similar to: DRBD and XEN

Hi all, I thought to have tested this a while ago but I guess not. I have a Centos 5.3 system (call its SYSA) software raid 0, 2 disks. I have an identical system (SYSB) else were, so I pull one of my mirrors drives from SYSA and put it in SYSB as the only drive in SYSB. Upon but I get grub error. I boot in recuse mode (CD, linux rescue) and it attempts to mount the disk, but claims no

Hi, I made a small error in the impulse reponse function; when doing the inverse fft in fixed point, it will overflow unless it's properly scaled. This patch uses the same scaling as that used when updating the filters, and the outputs now have the same shape and the same scale in fixed and floating point. Best regards, Thorvald -------------- next part -------------- diff -ubBwr

I burned a DVD for CentOS 4.1. I booted from it and everything went fine for the graphical screen installation. I choose separate partitions for my /boot (hde6), / (hde9), and swap (hde12) areas. My /boot partition was ext2 and my / partition was ext3. I installed grub in my /boot partition successfully. I have a Boot Loader, System Commander 8.13 which controls the MBR. The installation then

Hi All, I'm new to XEN and using XEN 4.1 on UBUNTU to run Win7 guest. I've 2 Servers(both UBUNTU 12), where Server1 is configured with full Win7 guest installation on a partition(It works fine). Now as i use DRBD to replicate this partition into Server2 system and try to boot the Win7 DOMU from harddisk, I get below mentioned error - Windows failed to start. A recent hardware or

Hello, I have a couple of Dell 2950 III, both of them with CentOS 5.3, Xen, drbd 8.2 and cluster suite. Hardware: 32DB RAM, RAID 5 with 6 SAS disks (one hot spare) on a PERC/6 controller. I configured DRBD to use the main network interfaces (bnx2 driver), with bonding and crossover cables to have a direct link. The normal network traffic uses two different network cards. There are two DRBD

Hi, Here's the second attempt of a patch to get the impulse response from the echo canceller :) -------------- next part -------------- diff -ubBwr clean/include/speex/speex_echo.h get_impulse/include/speex/speex_echo.h --- clean/include/speex/speex_echo.h 2007-10-09 13:08:15.000000000 +0200 +++ get_impulse/include/speex/speex_echo.h 2008-02-12 23:58:11.000000000 +0100 @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@

Hi, I have just installed centos 4.2 on machine remotely and everything went well, a second drive was installed, I partitioned it, rebooted and then tried to mount it but keep getting the error mount: /dev/hde6 already mounted or /mnt/1 busy this happens with every partition on any secondary disk, we put a third disk in and get the same error. I have googled but not found anything relevant,

Mike, I played briefly with the echo canceller on the C5509A back in May 2006. I got the same compiler warnings, and sent a message to the list which included this: "I got several compiler warnings for "shift out of range" in mdf.c, which I fixed by adding EXTEND32 to all of the SHL32s with 16 bit operands (st->frame_size in 6 places, st->wtmp2 in 1 place)." I sent

trying to follow the ha-drbd HOWTO on the centos wiki... I prep two identical systems with centos 5, leaving some disk space unassigned (they only have one scsi drive), create /dev/sda4 partitions on each to use for the repdata... I install the modules, create a /etc/drbd.conf like... [root at svfis-blade03 ~]# more /etc/drbd.conf # # please have a a look at the example configuration file in

I looked back at my old C55 EC build, and I had the same warning in mdf.c which Mike found. The assembly code did have a valid shift, and this build did cancel echo. When I built with the SVN head, I saw the errors in kiss_fft.c also. The assembly there also has valid shifts. So, I suspect that these warnings do not indicate a real problem. It might be interesting to break down the

Jim Crichton a ?crit : > I played briefly with the echo canceller on the C5509A back in May > 2006. I got the same compiler warnings, and sent a message to the > list which included this: > > "I got several compiler warnings for "shift out of range" in mdf.c, > which I fixed by adding EXTEND32 to all of the SHL32s with 16 bit > operands (st->frame_size in 6

Jean-Marc, I dug into this further, and found that the warning occurred when PSHR32 had a shift greater than 15. in fixed_generic.h, PSHR32 is defined as: #define PSHR32(a,shift) (SHR32((a)+((1<<((shift))>>1)),shift)) For 16-bit compilers the "1" needs a cast: #define PSHR32(a,shift) (SHR32((a)+((EXTEND32(1)<<((shift))>>1)),shift)) This change fixed the

Hi, I'm using 1.2beta3 on a 5416 DSP I have been getting warning messages that say: "kiss_fft.c", line 142: warning: shift count is too large I've noticed this on the echo canceller and the preprocessor. all pretty much related to these two lines of code: kiss_fft C_MUL4(scratch[0],Fout[m] , *tw1 ); mdf.c st->wtmp2[i] =

Hullo everybody how can I create File-based thin-provisioned VHD on a Filesystem for VM images for a local non-shared Filesystem (EXT type SR), for with the configurations i have dont allow me make a 4th partition Below are my configurations. [root@virtualintranet /]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 1998.2 GB, 1998233534464 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 242938 cylinders Units = cylinders of

yes, our DSP is 16 bit based, and if those bits of code aren't using 32 bit variables then yes that is what the warnings would be. Does this mean that the preprocessor and echo canceller won't work as well because of this? -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 01/18/08 8:42 PM >>> I think these warnings are due to your DSP being 16-bit and

Hi Jim, Thanks a lot for investigating. It definitely makes sense now. I'll fix the problem now. Is there any other place where you see that same (or similar) problem? Jean-Marc Jim Crichton a ?crit : > Jean-Marc, > > I dug into this further, and found that the warning occurred when PSHR32 > had a shift greater than 15. > > in fixed_generic.h, PSHR32 is defined as: >

Thanks Jim for looking into that, I was really starting to wonder what was going on. Let me know if you find a way to tell the compiler to stop complaining. Jean-Marc Jim Crichton a ?crit : > I looked back at my old C55 EC build, and I had the same warning in > mdf.c which Mike found. The assembly code did have a valid shift, and > this build did cancel echo. > > When I built

Hi, Sorry for the need of the long winded email. Looking for some answers to the following. I am setting up a xen PV domU on top of a LVM partitioned DRBD device. Everything was going just fine until I tried to test the filesystems in the domU. Here is my setup; Dom0 OS: CentOS release 5 (Final) Kernel: 2.6.18-8.1.4.el5.centos.plusxen Xen: xen-3.0.3-25.0.3.el5 DRBD:

Jean-Marc, I recently started looking at running the echo canceller on a TI C55 DSP along with the 8kbps narrowband Speex encoder/decoder. This is one of those "braindead compilers" that you refer to from time to time, and cannot handle the float struct assignments in the return statements in pseudofloat.h. Most of these were eliminated in build 11311 (patch by Brian Retford), but

Today our server had seriuos problems, we had to reinitiate it and run fsck manually. Dou you think it's an ext3, kernel (vanilla 2.4.19) or hardware bug? The errors were (from syslog): -------------------------------- Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: 72:02: rw=0, want=230266240, limit=4882432 Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt