similar to: slow file creation

Dear all, > Caveats > ======= > Features which OCFS2 does not support yet: > - extended attributes > - readonly mount > - shared writeable mmap > - loopback is supported, but data written will not > be cluster coherent. > - quotas > - cluster aware flock <---------------------------------------- >

I received the following error messages in the system logs. Is this anything to be concerned with? kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_populate_inode:234 ERROR: Invalid dinode: i_ino=1293597, i_blkno=1293597, signature = INODE01, flags = 0x0 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:389 ERROR: populate inode failed! i_blkno=1293597, i_ino=1293597 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_iget:131 ERROR: status = -116

Does anyone have any experience with Emulex HBA cards (LP10000) using OCFS2, Linux AS4 U4 x86_64 AMD? I'm trying to find out whether this is a verified combination, if anyone has successfully used it. I have that hardware/sofware combination, and am experiencing stability/performance/panic/hang issues with OCFS2. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all. I have a 50 GB OCFS2 file system. I'm currently using ~26GB of space but df is reporting 43 GB used. Any ideas how to find out where the missing 17GB is at? The file system was formatted with a 16K cluster & 4K block size. Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello All, I am currently running ocfs 1.0.9-9 with kernel 2.4.21-4.Elhugemem (RHEL3) and 9i RAC (9.2.0.4). Is there any big concerns I need to be aware of before upgrading to ocfs-1.0.13-1 and kernel 2.4.20-31.9? TIA, +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | Brian M. Diehl, RHCE A-1 Limousine | | Sr. Network Admin 609-919-2019 | | "In the end, things

Looking for any ideas where I need to look to fix this: I'm installing RHEL3 AS (update 4) on Dell PowerEdge 6850's. I've installed the hugemem kernels on these boxes and need to install and run ocfs. Kernel: ------- 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELhugemem Loaded the ocfs rpm's --------------------- # rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.14-1 ocfs-support-1.1.5-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

I four nodes setup to do active-backup bonding and the drivers loaded for the bonded network interfaces vary between tg3 and e100. All interfaces with the e100 driver loaded report errors much like what you see here: bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2, disabling it e100: eth2: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for

Hi, I just deploy the ZFS on an SAN attach disk array and it''s working fine. How do i get dual pathing advantage of the disk ( like DMP in Veritas). Can someone point to correct doc and setup. Thanks in Advance. Rgds Vikash Gupta This message posted from opensolaris.org

CEBA-2006:0413-001 CentOS 4 i386 drbd - bugfix update (EXTRAS Only) This is a drbd bugfix update. The following are the fixes from the previous version: 0.7.17 (api:77/proto:74) ----- * There was a bug that could cause the activity log to be not applied after a primary crash, when an other size than 127 elements was configured. * There was a bug in the activity log code, that could cause

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 Summary: ip_conntrack_ftp.o: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo:

I am trying to update a centos box with an unsupported kernel (for XFS support): [root at snowybunting /]# uname -a Linux snowybunting.homelinux.net 2.6.9-34.106.unsupportedsmp #1 SMP Sat Mar 18 16:22:41 CST 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux To update I did: yum update python-sqlite yum clean all yum update yum yum clean all yum update ..and I get the following > 91 packages excluded

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello, It is not total off-topic since almost all connected servers will be RHEL and CentOS. :) We are considering to purchase new storage system. The most probably we will be choosing between HP (EVA6000), EMC (CX3-20C) and Hitachi (similar model). iSCSI connection is also required. What are your experienced with listed systems? What to avoid? What ot expect? Now I just know

List, I have attempted to make my own megaraid driver disk for a Dell PowerEdge 2300. The procedure I'm using is detailed at the end of this message. In short, I followed samples that I collected after Googling around. The problem I face is that the CentOS 4 installer can't seem to mount the driver disk after I have created it. It gives no information other than, "Cannot

Hi All, I have an "appliance" cd which uses CentOS 4.0 (Final) which I am trying to load on a new Dell 1950 server with a SAS driver controller. During the install it fails to find any disks to load to. I got the drivers from Dell and dd the correct one to a floppy, boot from the appliance cd and enter linux dd at the prompt. I load the driver in the install and it still fails to find

Will there be a matching DRBD kernel module package for the latest kernel that is in the updates repository? The kernel version in the updates is: kernel-smp-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.i686.rpm but I don't see a matching DRBD module in updates. Thanks, Steve

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2005:1130-2 CentOS 4 i386 drbd / heartbeat - Enhancement Update (Extras Only) We are pleased to add drbd (with integrated heartbeat) to the CentOS extras repository. DRBD is a block device which is designed to build high availability clusters. This is done by mirroring a whole block device via (a dedicated) network. You could see it as a network raid-1.

Okay, the jist of this whole thing, I get this infamous (?) problem, I have been trying to search though the archives of samba-general on gmane and also in my archive of this list. I have only seen requests for the magical answer. Environment: W2K/W2K3 mixed ADS going Native ADS only soon. Samba 3.0.4 compiled from source on a RHEL AS30 machine. MIT Kerberos v1.3.4 also compiled from source.

If anyone is running this configuration, I have some questions for you about Page83 data errors. This message posted from opensolaris.org