similar to: regarding the extending OCFS partiton

I've tried several times to resize one of my ocfs volumes[see emcpowere1 below] I'm on the latest [prod] version of ocfs/ocfs-tools as of 3pm EST on 18JUL04. Per instructions... Take down db, unmount all ocfs drives, use ' tuneocfs -F -S 100G /dev/emcpowere1 ' Supposedly this should work, but I get get.... The size specified, 100G, is larger than the device size, 59G. Aborting.

In installing 10g\RAC we hit an issue that has been indentified as a bug with CRS where the cluster locking files cannot be implemented under OCFS. Supposedly they work fine when implemented as Raw Devices. We needed to reclaim some space from existing LUN's to create the raw devices as we had expected to able to put all Oracle related files under OCFS (Yes, we belived the hype). This

We want to expand the LUN's on our SAN. I have expanded the LUN's, rebooted the hosts, now want the hosts to mount up the larger LUN, but they still see the original size. How risky is it to use tuneocfs to grow the filesystem after the expanded LUN is presented to the host? I was unable to find anything outside the man page for it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

Specs: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 Shared Storage: Dell/EMC CX600 naviagentcli-6.19.0.4.14-1.noarch.rpm PowerPath 4.4 My system was originally installed by Dell. Since then I've upgraded the OCFS and a few other pkgs. But ever since the beginning the ocfs drives mounted on boot.

Hello, RHAS 2.1 ocfs -1.0.12.1 We have to exchange our current disksystem (from /dev/sdbX to /dev/emcpowera). Planned is to create partitons with the same name like on the old device and then simply copy the files to the new device. Question is now whether there is any impact (similar to change of NIC) on configuration,etc? As far as i know ocfs saves device-informations only in the volume

# uname -r 2.4.21-20.ELsmp [root@hp2620-2 root]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.13-1 [root@hp2620-2 root]# /sbin/load_ocfs /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=hp2620-2-eth1 ip_address=10.1.2.101 cs=1913 guid=8D65C7CEECF9EBE638BD0013215BD6E9 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000 insmod: ocfs: no module by that name found load_ocfs: insmod failed [root@hp2620-2 root]#

Hi all, I trying install OCFS in Red Hat AS 2.1, with Kernel 2.4.9-e.27, updated by RedHat-Network Service. When i compile the source code for version ocfs-1.0.9 , ( configure, make and make install) , and then i execute "depmod -a", i have the next output: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-e.27/kernel/drivers/addon/ocfs/ocfs.o If i try insert module with

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

When OCFS2 is available as Production? == Nguyen Quang Huy Sr. Technical Sales Consultant Oracle Vietnam 53 Quang Trung St, Hanoi Email: quang.huy.nguyen@oracle.com Phone: +84 4 943 2595 Fax: +84 4 943 2592 == -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com]On Behalf Of ocfs-users-request@oss.oracle.com Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

I am doing an install of ocfs 1.0.12 on rh 3.0 and rpm install complains [root@xxx ocfs-1.0.12]# rpm -Uvh * error: Failed dependencies: ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-hugemem-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 where can i find ocfs-support rpm?

Hi All, I am getting this error after updating RHEL 3 Update 5 to update 8.. After upgrading OCFS loading get failed boot.log entries Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: modprobe: Can't locate module ocfs Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: load_ocfs: insmod failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA ocfs:  failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA mount: mount: fs type ocfs not supported by kernel I had given depmod

>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Hi, I am trying to install Oracle 9i RAC on SLES 8 SP3 with a shared firewire disk. I am using the following OCFS: OCFS Release 1.0.11-1 for suse sp3 2.4.21-138 smp kernel ocfs-2.4.21-138-smp-1.0.11-1.i586.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm 1/ I have configured OCFS and a shared file system /opt/oracle/oradata 2/ I have created a raw device for use as quorum

Greetings, I installed RedHat Linux AS version 3/Update 3 over the weekend, along with ocfs RPMs that are listed below: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.13-1.i686.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm Oracle 10g was then installed on the systems. On both the test cluster that I used and the production cluster that I installed over the weekend are some pretty strange lines

From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains

Hello, I want to use ocfs for a 10g RAC installation on a 2 node cluster, consisting of 1 Athlon and 1 Pentium machine with Firewire storage. OS is RHAS 3. Since I need to build my own binary Athlon rpm's, I downloaded ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz I was able to install both (./configure ; make - make install). When I try to load_ocfs I get lots of errors

Hi, using ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.12-1 on Redhat 3 U4 Trying to copy files from an ocfs volume to an ext3 volume is very very slow - talking a couple of minutes for a 100Mb file. same happens if I use o-direct or not, dd exhibits the same behaviour ocfs is in the updatedb.conf and both filesystems are in the PRUNEPATHS line in the same file (a reboot was done after the changes were made just to

Running database in ASYNC mode in RHEL 3 has a potential risk of redo logs failure due to some short io's. A note from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/RedHat/RHEL3/i386/README.txt says that the above mentioned problem is fixed in OCFS 1.0.9-12 "RELEASE 1.0.9-12 Fixes a potential corruption with large, aligned, direct I/Os, for example Oracle redo logs or direct path SQL