similar to: Xen - multiCPUs per socket setting?

I''m still trying to figure out how to get my Xen installation on a 34-CPU machine (8 quad cores) to recognize more than one CPU per socket. It seems to default to one CPU per socket on this machine. Win2003ServerEnterprise will support 8 quad cores (32 CPUs) in a native install, but I can''t fathom why it won''t when installed under Xen (OpenSuSE11.0). Thanks for any

I have a big (8 quad core opterons) TYAN server with only the most basic mobo graphics capability and KDE under Xen is exceedingly slow and the attainable resolution is not very high. Is there wisdom on a particular card or chip that plays well with Xen (OpenSuSE 11.0)? THANK YOU! Patti _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi everyone, I'm trying to set up a Windows XP Pro client to connect to a Samba server (version 2.2.8) on a Redhat 8.0 linux box, but have been having trouble for the past 3 days. I have gone through Troubleshooting Samba at [http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/Samba24Hc13.pdf] but I can't figure out how to fix the problem. I suspect that the broadcast address may not be the same on both

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17742 Summary: Cannot rotate screen on the right Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

Is there a reason for jessie-cran3 rather than xenial? For Linux Mint 18 (admittedly not 18.1) I have deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ as one of the apt entries. JN On 2017-04-27 02:57 PM, Clive Nicholas wrote: > Okay folks, I give up and - frankly - I'm fed up! I thought I'd sorted all > this last week, but clearly not. I've tried using mirrors from

Okay folks, I give up and - frankly - I'm fed up! I thought I'd sorted all this last week, but clearly not. I've tried using mirrors from here in the UK, Ireland, France and the USA and whichever mirror I use, all I get is this: clive at climate ~ $ sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://ubuntu.mirrors.uk2.net/ubuntu xenial InRelease Ign:2 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable

icedtea-web package included with the distros is the plugin that handles javaws for firefox for both RHEL/CentOS 6 and 7 and openjdk. I have yet to find an app that cannot use openjdk instead of oracle java. It may be a little less streamlined, but it's functional. Ignore/cancel any pop ups that talk about updating java. If I missed this answer, I apologize as I receive the digests.

I am running Version 1.9.18p7 and I have a win95 machine and an NT machine connecting via ethernet. I have, for security reasons, reorganized my network to reduce outside threats. The network is set up using RFC1918 addressing, and I am using Linux 2.0.33 to transparent proxy outside requests to the net via a dialup PPP session with a dedicated IP address. The global section of my smb.conf

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:25:33PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:58:36PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > +struct virtio_vsock_buf { > > Please add a comment describing the purpose of this struct and to > differentiate its use from struct virtio_vsock_pkt. > Sure, I'll fix it. > > +static struct virtio_vsock_buf * > >

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:48:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/5/15 ??12:35, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:25:34AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2019/5/14 ??1:23, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:58:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2019/5/10 ??8:58, Stefano Garzarella

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Since virtio-vsock was introduced, the buffers filled by the host > > and pushed to the guest using the vring, are directly queued in > > a per-socket list. These buffers are preallocated by the guest > > with a fixed size (4 KB).

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:39:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > > > Assuming we miss nothing and buffers < 4K are broken, > > > I think we need to add this to the spec, possibly with > > > a feature bit to relax the requirement that all buffers > > > are at least 4k

On 2019/10/14 ??4:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE might have been useful for VMCI-specific > applications, but we should use SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF for portable > applications in the future. Those socket options also work with other > address families. > > I guess these sockopts are bypassed by AF_VSOCK because it doesn't use > the common skb

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:01:37PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Since virtio-vsock was introduced, the buffers filled by the host > >

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:42:25PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:35:39AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > (...) > > > > > > > The problem here is the compatibility. Before this series virtio-vsock > > > and vhost-vsock modules had the RX buffer

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Assuming we miss nothing and buffers < 4K are broken, > > I think we need to add this to the spec, possibly with > > a feature bit to relax the requirement that all buffers > > are at least 4k in size. > > > > Okay, should I send a proposal to virtio-dev at

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Assuming we miss nothing and buffers < 4K are broken, > > I think we need to add this to the spec, possibly with > > a feature bit to relax the requirement that all buffers > > are at least 4k in size. > > > > Okay, should I send a proposal to virtio-dev at

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:45:54AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:39:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > > > > > Assuming we miss nothing and buffers < 4K are broken, > > > > I think we need to add this to the spec, possibly with >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:49:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > Since virtio-vsock was introduced, the buffers filled by the host > >

Hi all, I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share. Easy or so I thought. As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set files group writable, however when I create a file from the client I'm always getting the mode 0644. Does anyone have a clue why? Thanks! client: