similar to: Memory leak in ocfs2/dlm?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Memory leak in ocfs2/dlm?"

2007 Feb 15
2
Re: [Linux-HA] OCFS2 - Memory hog?
Yes, the clients are doing lots of creates. But my question is, if this is a memory leak, why does ocfs2 eat up the memory as soon as the clients start accessing the filesystem. Within about 5-10 minutes all physical RAM is consumed but then the memory consumption stops. It does not go into swap. Do you happen to know what version of ocfs2 has the fix? If it was a leak would the process not be
2009 Apr 22
1
[PATCH 1/1] OCFS2: fasten dlm_lock_resource hash_table lookups
#backporting the 3 patches at http://kernel.us.oracle.com/~smushran/srini/ to 1.2. enlarge hash_table capacity to fasten hash_table lookups. Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff -up ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c.orig ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c --- ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c.orig 2009-04-22 11:00:37.000000000 +0800 +++
2009 Feb 03
10
Convert mle list to a hash
These patches convert the mle list to a hash. The same patches apply on ocfs2 1.4 too. Currently, we use the same number of hash pages for mles and lockres'. This will be addressed in a future patch that will make both of them configurable. Sunil
2009 Feb 26
13
o2dlm mle hash patches - round 2
The changes from the last drop are: 1. Patch 11 removes struct dlm_lock_name. 2. Patch 12 is an unrelated bugfix. Actually is related to a bugfix that we are retracting in mainline currently. The patch may need more testing. While I did hit the condition in my testing, Marcos hasn't. I am sending it because it can be queued for 2.6.30. Give us more time to test. 3. Patch 13 will be useful
2016 Feb 12
2
Segmentation fault on doveadm search -A with a huge user base
Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 with a director/backend setup. The user base is about 4711 users currently. If I start at one of the directors doveadm search -A all savedbefore 5000d it terminates with doveadm(1rrissma): Error: doveadm server disconnected before handshake: EOF doveadm(1rrissma): Error: 2001:638:913:f33::5:ff:24245: Command search failed for 1phaaman: EOF
2013 May 17
1
Pigeonhole: extprograms - pipe
Hello! I've tried to use extprograms pipe feature but stuck with "Broken pipe" errors in mail log: May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: lmtp(20338, user at domain.tld): Debug: 3VMVFWFKllFyTwAArRg8UA: sieve: action pipe: running program: learn May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: script: Error: write(response) failed: Broken pipe May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: lmtp(20338, user at
2016 Apr 27
3
Crash: setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
Hi, Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command, the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation: ? login ? C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1
2019 Jun 13
2
memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl
Hello Dmitry On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:12:06 +0800 Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:07 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton at sina.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Jason > > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:10:39 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > This is basically a kfree(ubuf) after the second vhost_net_flush() in > > > vhost_net_release(). >
2019 Jun 13
2
memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl
Hello Dmitry On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:12:06 +0800 Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:07 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton at sina.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Jason > > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:10:39 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > This is basically a kfree(ubuf) after the second vhost_net_flush() in > > > vhost_net_release(). >
2019 Jun 14
2
memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl
Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:26:02 +0800 syzbot wrote: > > Hello, > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: > memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl > Oh sorry for my poor patch. > ANGE): hsr_slave_1: link becomes ready > 2019/06/13 18:24:57 executed programs: 18 > BUG: memory leak > unreferenced object 0xffff88811cbc6ac0
2019 Jun 14
2
memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl
Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:26:02 +0800 syzbot wrote: > > Hello, > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: > memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl > Oh sorry for my poor patch. > ANGE): hsr_slave_1: link becomes ready > 2019/06/13 18:24:57 executed programs: 18 > BUG: memory leak > unreferenced object 0xffff88811cbc6ac0
2013 May 17
0
(no subject)
Hello! I've tried to use extprograms pipe feature but stuck with "Broken pipe" errors in mail log: May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: lmtp(20338, user at domain.tld): Debug: 3VMVFWFKllFyTwAArRg8UA: sieve: action pipe: running program: learn May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: script: Error: write(response) failed: Broken pipe May 17 15:18:57 backend1 dovecot: lmtp(20338, user at
2016 Feb 11
3
LMTP proxy does not pass RCPT TO: ... 5xx response back
Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup. On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of the backends. The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at RCPT TO time. Here is what I typed, connected to the director Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded! 220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot
2016 May 30
3
doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi, I'm doing quota checks from a remote machine (the real setup is a bit more complex, if necessary I can explain it in more detail, but I just extracted the bits that are easily reproduceable) # nc backend1 24245 VERSION doveadm-server 1 0 PLAIN agrVMDvHgz0ya2HHzax5svwB2ZHS? + heiko quota get But since the backend is upgraded to 2.2.22 it's not
2009 May 01
0
[PATCH 1/3] OCFS2: speed up dlm_lockr_resouce hash_table lookups
use multiple pages for the hash table. mainline git commit: 03d864c02c3ea803b1718940ac6953a257182d7a Authored-by: Daniel Phillips <phillips at google.com> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- Index: ocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c =================================================================== --- ocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c (revision 1) +++
2010 May 27
10
Is there something missing for my NIC passthough?
Hi experts I use xen-4.0.0 and dom0 is 2.6.33 and domU is 2.6.34 #lspci ............... 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06) 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit
2018 Sep 17
2
Using both starttls and ssl in passdb on proxy results in timeouts
Hi List, I have a dovecot which proxies to different backends depending on an entry in a mysql-database. The mysql-query sets ?ssl? to ?any-cert? and this works fine. But this causes me a problem: sieve-backends only support STARTTLS and if I set ?ssl? to ?any-cert? (or yes), it will attempt a TLS-connection to the sieve-backends, which fails. My attempt was to alter the query to include
2009 Apr 17
26
OCFS2 1.4: Patches backported from mainline
Please review the list of patches being applied to the ocfs2 1.4 tree. All patches list the mainline commit hash. Thanks Sunil
2016 Apr 27
2
Crash: setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
On 27.04.2016 11:00, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Hi, > >> ? login ? >> C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) >> >> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured >> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap(heiko):
2015 Oct 11
2
dovecot as proxy and verification of the backends certificate
Hello, I'm using a dovecot as proxy, connecting to one or more backends. The backends use X.509 certificates. The proxy's passdb returns extra fields: user=foo proxy host=backend1.<domain> ssl=yes nopassword=y Thus the proxy connects to the backend but can't verify the backends certificate. The following comment suggests using ssl_client_ca_file for