

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was

I should have what i want to achive. The server is intended as a host for VMs. Our network has multiple VLANs, and the VMs will be connected to different VLANS. The interface eno1 is for host traffic and eno2 is connected to the trunk port of the switch, making the different VLANS availabel to the VMs via the br0. I want to use a VLAN-aware br0, so that I specify in my VM config (on the host

> Dear CentOS-Community, > > we are facing the following issue: > > A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which > causes several issues in our setup. Hi, Can you show as the config of eno4? And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a difference somewhere. Regards, Simon > > > This server is equipped with four nics

(if this post gets line-feed-mangled please read http://www.dl.reneschmidt.de/shorewallxenpost.txt - that''s an unmangled version, thank you) Hello, first I would like to thank the Mr. Eastep and contributors for this great piece of software and superb documentation. I have a SOHO server (Debian testing) that I''m using for several purposes so I''ve set up a Xen

If you are running Lollipop / Android 5.x on your Nexus 5, then you are probably seeing the same issue I was with it. lollipop seems to change networking quite a bit in that it's using iptables / and `ip rule list` extensively for per-user settings. I think http://www.linux.org/threads/debugging-nat-prerouting-issues-iptables.7136/ is relevant if you see running in to the same issue, it's

Hi everyone. I am so baffled by the following problem: Office 1 is using ADSL and it is building a VPN tunnel with IPSEC to Office 2. Both ends are using shorewall/freeswan firewalls. Diagram: Office1 fw --- VPN TUNNEL --- Office2 fw --- cisco router ----- VLANS | DMZ Office 1 has the following interfaces: 2: eth0:

My domains dont see any traffic until you try to connect out from within the domain. Tried this several times and it was consistent. I have no firewall either. running each domain on different cpu probably doesn''t help, although Im no network expert. Here is some info. ================ [root@a root]# xm info system : Linux host : a.b.com release

SELinux is considered as the biggest problem. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 22:37 Andrea Squeri <andrea.squeri at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. The problem is lollipop. I tried to install tinc on my brother's > device which mount a cyano 10.1( android 4.2.2) and it works. > I don't understand which is the problem with lollipop. Is there a > firewall that block the packets? >

I'm trying to get an Archlinux guest running on a Archlinux host. Everything works except ethernet. When I boot the host, --- # dmesg |tail [ 8.265493] Bridge firewalling registered [ 8.514547] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): virbr0: link is not ready [ 8.645303] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team --- Then I do --- # virsh -c lxc:/// start gitolite Domain gitolite started #

Hi, I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is PPPoE. My setup is as follows: internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0 <-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal networks Things are working fine, but the link is