similar to: Feedback from model callbacks

Hi Gabor, Could you give a little more detailed description of the plan with the user-diet changes? I read the README but still don't have a good picture of what will happen. Specifically, which operators new/delete will be overridden? What work will they do? How will the surrogate getters/setters work? Thanks, Dan

> Hi Gabor, > > Could you give a little more detailed description of the plan > with the user-diet changes? I read the README but still don't > have a good picture of what will happen. > > Specifically, which operators new/delete will be overridden? > What work will they do? How will the surrogate getters/setters > work? > > Thanks, > > Dan

Here''s my review of Chapter 3: As the author says, this is a transitional chapter. The first chapter was an introduction to Ruby, and the second was a similar introduction to Rails. Now we begin the real purpose of the book, which is to dig into the Ruby behind the Rails. Periodically the question arises on this list about how much Ruby you need to know in order to do Rails.

I''m trying my best to follow the skinny controller/fat model concept, and I''ve got a series of callbacks (that I''m about to move into observers) running on a few models. Based on what these callbacks do to the data (it''s implementing business rules), I''d like to add some type of message on the state of the model *without* invalidating it. For example:

I have a model (accessed restfully) named TranscoderQueue, it''s name is overridden to ''TransocderQueue'' so it is accessed as ''/ transocder_queue'' as opposed to ''/transocder_qeueus''. class TranscoderQueue < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :campaign, :class_name => "Campaign", :foreign_key => "campaign_id"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

On 1 December 2011 17:15, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> I'm running LLVM under threadsanitizer >> (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/) to find and remove races in >> a larger program that uses LLVM as a library. One of the things that I >> found is that the TargetOptions are all

One task I'm working on is to make the managed node more generic, so that it can be leveraged by other hypervisor managers in the same way that it is managed by the ovirt-wui. One thing I'm considering doing is to add a new configuration file to the node, /etc/sysconfig/node-config. This will be a central point for defining specific elements, such as management servers, user names, etc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc2 June 10, 2008 ================================= This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc2 June 10, 2008 ================================= This is the second release candidate of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.

On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > I'm running LLVM under threadsanitizer > (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/) to find and remove races in > a larger program that uses LLVM as a library. One of the things that I > found is that the TargetOptions are all global; you could create a > TargetMachine targeting ARM and X86 in two threads, but they both have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: libnftnl 1.2.7 libnftnl is a userspace library providing a low-level netlink programming interface (API) to the in-kernel nf_tables subsystem. This library is currently used by nftables. This release contains fixes only: * Avoid potential use-after-free when clearing set's expression list * Avoid misc buffer overflows in attribute

I wrote: > I think it's a bug. Or at least QueryParser uses a rather delicate rule > for when to add a ":" between the prefix and the term, which scriptindex > doesn't implement. The rule is undocumented (except in the code) so > it's arguable who is correct. I've been looking at this some more. We need some way to distinguish the term prefix from the term

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Hope you're assuming there's always a single copy of common_flags in > the process. > This isn't the case for e.g. ASan+UBSan on Mac, but that's a broken setup. > > What if we let the tools protect specific flags (by adding a bool to > each flag) once they set their values

Hi all, I''m trying to overwrite a setter method, but am running into some difficulties. This is normally really easy when overwriting a setter for a table column, but in this case it is the setter for an associated object. Here''s a hypothetical example: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user

Hi, this patch adds: - kate support (what else) - this bumps the Javascript API to 1.1 - a few build fixes (note that the adding of -L/usr/X11/lib -lX11 looks suspect to me, that shouldn't be needed, so you may want to leave it out if you think so as well - it's odd as X11 using programs do configure fine on that box) - bad pointer dereference fix (mouse callback) - avoid the input

Any thoughts on this one guys? How do I reinitialize an already initialized model object in my controller in one shot rather than manually initializing each attribute? In other words, I do a find like so: user = User.find(id) # Now I want to reinitialize the user object by using the params["user"] but I''d like to intialize it in a way that calls my model''s equality