similar to: Новое сообщение

All, We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.2.9-1 for RHEL4 and RHEL5 on x86, x86_64, ppc64 and ia64 architectures. This release includes bug fixes, most of which have been backported from the mainline kernel. Some of the more interesting ones have been described in detail. For the full list of changes, please refer to the news.

All, We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.2.9-1 for RHEL4 and RHEL5 on x86, x86_64, ppc64 and ia64 architectures. This release includes bug fixes, most of which have been backported from the mainline kernel. Some of the more interesting ones have been described in detail. For the full list of changes, please refer to the news.

Does this release also include what our DBA referenced below regarding indexed directories fix? Thanks,? ? George Burgos Linux Systems Administrator LPIC I/OCA-DBA Senior Systems Analyst Powell Industries, Inc. gburgos at powellind.com Tel:???????? (713)947-4493 Fax:??????? (713)943-1268 -----Original Message----- From: Hu, Linn Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:20 PM To: OracleDBA; _LinuxAdmins

Good News. Thanks. > -----????----- > ???: ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com > [mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] ?? Gang He > ????: 2019?3?20? 18:07 > ???: ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com; ocfs2-tools-devel at oss.oracle.com; > ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com > ??: [Ocfs2-users] o2locktop introduction > > Hello Guys, > > We wrote a tool with

Good News. Thanks. > -----????----- > ???: ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com > [mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] ?? Gang He > ????: 2019?3?20? 18:07 > ???: ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com; ocfs2-tools-devel at oss.oracle.com; > ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com > ??: [Ocfs2-users] o2locktop introduction > > Hello Guys, > > We wrote a tool with

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060315/9e72c36b/attachment.html

All, Just to let you all know that packages for OCFS2 1.4.2-1 are available for EL5 U4 and RHEL5 U4. http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2009-September/001140.html http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/RedHat/RHEL5/ We will not be releasing packages for OCFS2 1.2 for (RH)EL5 U4. Users still on OCFS2 1.2 and looking to upgrade to the (RH)EL5 U4 should upgrade the file system to OCFS2

All, Just to let you all know that packages for OCFS2 1.4.2-1 are available for EL5 U4 and RHEL5 U4. http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2009-September/001140.html http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/RedHat/RHEL5/ We will not be releasing packages for OCFS2 1.2 for (RH)EL5 U4. Users still on OCFS2 1.2 and looking to upgrade to the (RH)EL5 U4 should upgrade the file system to OCFS2

Hi, I have 2 questions : 1. OCFS2 works on which schema. 2. If i run my rac on OCFS2 and i need to restore my datafile in other database which is runing on ASM , Is that possible? If yes how? Thanks & regards Suvankar --- On Thu, 3/11/10, ocfs2-users-request at oracle.com <ocfs2-users-request at oracle.com> wrote: > From: ocfs2-users-request at oracle.com <ocfs2-users-request

All, We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.4.10-1 and OCFS2 tools 1.6.3-2 for Oracle Linux 5 Update 7 and higher and Redhat Enterprise Linux 5 Update 7 and higher. Oracle's Unbreakable Linux Network users who are subscribing to the "OCFS2 1.4 packages for Enterprise Linux 5" channel can upgrade to this release by running up2date. Red Hat's Enterprise Linux 5

I think I might have miss understood where it is failing, has this file been added to the DB on the web site or does it fail when you try to onfigure this? Carle Simmonds Infrastructure Consultant Technology Services Experian UK Ltd __________________________________________________ Tel: +44 (0)115 941 0888 (main switchboard) Mobile: +44 (0)7813 854834 E-Mail: carle.simmonds at uk.experian.com

We are also thinking about locking for each read/write, but would its = overhead be too high? We have another idea that is extending the function of flock, lockf, = fcntl to distributed. So any application that need strict data consistent can do a lock = operation on the whole or part of the file. For ordinary application, maybe the current logic is enough. How about it? >-----Original

Dear all, > Caveats > ======= > Features which OCFS2 does not support yet: > - extended attributes > - readonly mount > - shared writeable mmap > - loopback is supported, but data written will not > be cluster coherent. > - quotas > - cluster aware flock <---------------------------------------- >

I'm trying to compile ocfs2-1.4.1 in on my system and it's not working very well. This is what is happening after running the following: Is there a patch for this? Or what could be wrong? ./configure --with-kernel=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.22.19-vs2.3.0.34.1- x86_64 ; make make -C fs make[1]: Entering directory `/root/ocfs2-1.4.1/fs' make -C ocfs2 stamp-md5 make[2]: Entering directory

/dev/rawctl is part of the "raw block device" driver interface. You need to turn on the raw device driver option (CONFIG_RAW_DRIVER) in your kernel build. I have always created a new file system from my 2.4 kernel (that has all possible modules built and properly configured to load when needed), so I don't know for sure if mkfs.ocfs will work correctly after turning on the raw

This bug has the same reproduce step as below. the dir2 has no S_ISGID set. see bug 131. >-----Original Message----- >From: ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com=20 >[mailto:ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Ling, Xiaofeng >Sent: 2004=C4=EA8=D4=C218=C8=D5 9:45 >To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com >Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [BUG] LTP:mkdir try to inherits group id failed >

I also sent this to OCFS2-devel but no response so far. So... I noticed that OCFS2 got updated in the last few days. I just tried to do a build and got this: [root@linuxjohn2 trunk]# make make -C src make[1]: Entering directory `/root/ocfs2/trunk/src' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `inc/io.h', needed by `alloc.c'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/ocfs2/trunk/src'

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix defrag path triggering jbd2 ASSERT to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory. If

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix defrag path triggering jbd2 ASSERT to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory. If

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix defrag path triggering jbd2 ASSERT to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory. If