similar to: RE: veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is from thebridge-utils?

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge, > > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up. > > kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think > thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing? I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network script rather than using the

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Severity: important My server is a dell 2950 server. Before the dom0 rebooting bug ocurred, xen was well even for hvm domU. By now i have tried xen-hypervisor-3.0-amd64 (3.0.2+hg9697-2) and xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 (3.0-unstable+hg11292-2), but both of them are unusable for me. for

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it

Hi, I''m using RHEL linux 5.1, I can''t add the another NIC to my virtual machine. # /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the loopback driver supports. If the loopback driver is a module, you may raise this limit by passing it as a parameter (nloopbacks=<N>); if the

I'm new to the list. hopefully my question is correctly placed here... I'd installed my samba server 3.5.6 on debian squeeze in a openvz container that uses venet. I'd love to keep it that way but I'm not sure if that is ok. Do you use samba server with venet or do I have to change to veth? I already read http://wiki.openvz.org/Differences_between_venet_and_veth and I don't

During my attempts to get the latest bridge networking model working on my system, I often invoked ''network-bridge stop'' with total failure. Attached is an updated version that works. -Andrew signed-off-by: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hello, I''m used to using Xen in a bridge mode where my dom0 and all domUs are on the same layer 2 network. However now I have to set up a server whose eth0 is on one network and the domUs will be on another /29. So, for example, if the eth0 of dom0 is 192.168.1.214/24, then I have 10.1.1.0/29 (10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.7) routed to it for use in domUs, how would I go about setting that up?

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm even if STP is enabled. # unshare -n # ip link add br0 type bridge # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 # ip link set veth0 master br0 up # ip link set veth1 master br0 up # ip link set br0 type bridge stp_state 1 # ip link set br0 up # sleep 30 # ip -s link show br0 2: br0:

On 12/07/2023 17:48, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:54:15PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: >> When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm >> even if STP is enabled. >> >> # unshare -n >> # ip link add br0 type bridge >> # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 >> # ip link set veth0 master

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

xenconsole fix. reference of tty->count in xencons_close() is racy. It must be protected by tty_sem semaphore like con_close() in drivers/char/vt.c -- yamahata _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel