similar to: RE: (3ware) xen 3.0 amd64 crash... seems to be tied intodisk i/o, > 4 gig ram

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "RE: (3ware) xen 3.0 amd64 crash... seems to be tied intodisk i/o, > 4 gig ram"

2005 Dec 31
1
3ware error
I am getting this error:- 3w-9xxx: scsi0: ERROR: (0x03:0x0104): SGL entry has illegal length:address=0x3744A000, length=0xFF, cmd=X. In dmesg it finds the controller OK:- 3ware 9000 Storage Controller device driver for Linux v2.26.02.001. ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:06.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 scsi0 : 3ware 9000 Storage Controller 3w-9xxx: scsi0: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage
2009 Jul 02
0
3w_9xxx + Xen-patched 2.6.30 dom0 == bad LUN detection
I''ve been attempting to update my dom0 kernel by using the 2.6.27 git tree from the xenclient repo and also to 2.6.30 using opensuse patches rebased by Andrew Lyon. In both cases there''s a problem with the 3ware 3w_9xxx driver incorrectly detecting the LUNs on the device or some other issue, which ultimately prevents partition table detection. In my testing I applied the
2012 May 30
0
Bug#675266: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64: Hard reset when starting a DomU on HP DL585 G7 // Opteron 6238
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-4 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello Debian Team, I have some strange behavior with a DL585 G7 with only two cpu sockets used (Opteron 6238 Interlagos). I use Debian 6.0 with a XEN Kernel. Every time when I start a DomU, the server makes a hard reset without any kernel panic or output. When I start the
2011 Aug 17
2
Strange Kernel Warning.
Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE
2007 Mar 29
2
DDR2 compile times (was Re: segfaults with 8 gig of ram)
Hello All. Below are some compile times for 2.6.20 on an fx-62 running Centos64 with various 2 gig sticks of dual channel ram (See previous posts with subject of 'segfaults with 8gig of ram' for more details.) It seems dual channel will compile a kernel faster, but only gained around 30 seconds over 20 minutes. Below are the shortest/longest compile times of several compiles done over the
2009 Sep 14
1
qla2xxx 0000:05:0d.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Scheduling ISP abort.
hi All, Re below - thanks for the replies to the fsck question. I have run fsck -r /data and this eventually completed with several changes made. Now I am getting the following error from the qla2xxx driver on boot . . . qla2xxx 0000:05:0d.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Scheduling ISP abort. qla2xxx 0000:05:0d.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Scheduling ISP abort. . etc . It looks
2007 Mar 22
5
segfaults with 8 gig of ram
Hello All. I have five Centos 4.4 x86_64 (amd fx-62) boxes with 4 gig of Corsair dual channel ram running kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL (smp). The sixth box is the same except for video card and ram. It is using 8gig of GSkill dual channel ram and has a very cheap ATI video card in it. This box will segfault on boot unless I use noapic acpi=off and nolapic. Even with these boot params, the box is not
2007 Sep 07
2
Installation troubles
I have a new machine I'm trying to install Centos 5.0 on and I'm not getting very far. The system is 2 dual core xeons (5160, 3.0 GHZ) w/ 8GB ram. It has two 320 GB disks on the motherboard controller (Supermicro X7DAE+), and 8 750 GB disks on a 3ware 9650SE-8ml, pcie (x4) controller card. The 8 disks are set up as two raid 5 volumes (4 disks each). There is a scsi card in the machine
2009 Sep 27
0
SUMMARY : multipath using defaults rather than multipath.conf contents for some devices (?) - why ?
The reason for the behaviour observed below turned out to be that the device entry in /etc/multipath.conf was inadvertently appended *after* the devices section , rather than inside it - so that we had #devices { # device { # blah blah # } (file has a bunch of defaults commented out) # etc #} # # device { our settings } *rather than*
2005 Sep 27
6
Memory and other settings for xen server, help needed....
