similar to: Validating two models

Hello, i installed zfs-auto-snapshot with Samba/Windows Shadow Copy. If the share contains "path = /srv/userdata/" it runs for me. But if I use "path = /srv/userdata/%U" I get no "Previous Versions" on my Win10 Client. I think the problem is the variable "shadow: snapdir = .zfs/snapshot". I tried with "shadow: snapdir = ../.zfs/snapshot" and

The API changes from: int nbd_add_close_callback (struct nbd_handle *h, nbd_close_callback cb, void *user_data); to: int nbd_add_close_callback (struct nbd_handle *h, void *user_data, nbd_close_callback cb); The second way is consistent with how other callbacks work

Hello, @users = User.find(:all, :include => {:user_data => :user_data_field}, :order => "username = ''someone-oHC15RC7JGTNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org'' desc", :limit => 50) This produces: User Load IDs For Limited Eager Loading (74.648762) SELECT * FROM (SELECT DISTINCT ON (users.id) users.id, username AS alias_0 FROM users LEFT OUTER JOIN

On 8/13/19 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The definition of functions that take a callback is changed so that > the callback and user_data are combined into a single structure, eg: > > int64_t nbd_aio_pread (struct nbd_handle *h, > void *buf, size_t count, uint64_t offset, > - int (*completion_callback) (/*..*/), void *user_data, > +

On 8/12/19 11:08 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This adds a C-only semi-private function for freeing various types of > persistent data passed to libnbd. > > There are some similarities with nbd_add_close_callback which we > removed in commit 7f191b150b52ed50098976309a6af883d245fc56. > --- > +=head1 FREE CALLBACKS > + > +B<Note:> The API described in this

On 7/16/19 6:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > A Closure is a list of (usually one, but can be more) closures. In C > there is also a singe ‘void *user_data’ parameter which is passed by > the caller into the function and through as the first parameter of > each callback invocation. > > By grouping the previously separate Opaque and Callback* parameters > together we can

Hi there, I?m having difficulties reading the content of some rows in my database. Tried to use some of the code at page 221 in the pickaxe, but didn?t make it work. The SQL query works fine directly against the database. mysql> select id, count, company from users where name = "martin"; +----+-------+------------+ | id | count | company | +----+-------+------------+ | 1 |

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:08:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > More thoughts on callbacks, etc. following on from: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00184 > > > > Closure lifetimes > > ----------------- Here's a possibly better idea which still

This has an annoying subtlety around the fact that we can pass a single user_data and multiple closures in one function call. The LIBNBD_CALLBACK_FREE function would be called several times with the same user_data in this case, which means the callback must do some kind of reference counting before the user_data can be freed. I propose that we split up Closure so it describes a single closure,

Hello, I have a difficulty with the option 'hide unreadable' in the smb.conf regarding to it's effect on my Vista machines. In the smb.conf I have declared the following share: [userdata] path = /data/userdata admin users = domain+adminuser browseable = yes writeable = yes hide unreadable = yes csc policy = disable The

On 7/16/19 10:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/16/19 10:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> The API changes from: >> >> int nbd_add_close_callback (struct nbd_handle *h, >> nbd_close_callback cb, >> void *user_data); >> >> to: >> >> int nbd_add_close_callback (struct nbd_handle

On 7/24/19 7:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are > persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for > the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent > closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as > the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures

On 7/24/19 7:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In preparation for closure lifetimes, split up the Closure so it no > longer describes a list of closures, but a single callback. > > This changes the API because functions which take 2 or more closures > now pass a separate user_data for each one. > --- > docs/libnbd.pod | 3 +- >

i am trying to generate a pdf of all of the users in an application that i have built. i am still pretty new to ruby and rails so i don''t know the best way to go about it. here is my controller code: require ''pdf/writer'' require ''pdf/simpletable'' class ReportsController < ApplicationController def test _pdf = PDF::Writer.new table =

Hello all! I am new to the mailing lists, as well as Samba. I was looking for an Active Directory alternative for linux, and finally landed on Samba4. My installation is alpha12, installed via apt on Ubuntu 10.10. I am trying to create roaming profiles, however, if "path = /UserData" then the profiles are viewable from every user account by simple accessing "

I'm having troubles with getting rsync 2.5.5 (CYGWIN version) to include/exclude files they way I expect it to. I have mulled over the list postings and man pages regarding this and I am either missing something or ... well I don' know. I have a drive with 12 folders in the root however, I only want to rsync 5 of them (the ones marked with an *) and in those 4 I want to exclude certain

When we introduced valid_flags, there was an incentive to do as few callbacks as possible, favoring cb(VALID|FREE) calls over the sequence cb(VALID);cb(FREE). To make it work, we set .callback=NULL after an early free, so that the later check during retirement didn't free again. But now that our .free callback is distinct from our other callbacks, there is no longer an advantage to bundling

We have a client that has sporadic problems with the *8 pickup facility. The server they are using is 1.8.5 and they are using Snom phones. Every now and then when they try to do a pickup from another phone they get a forbidden message on the phone and I can see the following in the logs. [Aug 8 11:51:53] ERROR[19314] astobj2.c: user_data is NULL [Aug 8 11:51:53] ERROR[19314] astobj2.c:

hello, i've set up a domain controller to replace a production server. both servers use profile redirection for all user environment directories. my problem is that when logging onto the new domain and server, windows will create in the %userprofile% local directory an Application Directory containing Microsoft/Credentials/*SID*, although a copy exists on the server. this directory is used

More thoughts on callbacks, etc. following on from: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00184 Closure lifetimes ----------------- Closures could have a lifetime if we had a little bit of support from the C library. We would generate (from C only): nbd_set_free_<fn>_<closure> (nbd, free_closure); which calls free_closure (user_data) as soon as the