similar to: Availability of OCFS 1.0.14 for RHAS 2.1 Itanium64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Availability of OCFS 1.0.14 for RHAS 2.1 Itanium64"

2004 Feb 06
0
ENC: RES: ocfs installation error on RHAS 2.1
Well, I've downloaded the kernel source code from http://mirror.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os /SRPMS/kernel-2.4.18-e.40.src.rpm and compiled it for x86 (i686). Is this kernel compatible with ocfs ?? __________________________________________ Mauro Staretz - MI Montreal Inform?tica Ltda Microsoft MCSE+I / MCDBA / MCP - Oracle OCP Tel: 55-21-2291-6116 R.2104
2004 Feb 06
1
ocfs installation error on RHAS 2.1
I'm trying to install ocfs on a Redhat 2.1 AS, uniprocessor, kernel 2.4.18-e.40, and I'm receiving the following error message when I try to install ocfs-support-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm: Checking fir Red Hat enterprise kernel: [FAILED] error: execution of %post scriptlet from ocfs-support-1.0.9-12, exit status 1 i've already installed those packages that are required for ocfs:
2004 Feb 09
0
RES: RES: RES: ocfs installation error on RHAS 2.1
Well, I've compiled and installed Kernel 2.4.9-37 uniprocessor. I've made ocfs setup using version 1.0.9-9 uniprocessor. I've generated ocfs.conf using ocfstool. When I start ocfs using /etc/init.d/ocfs start, I receive the following errors: [root@RAC1 root]# /etc/init.d/ocfs start Loading OCFS: /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=RAC1.localdomain ip_address=192.168.61 2 ip_port=7000
2006 Feb 07
1
REGARDING TO DOWNGRAING OCFS FROM 1.0.14-1 TO 1.0.9-12
Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm
2004 Mar 30
1
OCFS install trouble w/ new kernel - unresolved symbols
I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to
2004 Aug 07
1
Source for OCFS Support Package
Hello, I want to use ocfs for a 10g RAC installation on a 2 node cluster, consisting of 1 Athlon and 1 Pentium machine with Firewire storage. OS is RHAS 3. Since I need to build my own binary Athlon rpm's, I downloaded ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz I was able to install both (./configure ; make - make install). When I try to load_ocfs I get lots of errors
2004 Mar 30
1
RHEL 3 and OCFS 1.0.9-12 / 1.0.11-1
Is the following statement still valid for either OCFS 1.0.9-12 or OCFS 1.0.11-1? The following is from one of the questions put forward by Derek Suzuki on Ocfs-users "A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3" > Next, I saw a Metalink thread which suggests that async I/O is not > supported on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. > We've
2003 Nov 24
2
ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel
From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains
2003 Sep 23
1
OCFS for Windows?
Can I run OCFS on Windows? We have OCFS running on RHAS 2.1 and have some customers asking about clustering on windows servers instead of linux. Are there some docs I can refer to?
2004 Jun 04
1
RHE L3 -- OCFS 1.0.9-12 and 1.0.12
Running database in ASYNC mode in RHEL 3 has a potential risk of redo logs failure due to some short io's. A note from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/RedHat/RHEL3/i386/README.txt says that the above mentioned problem is fixed in OCFS 1.0.9-12 "RELEASE 1.0.9-12 Fixes a potential corruption with large, aligned, direct I/Os, for example Oracle redo logs or direct path SQL
2004 Jul 07
1
new devices for ocfs
Hello, RHAS 2.1 ocfs -1.0.12.1 We have to exchange our current disksystem (from /dev/sdbX to /dev/emcpowera). Planned is to create partitons with the same name like on the old device and then simply copy the files to the new device. Question is now whether there is any impact (similar to change of NIC) on configuration,etc? As far as i know ocfs saves device-informations only in the volume
2003 Jul 10
1
ocfs performance
Hi, I'm new to the list, so forgive me if I'm asking several naive questions that have been answered a dozen times before. I have RHAS with kernel version 2.4.9-e.10smp, running ocfs-support-1.0-2, ocfs-tools-1.0-2, ocfs-2.4.9-e.10-smp-1.0-2. I have Oracle 9iR2 RAC up and running on an IBM fiber channel architecture. I find it to be extremely slow compared to other stand alone
2003 Nov 26
1
ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not workwith RHEL 3errata kernel
>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl
2004 Nov 02
1
OCFS + RHS2.1 + RHAS3.0
Hi all Just need some ideas, is there any consideration if I collaborate OCFS + RHAS2.1 + RHAS 3.0 ( with 64bit Processor) in a RAC environment with 10 nodes. TIA Jeram
2004 Apr 22
1
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHE L3
Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we
2005 Jun 26
1
OCFS for SMP kernel (EM64T)
Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver
2004 Mar 07
1
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3
Oracle appears to have Wim chained in the basement, forced to answer mailing list questions at all hours. I do appreciate it. Our cluster has been stable since we installed RAC, but a few minor issues have me concerned. First, our storage array seems to maintain continuous low-level activity even when the database is shut down. The CPUs spend a modest amount of time in iowait state while this
2005 May 29
1
Does OCFS2 certified on RHAS3 and 2.1?
Hi All, Is there any one know if OCFS2 will be certified on RedHat AS3 or 2.1? On http://oss.oracle.com I see OCFS2 Beta is available for RHAS 4 only. Rgds, Huy. == Nguyen Quang Huy Sr. Technical Sales Consultant Oracle Vietnam 53 Quang Trung St, Hanoi Email: quang.huy.nguyen@oracle.com Phone: +84 4 943 2595 Fax: +84 4 943 2592 == -----Original Message----- From:
2004 Jun 01
5
OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15
2004 Jun 01
5
OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15