similar to: [PATCH 0/5] OCFS2 quota fixes

Hello, the following patch series implements quotas for OCFS2. The patch series is based on: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfasheh/ocfs2.git linux-next I've adressed Joel's comments, also node recovery is now fully working and I've fixed a few issues I found during my testing. So I'm currently not aware of any bugs. Please review, test, comment. Thanks.

Hi, This is the second batch of Ocfs2 patches intended for the merge window. The 1st batch were sent out previously: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/19/280 The bulk of this set is comprised of Jan Kara's patches to add quota support to Ocfs2. Many of the quota patches are to generic code, which I carried to make merging of the Ocfs2 support easier. All of the non-ocfs2 patches should have

Hi, the first four patches in this series fix locking problems in OCFS2 quota code (three of them can lead to potential deadlocks). The fifth patch reorders ip_alloc_sem for directories to be acquired before localalloc locks. Mark would you please merge these? The last two patches implement lockdep annotations for OCFS2 cluster locks. We annotate all the cluster locks except for special ones

Hi, I'm resending this patch series. It's rediffed against linux-next branch of Joel's git tree. The first four patches are obvious fixes of deadlocks in quota code and should go in as soon as possible. The other three patches implement lockdep support for OCFS2 cluster locks. So you can have a look whether the code make sence to you and possibly merge them. They should be NOP when

hello! i'm using redhat 7.2 with ext3 as my primary fs on kernel 2.4.17 + grsecurity + acl after 2-3 days of uptime i'm expiriencing problems... i attached below excert from my system logs. machine stops responing for a few seconds and after then it looks, like it's in normal operation again. the only problem is load, which is incrementing constantly, but cpu is 99% idle... after

Hi, I have a server configured as follows: a standard 2.4.18 kernel, IDE discs, 1Gb RAM (not all used), load avg around 1-2. a large partition, formatted reiserfs within large partition are 80 300Mb loopback file systems, formatted ext3. I got the following assertion yesterday which forced a lot of processes into D state. I'm not sure how easy it is to reproduce this problem.

Hi, below comes a new version of the series of patches implementing quota support for ocfs2-tools. I've fixed the calls of ocfs2_malloc_blocks() which were given number of bytes instead of number of blocks. Besides that the series should be the same. Honza

Hi, this is the next version of quota support for quota tools. I've addressed all the comments of Tao, Joel and others. Sparse feature disabling also correctly updates quota information now and the patch is merged into the tunefs support patch. Honza

I''d like to start gathering information/debating on the advantages/disadvantages of using it "should ..." vs other techniques. Dan North explained why we should use should: http://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd/ I used to use it "should ..." for the projects I was on, until I was challenged by a fellow developer who started using it with an active voice. For example

hi Jan, I've attached Yu-Chan's quota.h -- does this look familiar to you? It is clearly not the quota.h from the XFS CVS as I had originally thought. It may be the one from the XFS 1.1 CDs, which is a Redhat-based, XFS-enabled distro, so would have an earlier version of your VFS quota patches (via -ac kernel). Either way, it doesn't really matter. We need to fix Samba, and a

Hi, I'm sending a series of patches implementing quota support into ocfs2-tools. It's the same as the original huge patch I've sent but now it's split as Joel asked. I've also realized that when disabling SPARSE feature, we should update quota information. That piece of code is missing, I'll implement it soon. Comments welcome. Honza

Hi, I have problem with quota storage information in dovecot-2.2.29 (and newer versions, too - 2.2.30.2). I use FS quota backend. ............................ # 2.2.29.1 (e0b76e3): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 4.4.68-1 x86_64 mail_plugins = quota plugin { quota = fs:User quota:mount=/poczta:user quota2 = fs:Group quota:mount=/poczta:group } protocol imap {

kfree() handles NULL pointers fine - checking is redundant. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml at dif.dk> --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-orig/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-02 08:37:55.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-25 22:41:41.000000000 +0100 @@ -197,8 +197,7 @@ ext3_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty acl = NULL; else acl = ERR_PTR(retval); - if (value) -

W dniu 20.06.2017 o 21:25, Timo Sirainen pisze: > On 20 Jun 2017, at 15.49, Macka <dovecot at macka.pl> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have problem with quota storage information in dovecot-2.2.29 (and >> newer versions, too - 2.2.30.2). >> I use FS quota backend. > . >> After upgrade from 2.2.27 to 2.2.29 (newest 2.2.30.2 too), dovecot >> returns

Now in ocfs2_local_free_info(), it returns 0 even if it actually fails. Though it doesn't cause any real problem since the only caller dquot_disable() ignores the return value, we'd better return correct as it is. Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com> --- fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git

hello! i'm using redhat 7.2 with ext3 as my primary fs on kernel 2.4.17 + grsecurity + acl after 2-3 days of uptime i'm expiriencing problems... i attached below excert from my system logs. machine stops responing for a few seconds and after then it looks, like it's in normal operation again. the only problem is load, which is incrementing constantly, but cpu is 99% idle...

Hi, I have a working Installation with: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Dovecot 2.2.22 MySql 5.7.24 Postfixadmin 3.2 Apache 2.4.18 Rainloop 1.12.1 I manage the E-Mail Accounts with postfixadmin in a MySql-DB. Also I use quotas with Quota Backend postfixadmin-DB (dict). Everything works fine. Now I installed a new Server with the following Versions and migrate the Configs to the new System. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

Thanks for your answer, Timo! :) I send to you my configoration for reproducing. Please, follow the link, because configuration is a very big, there will be more easy to read and understand My configuration Dovecot 2.2.19 <http://www.heypasteit.com/clip/28CW> Below the same my configuration Dovecot 2.2.19 here. BEGIN of configuration --------------------- # doveconf -n # 2.2.19:

With quota count and quota_clone it works, but can I use noenforcing with quota count? quota = count:User quota:noenforcing When I test this config, I receive no quota-warning E-Mail: service quota-warning { executable = script /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh # user = dovecot user = vmail unix_listener quota-warning { user = vmail group = vmail mode = 0660 } } plugin {

Hello, I'm in the process of moving users from an old dovecot setup with system users to a modern virtual user setup. I can't find good documentation on domain quota. It is mentioned in the docs as quota2 = dict:domain:%d:proxy::quota_domain but not much more. Searching the mailing list or Google doesn't reveal much more info. Searching the German mailing list at jpberlin finds