similar to: network (NAT?) problem

Hi, I have the following directory shared for the user "pcbadmin". He/she can mount and read/write without any difficulty: [pcbdata] comment = PCB Design Files path = /home/pcbadmin/pcbdata valid users = pcbadmin public = no writable = yes Question: How can I make the same directory only readable by the rest of the users ? TIA, Ben

Hi I am trying to stablish a relation between two different Samba domains. Each domain has two PDCs, all they are WINS servers, and the two domains are in different subnets. They are configured to use LDAP as the user/group/machine database. First, I will create the relation, being DOM1.CORP the trusted domain, and DOM2.CORP the trusting domain, so in a server of DOM1.CORP, I create a user this

Hi, well once u try lot and no good result is time to ask. My friends I want to make to domains running samba+ldap to share resources, I want to create a trust relation in two directions. Both domains have wins enable but are on different subnet. Domain Name: DOM1 Netbios Name = DOM1PDC 192.168.50.0/24 Domain Name: DOM2 Netbios Name = DOM2PDC 192.168.40.0/24 Both networks are separate,

> > > My friends I want to make to domains running samba+ldap to share > resources, I want to create a trust relation in two directions. Both > domains have wins enable but are on different subnet. MUST use the same WINS server for trusts to work. Why have two domains? > > > > Domain Name: DOM1 Netbios Name = DOM1PDC 192.168.50.0/24 > Domain Name: DOM2 Netbios

Hi, I tried to configure the new idmap interface. Currently without much success. I have two samba domains, trusting each other. Each PDC using it's own LDAP server. I tried idmap domains = DOM1, DOM2 idmap config DOM1:default = yes idmap config DOM1:backend = ldap idmap config DOM1:ldap_base_dn = ou=Idmap,dc=dom1,dc=mydomain,dc=de idmap config

I hope someone can answer this since my other emails have gone unanswered. I am using Samba 3.0.7 on both machines and am using LDAP. I believe that the trusts are working but I am still having a slight problem. I guess we'll use DOM1 and DOM2 for the domain names. DOM2 is trusting DOM1. If a DOM1 user tries to locally login to a DOM1 computer, it gives a "System could not log you

Hi, I have some problems with the following setup: DOM1 (PDC) -> DOM2 (PDC) <->DOM2(Member server) The users and groups from DOM1 (MS WinNT4 domain) are nicely visible on Samba PDC (DOM2) with established trust, but domain member server in DOM2 domain does not show any users from the DOM1 domain (only users from DOM2 are visible), BUT!! users from DOM1 can login to it and access shares

Hello all, We've been using samba version 3.0.4 on RH9 with success for quite a while now for shares on our domain (DOM1). Since this machine will have to be available in the near future in another domain (DOM2) as a webserver, and limited fileserver, another network interface has been added for the NIC. When browsing the shares from a WIN98SE computer in DOM2, we are able to see the

Hi, There is my network. =09 _____ Subnet:192.168.2.0 / \ Subnet: 192.168.1.0 Domain:DOM1=09without PDC | Swap |Domain: DOM2 with PDC <---------------------- \_____/ ---------------------> =09 I want to setup the machine(swap) for sharing file. The file on swap can read/write by the member of the DOM2 and= read only by the member of the DOM1. The DOM1

I have noticed the following behavior when testing out Samba 3.0.1 on RH9 with ldap authentication. Linux Samba V3.0.1 set up as PDC for domain DOM1 has a user test1. Two NT4 domains DOM2 and DOM3 also have a user called test1 with the same password as the user in DOM1 (all three users have the same username and password). All servers are on the same local subnet. When user1 does a logon to

Il 20/05/2015 10:44, David Gessel ha scritto: > Is there a way to completely disable caching on dovecot? Yes: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY -- Alessio Cecchi http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice

Hi, I have a Centos5 machine running xen 3.0.3-41 with two NICs each on its own subnet: 192.168.1.x and 192.168.0.x. All DomUs can talk to each other OK through two xen bridges. There are 3 DomUs: Dom0, Dom1 and Dom2 The scenario: I''m trying to capture packets on Dom2 on 192.168.0.x from external devices that are sending SIP stuff to Dom1, but fail to capture any packets. I

Can''t seem to fully boot a domU on either EM64T or Opteron with x86_64 xen-unstable. Both systems'' report this from xen: (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=872) Non-priv domain attempted WRMSR(00000000c0000100. (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=872) Non-priv domain attempted WRMSR(00000000c0000102. (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=880) Non-priv domain attempted RDMSR(00000000c0000080. They boot

Hi, Right now, the unprivileged account for privilege separation is only configurable at compile time (SSH_PRIVSEP_USER). I'd like to ask if it would be acceptable to have the account runtime configurable by adding something like PrivilegeSeparationAccount foo to sshd_config. The reason I'm asking is this. I'm working on a long overdue change to Cygwin which is supposed to get

Hi, This patch intends to accurate vcpu weighting for CPU intensive job. The reason of this problem is that vcpu round-robin queue blocks large weight vcpus by small weight vcpus. For example, we assume following case on 2pcpu environment. (with 4domains (each domain has 2vcpus)) dom1 vcpu0,1 w128 credit 4 dom2 vcpu0,1 w128 credit 4 dom3 vcpu0,1 w256 credit 8 dom4 vcpu0,1 w512 credit 15

Hello, I searched the mail list, but can''t find a solution. I have a machine with 8 cores. I want to set the CPU affinity for dom0. For example, let Dom0 use processor 0-3, let guests use 4-7 For guest domains, I can do this by setting the "cpus" For dom0. there''s no such option. The only one I know is in /etc/xen- config.sxp, which has "dom0-cpus" setting.

Hello, I don''t know if TCO is supported for XEN_NETDEV_FRONTED in kernel 3.1.6, however I found an issue. I had to track down an issue today: Packet from a local machine didn''t get routed to the internet. After long searching I found the issue: The TCP-Segmentation-offloading assembles fragments with Do Not Fragment set. This introduces issues when the packet is to be rerouted

Here are some more messages that pop in the server logs when I try to read folders on a Win2K file server - the folders/files were saved from a Macintosh on the network: smb_proc_readdir_long: name=\Font Library\B\Bernhard BoldCond. et al?\*, result=-2, rcls=1, err=123 smb_proc_readdir_long: name=\Font Library\K\Kino, et al?\*, result=-2, rcls=1, err=123 smb_proc_readdir_long: name=\Font

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >