similar to: Plan9 on xen

I am not sure whether this would work or if there are other limitations that would block this very simplistic porting strategy to work. Since it looks so easy on paper, I expect it to be more complicated otherwise it would probably already have been done. According to the LLVM FAQ the important dependencies for LLVM are a unix-type shell and sed [1], but those dependencies are provided by APE

In usual fashion, I have a few questions: 1) I can''t get the virtual terminal of plan9 to recognize either my Backspace or Delete key. This is particularly annoying; can anyone help? 2) I''ve got two linux root fs images that I created through dd: one for rubix and another for ubuntu. Rubix works brilliantly, but Ubuntu gets a kernel panic during boot. The two both mount have

What do I have to type to enter the directory eps? Can you help me please? Here is the display where I am just now. Saber Rider@SABER ~ $ rsync rsync://archive.plan9.de/anime/eps ***** ***** Welcome to cerebro.plan9.de! ***** ***** anime the virtual linked server directory ***** anime1 /fs/anime1 ***** anime2 /fs/anime2 ***** anime3

Dear, InetBoot(GRUB+BuildRoot+HTTP-FUSE) boots Xenoppix(Xen2.0.6) with Plan9/DomU and NetBSD/DomU. You can feel old Xen environment. :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- InetBoot (GRUB + BuildRoot + HTTP-FUSE) is released. HP: http://openlab.jp/oscircular/inetboot/ Guide-PDF: http://openlab.ring.gr.jp/oscircular/inetboot/InetBoot-httpfuse080418-E.pdf

A book of Xenoppix is published. Xenoppix is a Knoppix-DVD includes Xen and Plan9 and NetBSD. GuestOS looks to boot standalone and is used as a server. HP http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Leaflet http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/Xenoppix-leaflet-en.pdf The book includes DVD-ROM. Unfortunately is written in Japanese. The book title is "Chou Kanntan

Dear, New Xenoppix (knoppix_v4.0.2CD_20050923_xen-20051212+IPAFont.iso 1.15GB) is released. Host OS: knoppix (Linux kernel 2.6.11 + xen 2.0.6) # Please wait for xen 3.0. Guest OSes: NetBSD (kernel 2.0.1) Plan9 --- New Feature --- (1)This version has new boot option for network, NAT or DHCP. *(New) NAT version enables to boot GuestOS without network connection.

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1161 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1161.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 26eae688b6566ba557c493605242f219c0a30a300d9ef5954638bd68be109000 golang-1.4.2-4.el7_1.x86_64.rpm

Initial Announcement: Package rdyncall released on CRAN. (Version 0.7.3) The package was presented at the Use!R 2009 with the title 'An improved Foreign Function Interface for R' and is now available on CRAN and considered stable for a large range of R platforms. The package provides a cross-platform framework for dynamic binding of C libraries using a flexible Foreign Function

Initial Announcement: Package rdyncall released on CRAN. (Version 0.7.3) The package was presented at the Use!R 2009 with the title 'An improved Foreign Function Interface for R' and is now available on CRAN and considered stable for a large range of R platforms. The package provides a cross-platform framework for dynamic binding of C libraries using a flexible Foreign Function

On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > No, its up to them which backend they want to use. > Sounds like they think that GCC is super quick compared to LLVM. Looks > like another fud fart out of google to me. Actually, after chatting with Ian about it, it's more of a case of the FAQ being poorly worded than them being anti-LLVM. If you read it closely, it says

On Thursday 12 November 2009 18:59:51 Owen Anderson wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > > No, its up to them which backend they want to use. > > Sounds like they think that GCC is super quick compared to LLVM. Looks > > like another fud fart out of google to me. > > Actually, after chatting with Ian about it, it's more of a case of

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-07

Hi, I?ve setup a Samba 2.0.5a on a SuSe 6.2 based Linux 2.2.10. I?m trying to integrate the server into our NT domain SF-DOM as described in samba/textdocs/DOMAIN_MEMBER.txt . The described procedures work, but access as domain user is impossible. In the logfile I get: [1999/09/14 11:18:31, 2] smbd/server.c:main(716) Changed root to / [1999/09/14 11:18:31, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96)

Hi,Chris? I wonder which version of Xen did the para-Linux works with. I applied the patches, compiled them and tried them on both xen-3.0.2 and the latest xen-unstable. Both result in panics when booting Xen and complain as follows: (XEN) Domain 0 kernel supports features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) Domain 0 kernel requires features = { 00000005 }. (XEN) (XEN)

Report by Eric Lindblad 10-09-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com cf: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/9862 interix Yesterday I compiled cppunit-1.12.1 on the Interix g++ (3.3) compiler. xapian Subsequent to disabling the remote backend which caused gmake to skip over the /net/tcpclient.cc:77 error, resulting in xapian libs' compile, today I disabled the

Dear Olly Betts, I think the tests for the perl module Search-Xapian-1.2.21.0 might be fewer in number than the perl tests included with xapian-bindings-1.2.21. If some of the tests have similar but modified content I do not know. I am not so skilled as to interpret the compared test results. If you want to suggest a paired earlier version of Xapian to a specific xapian.bindings version, I might

On 17.05.2011, at 08:47, David Gibson wrote: > From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> > > The recently added pseries machine does not currently support PCI > emulation. For the (upcoming) kvm case, this is quite difficult to do > because the preferred HV mode for the host kernel does not allow MMIO > emulation (a hardware limitation). > > Therefore, to

On 17.05.2011, at 08:47, David Gibson wrote: > From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> > > The recently added pseries machine does not currently support PCI > emulation. For the (upcoming) kvm case, this is quite difficult to do > because the preferred HV mode for the host kernel does not allow MMIO > emulation (a hardware limitation). > > Therefore, to

The recent change to the declaration of idle_loop in domain.c fixed a compilation problem on gcc 3.4.2. Enclosed patch is another suggestion on how to solve that problem. Some further analysis, with much help from Jimmy Xenidis of IBM research, shows that the problem was not the declaration of the function as static void, but that the compiler is optimizing the function out of the assembled

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When