similar to: [PATCH] ocfs2/trivial: Code cleanup of ocfs2_mount_volume.

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 7b50567bdcad8925ca1e075feb7171c12015afd1 commit: 0737e01de9c411e4db87dcedf4a9789d41b1c5c1 ocfs2: ocfs2_mount_volume does cleanup job before return error config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230329 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230401/202304012244.gX4H4rBO-lkp at intel.com/config) compiler:

Hi, I believe the following patch in the GIT - 2.6.17-rc5 is not correct: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=75616cf9854b83eb83a968b1338ae0ee11c9673c It is the second of the two patches contributed by Leonid Ananiev. This one incorrectly adds the super block unlocking in the error path, though. As we can see in the function ext3_group_add() the

Hi list, I am experimenting with ocfs2 (rpm package: 1.2.2-0.2), using linux-ha 2.0.8 (all running on a SLES 10 x86-64, rpm packages from linux-ha.org) for the heartbeat. The three nodes are connected on a gigabit switch. From time to time I have problems to unmount a drive, and I have to reboot the whole system to fix the problem. When these lockups occur, I see these messages in

All, Please review the patches backported to 1.4 from mainline. Sunil

In ocfs2_expand_inline_dir, we calculate whether we need 1 extra cluster if we can't store the dx inline the root and save it in dx_alloc. So add it when we call ocfs2_reserve_clusters. Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c index e71160c..07d8920 100644

When we set/clear the dyn_features for an inode we hold the ip_lock. So do it when we set/clear OCFS2_INDEXED_DIR_FL also. Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c index 07d8920..8e0f370 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c @@ -2463,8 +2463,10 @@

This node rebooted due to a kernel panic and we are not able to mount the ocfs2 filesystems after that. Please help [root at guard0 ~]# /etc/init.d/o2cb online Loading module "configfs": OK Mounting configfs filesystem at /sys/kernel/config: OK Loading module "ocfs2_nodemanager": OK Loading module "ocfs2_dlm": OK Loading module "ocfs2_dlmfs": OK Mounting

Hi All, I have a cluster of four nodes and one will not join the cluster. I have two IPs on each node, one external and one internal. I have tried changing around the IPs in the /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf and that helped - at least I recovered three of the machines. Any suggestions on where else to look? Best Regards John (23359,2):o2net_connect_expired:1637 ERROR: no connection established with

All, We are having some problems getting OCFS2 to run, we are using kernel 2.6.15 with OCFS2 1.2.1. Compiling the OCFS2 sources went fine and all modules load perfectly. However, we can only mount the OCFS2 volume on one machine at a time, when we try to mount the volume on the 2 other machines we get an error stating that another node is heartbeating in our slot. When we mount the volume

Does anyone have any idea what to try next? Here are the steps I have taken and the problem: (I wanted to post my question on the first line before I explained the problem and what I have tried) ---------- Node 0 has the file system mounted just fine and works great. When trying to mount on Node 1: `mount.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/data /cluster/ data` I get this error after about 30 seconds:

Hey guys, I have a OCFS2 Cluster mounted at 4 xen-server (gentoo). Today I upgraded the xen-kernel for tests at one server (server2) from 2.6.34-xen to 2.6.38-xen-r1. After reboot the server couldn''t mount the ocsfs2 device anymore. ocfs2-tools version: sys-fs/ocfs2-tools-1.4.3 Modules are loaded and /config type configfs and /dlm type ocfs2_dlmfs are mounted. server2 ~ # mount

I am attempting to setup a 2 node ocfs2 cluster. At this point, I have the latest 1.2.1 version of the tools on both nodes. They are not running identical kernels (one is 2.6.16.18, the other is 2.6.17.1) both are using the kernels built in OCFS2 modules, not using from source. I can mount my iscsi volume on either node individually, but when I attempt to mount two nodes, I get the following

This fixes the "i_blocks went wrong when the disk filled up" problem. In ext3_new_block() we increment i_blocks early, so the quota operation can be performed outside lock_super(). But if the block allocation ends up failing, we forget to undo the allocation. This is not a serious bug, and probably does not warrant an upgrade for production machines. Its effects are: 1) errors are

Hallo, I have two servers and both are connected to external array, each by own SAS connection. I need these servers to work simultaneously with data on array and I think that ocfs2 is suitable for this purpose. One server is P4 Xeon (Gentoo linux, i386, 2.6.22-r2) and second is Opteron (Gentoo linux, x86_64, 2.6.22-r2). Servers are connected by ethernet, adapters are both Intel

This patch fixes the data loss which can occur when unmounting a data=journal ext3 filesystem. The core problem is that the VFS doesn't tell the filesystem enough about what is happening. ext3 _needs_ to know the difference between regular memory-cleansing writeback and sync-for-data-integrity purposes. (These two operations are really quite distinct, and the kernel has got it wrong for

It would be nice to know how often we get checksum failures. Even better, how many of them we can fix with the single bit ecc. So, we add a statistics structure. The structure can be installed into debugfs wherever the user wants. For ocfs2, we'll put it in the superblock-specific debugfs directory and pass it down from our higher-level functions. The stats are only registered with

Hi, I'm trying to compile ocfs2 1.2.6 on a 2.6.21 kernel (with rsbac and pax patches), but I can't get this to work .. In 2.6.20 there was an change in the definition of the INIT_WORK macro (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/5/269) this seems to cause my problems (see below) but even after removing the third parameter of the INIT_WORK calls the compile fails (see second compile failure). Can

Hello! Hey didnt a setting for the 10 second network timeout get into the 2.6.20 kernel? if so how do we set this? I am getting OCFS2 1.3.3 (2201,0):o2net_connect_expired:1547 ERROR: no connection established with node 1 after 10.0 seconds, giving up and returning errors. (2458,0):dlm_request_join:802 ERROR: status = -107 (2458,0):dlm_try_to_join_domain:950 ERROR: status = -107

Linus, et al, Here are the ocfs2 updates for 2.6.31. It's a quiet cycle, almost completely composed of fixes. There is a nice performance improvement from Hisashi Hifumi for fdatasync. Please pull. Joel The following changes since commit b4348f32dae3cb6eb4bc21c7ed8f76c0b11e9d6a: Linus Torvalds (1): Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs are available in

While compiling two kernels and untarring a third, my root fs was remounted r/w and I got the following in dmesg (kernel 2.4.19-pre9): EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Aborting journal on device ide0(3,2). ext3_abort called EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal. Remounting filesystem read-only Remounting filesystem read-only