similar to: Two interfaces in a guest domain

> That''s great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1. You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and should be increased), but can be set on the command line. Ian > Em Wednesday 14 September 2005 16:30, John

Hi John, And an excellent stab that was. I have two network interfaces. eth0 is a 3Com with a Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5701 Gigabit Ethernet chip, and eth1 is a 3Com 3cSOHO100-TX Hurricane chip. On the gigabit card, I couldn''t test anything, because I could not find out how to disable/enable/check checksum offloading. Using ethtool gives: Operation not supported For the

Hello, I can''t seem to get the network going. I found this message in the log of Domain0: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dec 1 15:39:18 zms wait_for_sysfs[4180]: either wait_for_sysfs (udev 039) needs an update to handle the device ''/class/net/br0'' properly (no device symlink) or the sysfs-support of your device''s

> Hi. what creates veth0 and vifu.0, when? what''s the > underlying architecture behind them? Just trying to > understand the internals. netback/loopback.c creates them. It''s effectively a point to point link, allowing domain 0 to connect on to the bridge in the same manner that other domains do. (before, packets to domain 0 were short-cutted and came off the

Hello, Since my last update of xen, I am having problems with bridges and xen. When I want to start a bridge on the dom0 (to run a domU in a different vlan than the default) I run /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start netdev=eth0.302 bridge=xen-br302 antispoof=no where eth0.302 is an interface associated with my vlan 302 (it tags with this vlan identifier). The problem I have is that it

Hey, I''m having a bit of difficulty sshing from Dom0 to DomU and vice versa, my setup is as follows; Xen-3.0-unstable, XenLinux kernel 2.6.12 Dom0 on Redhat EL 4 Dom1 on SuSE linux 9.1 (with the standard xenU kernel included with xen-unstable) The server it runs on doesnt have a nic installed (well it does, just without drivers) the suse config file sets the eth0 interface up as

When I start xen dom0 I get that same dhcp address for eth0 and for xen-br0, dom0 can talk to the world. If I start each of my 3 domU''s mannually, each guest gets a xen-br0 vif with a dhcp address and all 3 can talk to the outside world and each other (my "flat network"). What I want is a tiered network with the first domU acting as a firewall with 3 nics vif = [

OK, I am forwarding this to the r-help. In the original message I simply hit reply and I thought I send to ALL r-help list. (apparent not) also I recieved another piece of mail.....about the RNG in Splus 4.0 or later indicating it was modified and getting worse. I only have Splus 3.4 for HP. So I cannot try it. This makes the idea of using the pre-generated RN on CDROM more appealing.. Mai

HI there guys. Sorry for disturbing you with a very basic question, log time ago, searching in the archives I found that profiles can be enabled or disabled for everyone, and that cannot be enabled for a gorup of users or a specific user. I read the how-tos, they explain very well how to manage them, but could not find that doubt, nor even I could not find that thread in the arvhives. Can some

Hello, I just setup a Xen server and wanted to use bond0 for my network connection. I ended up downloading and addeding the attatched file and making the following change in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp. I added this line: (network-script 'network-bond netdev=bond0') Would this line be a good one to add to the commented lines and include the network-bond file in the scripts? Just thought

I suggest perceptual diff. You could write a wrapper around it. http://pdiff.sourceforge.net On Mon, 7 May 2018 16:49 Ramiro Barrantes, <ramiro at precisionbioassay.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on tests to compare figures. I have been using ImageMagick, > which creates a figure signature, and I can compare a "test" figure > signature against a saved

Hello with XEN 3.4.x antispoof=yes works on a bridge setup. I am using this line in xend-config.sxp (network-script ''network-bridge antispoof=yes'') It creates this under IPTABLES FORWARD chain: ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match --physdev-in peth0 Under XEN 4.0.1 it is not working, it does not create a IPTABLES rule. Customers can

Hi folks, I am trying to get antispoofing running on xen3 (based on Debian Sarge). This is what I have done to enable it: 1. I have compiled a dom0 kernel with CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV=m 2. I made sure this module is loaded: lsmod gives xt_physdev (among others). 3a. I have changed the line "(network-script network-bridge)" to "(network-script network-bridge

Hi folks, I started testing the antispoof feature of xen stable (2.0.7). I am stuck with it. I have setup a standard bridged environment. I understood it like this: in domU config I set up the virtual NIC like vif = [ ''mac=ae:00:00:78:78:78, ip=192.168.0.100'' ] Then I configure /etc/network/interface of this domU to show the same IP address for eth0. After restarting

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814 Summary: rpfilter blocks broadcast packets Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

> > When you run xend it runs network-bridge which creates the bridge, > > renames eth0->peth0 and veth0->eth0 and brings the new eth0 back up. > > kewl, thx Ian. i see network-route doesnt do this. i think > thats a good thing. do you forsee that changing? I expect that in most routed configurations people use their own network script rather than using the

>>>>> Ramiro Barrantes <ramiro at precisionbioassay.com> >>>>> on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:02:52 +0000 writes: > Hello, I was relying on withTimeout (from R.utils) to help > me stop nlme when it ?hangs?. However, recently this > stopped working. I am pasting a reproducible example > below: withTimeout should stop nlme after 10

Hello, I am working on tests to compare figures. I have been using ImageMagick, which creates a figure signature, and I can compare a "test" figure signature against a saved "reference" figure signature. It seems to work pretty well. However, it is slow as it requires reading from the file system. Are there any options to compare figures on memory? For example, if I