similar to: quota for ocfs2 do not warn a exceed for block soft-limit sometimes

greetings. centos 6.7 [current] 'disk utility' has started showing message; WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. for sdc5 - /home partition. /dev/sdc5 302243312 156348604 130534968 55% /home /dev/sdc7 80854912 57088 76683952 1% /hdd/c/07 other than time involved to backup

On 04/22/16 08:19, Leon Fauster wrote: <<>> > check it with: > > blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sd > > (if a '0' is returned, the partition is aligned) > ===> Leon, thank you for reply. ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc5 2560 ]$ sudo blockdev --report /dev/sdc1 RO

Back story: I started my pool with a 200gb partition at the end of my drive (sdc5) , until I was able to clear out the data at the beginning of my drive. When I was ready, I ran `btrfs dev add /dev/sdc4 /` then `btrfs dev del /dev/sdc5 /`, $ sudo btrfs fi resize max / Resize ''/'' of ''max'' ERROR: unable to resize ''/'' - Invalid argument in

I shot myself in the foot today. I had a centos 5.11 install running fine. Doing a backup, I overwrote the /bin directory by mistake. I couldn't get my machine to recognize a centos 6.5 or 6.6 install dvd, so I put in the original centos 5.10 install disc and re-installed. No problem. During the text installer, I told it to install grub on /dev/sdc1, which is /boot. My raid arrays with lots

Hi. I have a volume group (let's say) vg_data. It consists from /dev/sdd5 sdd6 sdd7 I added sdc5 Now I want to remove (free) sdd7 and you is to for RAID partition. What are the commands (ordered) I need to perform? I failed to find clear howto. vg-data has only one partition, total size is over 1TB, free space is about 500GB so

Hello I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Here is an example: GlusterFUSE mount: # cd /mnt/glusterfs # rm -f testfile1 ; dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile1 bs=1G count=1 1+0 records

I realize batch mode is still experimental, but I was hoping there might be a workaround for a problem I am getting. I have been trying to run some tests and I get the below error when I use the --read-batch option to. I can successfully create an initial set of batch files, then a second set based upon a few modified test files from the first batch. When I first run the --read-batch option

Am 22.04.2016 um 12:40 schrieb g <geleem at bellsouth.net>: > greetings. > > centos 6.7 [current] > > > 'disk utility' has started showing message; > > WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may > result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. > > for sdc5 - /home partition. > > /dev/sdc5 302243312

Hi Xavi At this time I'm using 'plain' bricks with XFS. I'll be moving to LVM cached bricks. There is no RAID for data bricks, but I'll be using hardware RAID10 for SSD cache disks (I can use 'writeback' cache in this case). 'small file performance' is the main reason I'm looking at different options, i.e. using formated sparse files. I spent considerable

I have a simple program that read all HTML files from a directory and returns parts of the content and the file names which are HREFs to those file. I build the HREF string dynamicaly as PATH_TO_DOC_ROOT + "file_name". My PATH_TO_DOC_ROOT = http://127.0.0.1:3000/docman/public/docs. So, the final link that I am interested in might look like this:

Hi. Which is the preferable method for booting multiple logical partions via syslinux ? 1. Create seperate logical (fat 32) partitons for 'each' Live CD, extracted and prepared identically via syslinux/syslinux.cfg (sdc5, sdc6,sdc7 etc.) 2. Use Grub2 to attempt to boot seperate logical partitions with the same extracted Live CD plan as above. 3. Use the chain.c32 module that

Hi I have a degraded array /dev/md2 ===================================================================== $ mdadm -D /dev/md2 /dev/md2: Version : 00.90.01 Creation Time : Thu Oct 6 20:31:57 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 221953536 (211.67 GiB 227.28 GB) Device Size : 110976768 (105.84 GiB 113.64 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 2

Hi Dmitri, On 22/09/17 17:07, Dmitri Chebotarov wrote: > > Hello > > I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount > and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). > > The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). > > I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Could you explain what hardware

Hi, I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy files from a macOS 10.12.2 system to an AFP mounted share. The command I'm using is: rsync -avAX -M--fake-super ./testDir ./mnt/testDir/ This works fine and all the extended attributes are copied and readable. I then try to use rsync to copy these files back with: rsync -avAX --fake-super -M--super ./mnt/testDir/ ./testDir2/ This

On 04/22/2016 09:43 AM, g wrote: > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 > 0 > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 > 0 > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc5 > 2560 > ]$ sudo blockdev --report /dev/sdc1 > RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device > rw 256 512 4096 2048 838860800 /dev/sdc1 > ]$ sudo blockdev --report

I have a system running CentOS 6.3, with a SCSI attached RAID: http://www.raidweb.com/index.php/2012-10-24-12-40-09/janus-ii-scsi/2012-10-24-12-40-59.html For disaster recovery purposes, I want to build up a spare system which could take the place of the server hosting the RAID above. But here's what I see: # fdisk -l /dev/sdc WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on

I''m getting a VFS kernel panic when trying to booting to FC3 from Xen. Its the one that says I must supply a valid "root=" option. (sorry I don''t have it verbatim.) I''m using the xen-2.0 binary installer, kernel 2.6.9. I am using ext3fs, but I am fairly certain that I have compiled support into the kernel. (I''ve tired compile xen from the 2.0

Have you done any testing with replica 2/3? IIRC my replica 2/3 tests out performed EC on smallfile workloads, it may be worth looking into if you can't get EC up to where you need it to be. -b ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dmitri Chebotarov" <4dimach at gmail.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <Gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday,

I''m seeing some pretty pitiful performance using ZFS on a NFS server, with a ZFS volume exported (only with rw=host.foo.com,root=host.foo.com opts) and mounted on a Linux host running kernel 2.4.31. This linux kernel I''m working with is limited in that I can only do NFSv2 mounts... irregardless of that aspect, I''m sure something''s amiss. I mounted the zfs-based

Hi all, we got a new test system here and I just also tested btrfs raid6 on that. Write performance is slightly lower than hw-raid (LSI megasas) and md-raid6, but it probably would be much better than any of these two, if it wouldn''t read all the during the writes. Is this a known issue? This is with linux-3.9.2. Thanks, Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line