similar to: Different size with du and ls

Afternoon, We have an ocfs2 release 1.4 filesystem shared between two nodes (RHEL5). The filesystem in question is used exclusively for Oracle RMAN backups. A df -h shows the following: [root at imsthdb07 ~]# df -h /data/orabackup Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/eva_mpio_myserver07_08_oracle_bkup0 250G

Another simple question. How do I calculate the size of the volume from the superblock? Do I just use the two fields: u_int32_t s_blocksize_bits; /* Blocksize for this fs */ u_int32_t s_clustersize_bits; /* Clustersize for this fs */ What is the formula to use? Thanks, John

We are setting up 2 new EL5 U4 machines to replace our current database servers running our demo environment. We use 3Par SANs and their snap clone options. The current production system we snap clone from is EL4 U5 with ocfs2 1.2.9, the new servers have ocfs2 1.4.3 installed. Part of the refresh process is to run fsck.ocfs2 on the volume to recover, but right now as I am trying to run it on our

Just a quick question. What is the maximum and minimum volume sizes that OCFS2 supports? I'm working on doing a plugin for EVMS to support OCFS2. One of the functions needs that info. Thanks, John

Hi all, I created a OCFS2 volume with a block size of 4kB and a clustersize of 4kB. After I mounted the volume the first time there have been already over 600 MB in use. Then I started to copy a directory with a overall size of 1784 MB(measured on an XFS with "du"). After an hour about 4 GB(!) have been used on the OCFS2 volume so I stopped the copy. The files I copied are mostly

Hi there I recently installed an OCFS2 filesystem on our FC-SAN. Everything seemed to work fine and I could read & write the filesystem from both servers that are mounting it. After a while though, writes coming from one node do not appear on the other node and vice versa. I am not sure what's causing this, and not very experienced at debugging filesystems. If anybody has any

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:35:01PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > Hi, > Could you please share a reproducer? > Anyone could access & download the URL [1] (I wrote it in patch commit log) without register SUSE account. Please check attachment file, which I downloaded from [1] and modified under the BZ comment 1. The trigger method is also in comment 1, I copy here: ./defragfs_test.sh -d

Hi all We are using a 2 node cluster with drbd 8 (primary/primary state) and ocfs2. Reading a file on one node while it will be written on the other node is very slow. Reading a file on node while it will be written on the same node is fast. In the first case the node which wants to read the file has to ask the other to downgrade the locklevel. In my opinion this is a bottleneck, if the files are

Hello, I have found, that ocfs2 is very slow when doing I/O operation without cache. See a simple test: ng-vvv1:~# dd if=/data/verejna/dd-1G bs=1k | dd of=/dev/null 1048576+0 records in 1048576+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.183 s, 2.7 MB/s 2097152+0 records in 2097152+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.184 s, 2.7 MB/s The underlying block device is quite

This commit fixes three issues on non-auto defrag path (defragfs.ocfs2 doesn't set OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEFRAG on range.me_flags): - For ocfs2_find_victim_alloc_group(), old code forgot enlarge bitmap range for global_bitmap case. Old code could generate negative vict_bit. - For ocfs2_probe_alloc_group(), old code forgot back off move_len when finding enough bitmap space. Old code has

Hello. I plan to use OCFS2 + DRBD for email server. Problem: I use "seeker" for testing http://www.linuxinsight.com/how_fast_is_your_disk.html And get this: Results: 65 seeks/second, 15.23 ms random access time Then I do rm of many files - it fals to 10 seeks/second and performance is terrible. What can I do to increase it? What`s wrong? Below is many info. What we have: Debian

Hello, I'm writing from the otherside of the world from where my systems are, so details are coming in slow. We have a 6TB OCFS2 volume across 20 or so nodes all running OEL5.4 running ocfs2-1.4.4. The system has worked fairly well for the last 6-8 months. Something has happened over the last few weeks which has driven write performance nearly to a halt. I'm not sure how to proceed, and

This fixes three issues on move extents ioctl without auto defrag: a) In ocfs2_find_victim_alloc_group(), we have to convert bits to block first in case of global bitmap. b) In ocfs2_probe_alloc_group(), when finding enough bits in block group bitmap, we have to back off move_len to start pos as well, otherwise it may corrupt filesystem. c) In ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(), set me_threshold both for

Hi Mark/Joel, This is the v2 of bug fix for ocfs2_add_branch. Modification from V1 to V2: 1. Create a patch which return EROFS instead of BUG in ocfs2_insert_at_leaf. 2. Use ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records to change the root and extent blocks in the rightmost path. Regards, Tao

Now it's a good time to introduce the new tool 'o2info' since kernel part of OCFS2_IOC_INFO ioctl has been pulld upstream by linus. The following 6 patches have already got sunil's SOBs, and now they're trying to attract more reviewers before it goes to central repo with a modification of getting manual pages being introduced.

In ocfs2_add_branch, we use the rightmost rec of the leaf extent block to generate the e_cpos for the new added branch. In the most case, it is OK but if there is a gap between the the root(or branch) 's rightmost rec and the leaf, it will cause kernel panic if we insert some clusters in it. The message is something like: (7445,1):ocfs2_insert_at_leaf:3775 ERROR: bug expression:

Hi, All, These four patches are all related to ocfs2 on hard readonly mount. patch 1 fix oops when umount ocfs2 on hard readonly device. Because ocfs2_dismount_volume() will call ocfs2_cluster_hangup() and then call ocfs2_stack_driver_put(), will hit BUG_ON(active_stack == NULL). patch 2 fix oops when do ls or cat in ocfs2 on hard readonly device. Because ocfs2_open_lock() will call

Hi Mark/Joel, I meet with some meta allocation bugs when I implement reflink these days. And after some investigation, I think we should have the same problem when we have PAGE_SIZE > CLUSTER_SIZE. So I create a scenario today in one ppc box and try. the box panic as I expected. ;) The scenario is that: Create a file with the disk layout like this(with bs=512, and cs=4K). debugfs: stat

Hello list, I need understand more about cluster-size. Cluster size are small space when i create some file in ocfs2 disk, but when i read some data this size are small part that i can read? Or smal part are block-size to read? cluster-size are only to optimize fragmentation? I create my ocfs2 mounts with block-size 4k and cluster-size 1M and i have few files per filesystem with more than

Hi, We are trying to use OCFS2 as VM storage. After running into problems with qemu's disk_mirror feature we now think there could be a problem with the FIEMAP ioctl in OCFS2. As far as I understand the situation looks like this: Qemu inquiries the FS if the given section of the image is already allocated via the FIEMAP ioctl [1] It especially checks if fm_mapped_extents is greater 0.