similar to: How to run korn shell script?

<input type="text" name="date1" id="dateField1" onchange="magicDate(''dateField1'');" onfocus="if (this.className != ''error'') this.select()" /> How could I generate above text filed using ruby? I am not sure how to give the options such as onchange, onfocus, id and so on? could some one please help. --

On 4/24/2015 10:47 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >> if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it >> currently is in. > > I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with > /bin/sh. I interpret your statement to mean that if a user is using ksh > and enters the path to such a script,

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:15:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: >> >> > Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of >> > ksh88 licensing problems. Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting >> > course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn

On 04/27/16 14:19, John R Pierce wrote: > >>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> > >>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >>> > >>> > >> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:54:48AM -0400, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > Even though Solaris started using ksh as the default user environment, > almost all of the start scrips were either bourne or bash scripts. With > Bash having more functionality the scripts typically used the > environment that suited the requirements best. Bash is a better command shell for many people, but ksh

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:15:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > > > Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of ksh88 > > licensing problems. Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting > > course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn himsef!) told me I couldn't > > give

I am trying to get this enginer to work....and I am not sure how to install the engine? could someone please give me some instructions with regards to this.... http://rails-engines.org/wiki/pages/DateboxEngine for example in the website above The Engines plugin or the EdgeEngines plugin * Engines 1.0 script/plugin install http://opensvn.csie.org/rails_engines/branches/engines/ *

Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of ksh88 > licensing problems. Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting > course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn himsef!) told me I couldn't > give people copies of the shell to take home. AFAIR, ksh was OSS (but not using an OSI approved license)

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:27:26PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> Some of the BSDs use to have a bourne shell and maybe some do, I don't know. >> > Yup. > >> bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts) which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other *nix systems. > > Bash can run

On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,

>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >> > >> > > Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for > OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell

On 04/27/16 15:16, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: >> On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>>> one of the reasons being it

>>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >>> > >>> > >> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for >> OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell > > indeed, the man for sh(1) on freebsd 10.3 says (in part) > > HISTORY > A sh command, the Thompson

On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>> >>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:55:40 -0700 (PDT) > From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> > Subject: Re: Root users shell == no existant shell /bin/bash > To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20040709165540.2799D2C1CC@mx5.roble.com> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > "Peter C. Lai" wrote: > > as a rule of thumb,

In R, how do I execute a script that sets environment variables within the same shell session? Hi all, Could you please shed some lights on how to do this? In a shell, I launched the R session. But then in R, I realized that some environment variables need to be set up. Of course I can use "Sys.setenv()"... But I have so many of them... And for some special reason, I have to first

I'm creating a project that lets users upload images onto products and then buy the products. I'm using Carrierwave and Minimagick. I found this cylnderize script on fmwconcepts. It's a shell script. It is literally perfect for what I need as a lot of the products are mugs. Does anyone know how I might be able to convert the script into minimagick code I can use in my controller? --

Either I am missing something or I am really STUPID. 1. I have added a user, named nutmon, to the nut group. 2. In upsmon.conf I have set RUN_AS_USER nutmon . 3. I have NOTIFYCMD /etc/nut/notifyme.sh and it is set as 755, so should be executable by everyone. 4. I have the NOTIFYFLAG set as SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC, so the shell should execute. This is the shell script : #!/bin/bash # # NUT NOTIFYCMD

Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, it would be nice to run xend under the supervision of runit. xenconsoled and xenstored already provide relevant switches (-i and --no-fork). Thanks Andras -- Andras Korn <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu> <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/> QOTD: Paranoid: someone

On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or