similar to: [PATCH 9-10/10] Quota support for disabling sparse feature

Hi, this is the next version of quota support for quota tools. I've addressed all the comments of Tao, Joel and others. Sparse feature disabling also correctly updates quota information now and the patch is merged into the tunefs support patch. Honza

Hi, below comes a new version of the series of patches implementing quota support for ocfs2-tools. I've fixed the calls of ocfs2_malloc_blocks() which were given number of bytes instead of number of blocks. Besides that the series should be the same. Honza

Hi, I'm sending a series of patches implementing quota support into ocfs2-tools. It's the same as the original huge patch I've sent but now it's split as Joel asked. I've also realized that when disabling SPARSE feature, we should update quota information. That piece of code is missing, I'll implement it soon. Comments welcome. Honza

Add online resize in tunefs.ocfs2 so that user can increase the volume when it is mounted.

Now it's a good time to introduce the new tool 'o2info' since kernel part of OCFS2_IOC_INFO ioctl has been pulld upstream by linus. The following 6 patches have already got sunil's SOBs, and now they're trying to attract more reviewers before it goes to central repo with a modification of getting manual pages being introduced.

Hi all, This patch set adds batched discard support to ocfs2. Please check. Thanks. Regards, Tao

Before we start accessing a huge (> 16 TiB) OCFS2 volume, we need to confirm that its journal supports 64-bit offsets. So we need to check the journal's feature bits before recovering the journal. This is not possible with JBD2 at present, because the journal superblock (where the feature bits reside) is not loaded from disk until the journal is recovered. This patch loads the journal

I'm impressed that I was able to whip this out in just one day of hacking. Below, I'll include a diff between the plugin and the filter as of patch 1, if it aids review. Eric Blake (3): filters: Add ext2 filter ext2: Deprecate ext2 plugin ext2: Add mode for letting client exportname choose file from image TODO | 5 - configure.ac

Hi I have an ocfs2 volume (1.4.1) on lvm2, which is made available on 2 nodes via dual primary drbd that is on it. I wanted to backup my volume, so naturally I made a snapshot of it via the lvm2, and tried to mount it for backing up. However, I got the following error in dmesg : [319981.478168] (23483,0):ocfs2_fill_super:700 ERROR: Unable to create per-mount debugfs root. I then searched

I am working currently on cloning on a regular basis our production OCFS2 volumes to our test environment. For the database (Oracle 10G R2 RAC) we put it into backup mode, then execute a Snapclone on our 3Par SAN. Then we use RemoteCopy and SnapClone to our development 3Par SAN. To recover the OCFS2 volume I got through the following steps: Stop database umount /export/<volume name> Log

We have a test 10gR2 RAC cluster using ocfs2 filesystems for the Clusterware files and the Database files. We need to increase the node slots to accomodate new RAC nodes. Is it true that we will need to umount these filesystems for the upgrade (i.e. Database and Clusterware also)? We are planning to use the following command format to perform the node slot increase: # tunefs.ocfs2 ?N 3

Hi! When i'm running debugfs.ocfs2 i get the following result: debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdb Revision: 0.90 Mount Count: 0 Max Mount Count: 20 State: 0 Errors: 0 Check Interval: 0 Last Check: Mon May 10 12:17:37 2010 Creator OS: 0 Feature Compat: 3 backup-super strict-journal-super Feature Incompat: 8016 sparse

I need add extra 2 nodes into current 3 nodes ocfs2 file system which means 5 nodes share this file system after it. I think this file system creates by mkfs.ocfs2 -b .. -N 4 .. which only allows 4 nodes. Questions: 1. How to verify parameter when this file system created? In this case, it is 4 nodes. 2. I assume I have to recreate the files system which will lost contains, if I use

Just checking to be sure this isn''t a known bug or problem. I couldn''t find a bz for this, but it would appear that tunefs.lustre --print fails on a lustre mdt or ost device if mounted with mmp. Is this expected behavior? TIA mds1-gps:~ # tunefs.lustre --print /dev/mapper/mdt1 checking for existing Lustre data: not found tunefs.lustre FATAL: Device /dev/mapper/mdt1 has not

One of ocfs2 filesystem has some errors. 1. fsck.ocfs2 informs me that : "I/O error on channel while reading .. " It was NOT TRUE - I was able to read and write entire storage over the network multiple times. 2. becouse of CRC errors and suggestion to disable metaecc I run tunefs.ocfs2 --fs-features=nometaecc /dev/xxx funefs allocate 9,89 GB of virtual memory and 95% of

Hi, Our lustre environment is: 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL_lustre.1.6.3smp I would like to change recovery timeout from default value 250s to something longer I tried example from manual: set_timeout <secs> Sets the timeout (obd_timeout) for a server to wait before failing recovery. We performed that experiment on our test lustre installation with one OST. storage02 is our OSS [root at

Does anybody knows if is there a certified procedure in to backup a RAC DB 10.2.0.3 based on OCFS2 , via split mirror or snaphots technology ? Using Linux LVM and OCFS2, does anybody knows if is possible to dinamically extend an OCFS filesystem, once the underlying LVM Volume has been extended ? Thanks in advance Riccardo Paganini

As part of adding support for OCFS2 to mount huge volumes, we need to check that the sector_t and page cache of the system are capable of addressing the entire volume. An identical check already appears in ext3 and ext4. This patch moves the addressability check into its own function in fs/libfs.c and modifies ext3 and ext4 to invoke it. Signed-off-by: Patrick LoPresti <lopresti at

Hi all, I upgraded ocfs from 1.2 to 1.4 after the update I launched tunefs.ocfs2 to enable the new ocfs2 features (sparse files and unwritten extents). tunefs.ocfs2 is now running since 2 days (12T partition) and I need my system back to production, can I safety abort tunefs.ocfs2? thanks Nicola

Hi, Recently I've decided to play with gjournal. Main reason was a promise of avoiding full fsck check after unclean shutdown. I've successfuly configured gjournal on existing filesystems (all UFS). And then it happened - my system had a power failure. After boot, it forced me to run fsck manualy. Nothing special, I did it before... But this time it failed on gjournaled disks.