Hi all, i have a question. I''m going to setup a Xen server for a client. It''s going to serve about 25 clients. It''s a Athlon 64 3200+, which currently runs Debian i386-stable and xen 2.0.7 until Xen 3.0 is stable enough, and then i''m gonna replace it with Debian amd64-stable and Xen 3.0. The Xen dom''s consists of: Samba , file printer sharing most
2006 Apr 05
2
3ware 9550SX and CentOS
I'm getting a couple of systems that are arriving with the new 3ware 9550sx controller. Does anyone know when this will be natively supported by CentOS? Has anyone built an RPM of the driver/module for this new controller?
2009 Sep 13
1
Repair Filesystem prompt , after inode has illegal blocks
hi All, A fault on our SAN dropped us down to a read-only filesystem and after reboot, we have an "Unexpected Inconsistency" and I am being instructed by the boot to run fsck manually without -a or -p (this was after I think processing around 15% of the filesystem) The specific message is "inode 27344909 has illegal blocks" I recall running fsck some years ago on smaller
2012 Jul 31
1
FreeBSD 9.1-BETA1 amd64 fails to mount ZFS rootfs with error 2 when system has more than 3584MB of RAM
Dear Everyone, I am running FreeBSD 9.1-BETA1 amd64 on ZFS in KVM on Gentoo Linux on ZFS. The root pool uses ashift=13 and is on a single disk. The kernel fails to mount the root filesystem if the system has more than 3584MB of RAM. I did a manual binary search to try to find the exact upper limit, but stopped when I tried 3648MB. FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE works perfectly. Yours truly, Richard Yao
2006 Sep 13
0
Processed: Re: Bug#387238: xen-hypervisor: Xen hypervisor reboots when scrubbing ram message is reached: confirmed on AMD64 and i386
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 387238 xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386 Bug#387238: xen-hypervisor: Xen hypervisor reboots when scrubbing ram message is reached: confirmed on AMD64 and i386 Warning: Unknown package 'xen-hypervisor' Bug reassigned from package `xen-hypervisor' to `xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please
2006 Nov 03
0
Bug#387238: marked as done (xen-hypervisor: Xen hypervisor reboots when scrubbing ram message is reached: confirmed on AMD64 and i386)
Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:34:57 +0200 with message-id <20060913083457.GA11942@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB:
2009 Jan 15
2
i386 hypervisor seeing only ~16G RAM, amd64 required?
Hi, I have several machines using xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 from etch-backports and they recently got upgraded to 20 or 24G RAM. I have seen talk of a limit of a 16G RAM with 32bit PAE Xen and indeed this is what I am seeing. I am guessing there is still no way to get the 32bit hypervisor to see more than 16G RAM, and I must go to 64bit. Can I boot a 64bit hypervisor and still keep the same
2014 Jan 09
1
Bug#734761: xen-system-amd64: "XEN kernel detects 3GB RAM instead of 4GB"
Package: xen-system-amd64 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Severity: normal The xen kernel detects 3GB of memory instead of the full 4GB. When using the "normal" kernel 4GB is detected. On boot the 4GB is detected: root at ams-tc1-xen27:~# dmesg |grep Mem [ 0.000000] Memory: 3226132k/4980736k available (3426k kernel code, 788180k absent, 966424k reserved, 3312k data, 576k init) But only
2015 Jun 08
2
Problem with GT218 (GeForce GT210)
Hello, I'm facing issues with a Point of View GT210/218 and nouveau drivers. I'm using ubuntu server with LXDE on top of it... *lshw -c video* output: *-display description: VGA compatible controller product: GT218 [GeForce 210] vendor: NVIDIA Corporation physical id: 0 bus info: pci at 0000:01:00.0 version: a2 width: 64 bits clock:
2012 Apr 12
1
Interpretation of a hardware error
Hey, folks, I've just started seeing Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: MC4_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|-|Poison|CECC]: 0xdd0accf2001d011b Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: Northbridge Error (node 1, core 1): ECC error in L3 cache tag. Apr 12 13:09:59 <server> kernel: [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD Apr 12 13:09:59
2007 Oct 07
1
How to use PCI pass-through?
Hi, I have noticed that the Intel VT-d patch has merged into unstable source tree. My question is how to use the PCI pass-through feature? The Intel Q35 express northbridge chipset (with VT-d) motherboard is out. I am eager to try it out. Thanks! HY _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users