similar to: activerecord table help please

Hi. I''m having a problem with my testing. The following table in my development database (MySQL 4.1.12, InnoDB): +-----------------------+------------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-----------------------+------------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ |

I''m using a db to log two types of events, link events and tag events. At first I had two tables, link_events & tag_events, but this seemed not very DRY because the only column that was different between them was link_id and tag_id respectively. So I made these tables: events: id int user_id int objtype_id int (holds ''1'' or ''2'' depending

N_conreq:entry { self->x=1; calledaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg3; callingaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg4; trace(calledaddr->link_id); tracemem(calledaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80); trace(callingaddr->link_id); tracemem(callingaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80); } 0 -> N_conreq 255

Hi, My work with Rails has been fairly straightforward, until yesterday... I''ve encountered rather a peculiar problem that I''m not able to solve myself as a rails-newbie. The model code looks like this: class Link < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :user_vote end class UserVote < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :link end I have a SQL query that is

Newbie to Asterisk I've been looking around for a little while, can't seem to find some sample configs for using a Cisco 7206 as a gateway. The below link is an initial plan of an Asterisk solution that may replace our Cisco Call Manager 3.1/ IPCC / IVR setup. We currently have all of the hardware below. Just take a peak and see if there is anything that is off base. I don't know

Hi List, I didn''t like the way store_location worked in rails. It doesn''t know you''ve pushed the "back" button, and it always returns to the top of a page. On a large page, the part you were looking at would no longer be on the screen. People try to deal with this using an AJAX hack, but it seems to me that the proper way to fix it is to store the return

I have a Newbee question: i have three tables and want to connect them. so is it stupid to make a triple m:n (rails style xs_ys_zs) or do i have to make a new table (newtable) where i got multiple 1:n? the habtm (has and belongs to many) do only work proper to join two tables, or i am wrong? -jens -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

What''s the current status of Markaby? I''ve played with it a bit and love it and am considering using it for a large project I''m starting. If you''ve used it, I''d love to hear your comments! Jamie

Hi, I''m trying to create a model where a few objects can all be linked to each other through a central linking table. Table structure is like this: -- model class Computer create table computers ( id serial, description varchar ); -- model Class user create table users ( id serial, name varchar ); -- model class Desk create table desks ( id serial, location varchar ); --

I''m trying to specify that a particular view must render two different partials. My spec looks like: describe AClass do it do template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => ''foo'', :locals => { ... }) ... end describe ''some conditional case'' do it do template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial =>

Hello - I am attempting to test rsync on a series of 8 MacOS X servers. On my initial test, I configured one machine as the "sender" and one machine to "receive." On the "sending" machine, I created an rsyncd.conf file. On the "receiving" machine, I issued the command rsync --daemon To which I got no error messages. On the "sending"

Gents, My heads been out of the sql game for too long (or it''s simply too early). I''m trying to extend the acts_as_taggable plugin (note: not gem) so that you can specify a list of tags you''re interested in, and the plugin will return only those items that are tagged with *all* these tags. The plugin uses primarily two tables: tags, to keep all the various tag

I''m trying to do a search that would exclude a value from it and return whatever results aren''t matched from the term, but it''s not working very well. None of these are working, they all return the results including the ones with tag_id = 701 tag_id:(NOT 701) tag_id:(! 701) tag_id:(- 701) But if I go the other way around it works (which I don''t want since

How would I change this method in order to get highlighting working with DRb? I''ve given up on searching on Google, I''m getting no results that are actually helpful. def self.find_storage_by_contents(query, options = {}) # Get the index that acts_as_ferret created for us index = self.aaf_index.ferret_index results = [] default_options = {:limit => 10,

Hello list, I''ve had this problem for two days now. Perhaps someone here would care to comment on it. I''d be REALLY appreciative if that''d be the case. Basically, it''s outlined at this paste: http://rafb.net/paste/results/ kXQSHZ83.html But I''ll paste it here, too. The main problem is in the customers/list action. The problem is with this line:

Hi, I am doing a research project on application frameworks (specifically the evaluation and selection of) and Rails is one of the key frameworks I am evaluating. Does anyone know of any case studies on RoR out on the Internet? Is anyone prepared to write up a case study for me on a project that succeeded thanks to the structure and dynamism of Rails? Only needs to be 1 page. Anyone who

Hi, I''m encountering another highlighting issue. (about the first one "range search and highlighting", i received no response. I don''t even know if somebody tried to reproduce and/or if it''s normal behavior) about the new issue, an example will be easier for you to reproduce: I''m filling an index with random data, i try to match for "*1*"

Hi, I have 2 tables as follows:- _________________ ________________ ____________ taggings | |stores | | tags | -----------------| |---------------| |------------| --tag_id | |--store_id | |tag_id | --store_id | |--store_name | |tag_name | --user_id | |---------------| |------------| -----------------| Now I want to execute

Hi to all. I''ve a very big problem. I know this can seem very loing, but please, try to read it. I have a simply blog, with posts and their comments. I''ve two tables in my db, posts, with post id, text and comments_count to store the number of comments-children of each post (as recomanded to do in AWDWR); and the table comments, with comment id, post_id for the post

Hello, I''ve been using Rails for years, including has_many :through and eager loading, but this one has me stumped. The problem is that Active Record is only eager-loading the first of many records. Here are the models (note set_table_name for a legacy schema): class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name ''tag'' end class DishTag < Tag has_many