similar to: [PATCH] ocfs2: Fix a missing credit when deleting from indexed directories.

Linus, et al, Here are the outstanding ocfs2 fixes we have for 2.6.30. The important ones are journal credit fixes for the new indexed directories. There's also MAINTAINERS update for my ocfs2 git tree. Please pull. Joel The following changes since commit 612392307cb09e49051225092cbbd7049bd8db93: Ryusuke Konishi (1): nilfs2: support nanosecond timestamp are available in the

Anyone else seen this? (25736,1):ocfs2_query_inode_wipe:882 ERROR: Inode 129047 (on-disk 129047) not orphaned! Disk flags 0x1, inode flags 0x80 (25736,1):ocfs2_delete_inode:1010 ERROR: status = -17 Test case is my patched version of ocfs2-test/programs/dirop_file_racer that allows long filename prefixes. I ran it on two nodes in separate directories. Filesystem has a 512B blocksize, and I

There is no need to start the inode update transactions before/while verifying the input flags. As a refinement, this patch delay the transactions utill the pre-check up is ok. Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> --- fs/ocfs2/ioctl.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9

As halflife demonstrated in Phrack 50 with his linspy project, it is trivial to patch any system call under Linux from within a module. This means that once your system has been compromised at the root level, it is possible for an intruder to hide completely _without_ modifying any binaries or leaving any visible backdoors behind. Because such tools are likely to be in use within the hacker

Ooops, last one didn't CC ocfs2-devel. On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:16:15PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > @@ -232,25 +231,17 @@ int ocfs2_populate_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_dinode *fe, > ocfs2_mount_local(osb) || !ocfs2_stack_supports_plocks()) > use_plocks = 0; > > - /* this means that read_inode cannot create a superblock inode > - * today. change if

code path: ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents ocfs2_move_extents ocfs2_defrag_extent __ocfs2_move_extent + ocfs2_journal_access_di + ocfs2_split_extent //sub-paths call jbd2_journal_restart + ocfs2_journal_dirty //crash by jbs2 ASSERT crash stacks: PID: 11297 TASK: ffff974a676dcd00 CPU: 67 COMMAND: "defragfs.ocfs2" #0 [ffffb25d8dad3900] machine_kexec at ffffffff8386fe01

While adding a file into orphan dir in ocfs2_orphan_add(), it calls __ocfs2_add_entry() before ocfs2_journal_access_di(). If ocfs2_journal_access_di() failed, the file is added into orphan dir, and orphan dir dinode updated, but file dinode has not been updated. Accordingly, the data is not consistent between file dinode and orphan dir. So, need to call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before

Hi Manman, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. > This is based on discussions with Adrian, David and Eric. > Thanks for bringing this back to the list. The original thread was getting quite long. > --------------------------- > Problem:

On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:27 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > +1 to roughly everything Eric said. > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. >> This is based on discussions with Adrian, David and Eric. >> >>

+1 to roughly everything Eric said. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. > This is based on discussions with Adrian, David and Eric. > > --------------------------- > Problem: > A single class can be used in multiple source files and the

In ocfs2_add_branch, we use the rightmost rec of the leaf extent block to generate the e_cpos for the new added branch. In the most case, it is OK but if there is a gap between the the root(or branch) 's rightmost rec and the leaf, it will cause kernel panic if we insert some clusters in it. The message is something like: (7445,1):ocfs2_insert_at_leaf:3775 ERROR: bug expression:

On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> Hi Manman, >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. >>> This

On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:52 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> Hi Manman, >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren

On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:18 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:52 PM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM,

On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > Hi Manman, > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. >> This is based on discussions with Adrian, David and Eric. >> > > Thanks for bringing this back to the

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at

On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:39 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:18 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:52 PM, David Blaikie

On Jun 21, 2013, at 1:12 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35

On Jun 21, 2013 1:19 AM, "Jeremy Lakeman" <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Wouldn't it be simpler to name the metadata based on the hash of the content? Then you could use a normal reference to that metadata without needing to create a new type or teach the rest of llvm how to use it... Sounds reasonable (probably with some nice prefix to get these things a

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Hi Manman, > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > > The intent of this proposal is to speedup