similar to: OCFS for SMP kernel (EM64T)

Hi all, This is Takahiro from Japan. I want to confirm whether dump command can be used (supported) on Linux OCFS or not. I mean, I want to know we can specify in 5th place except for '0' in /etc/fstab. [/etc/fstab] /dev/sdb1 /data ocfs _netdev 0 0 === Any information is helpful for me. Thanks, Takahiro -- --------------------------------------------------------- TAKAHIRO YOSHIMURA

Hi all, This is Takahiro from Japan. I want to confirm whether dump command can be used (supported) on Linux OCFS or not. I mean, I want to know we can specify in 5th place except for '0' in /etc/fstab. [/etc/fstab] /dev/sdb1 /data ocfs _netdev 0 0 === Any information is helpful for me. Thanks, Takahiro -- --------------------------------------------------------- TAKAHIRO YOSHIMURA

Hi all, This is Takahiro from Japan. I want to confirm whether dump command can be used (supported) on Linux OCFS or not. I mean, I want to know we can specify in 5th place except for '0' in /etc/fstab. [/etc/fstab] /dev/sdb1 /data ocfs _netdev 0 0 === Any information is helpful for me. Thanks, Takahiro -- --------------------------------------------------------- TAKAHIRO YOSHIMURA

Hi experts, My customer issued debugocfs to check for file_size and extent info but values such as file_size, alloc_size, next_free_ext were 0. (/dev/sdi1 contains datafiles and arc files) # debugocfs -a 0 /dev/sdi1 debugocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri Mar 5 14:35:29 PST 2004 (build fcb0206676afe0fcac47a99c90de0e7b) file_extent_0: file_number = 128 disk_offset = 1433600 curr_master = 0 file_lock =

Hi All, Can I have the release plan of OCFS R1.0.15? Our big Customer, *** BANK, has hit BUG:4590449 (fixed in R1.0.15) and we need to show our ETA of R1.0.15 now. # Customer's system is running on RH 2.1 x86. Since OCFS R2.0 has already been released, I'm afraid that R1.0.15 will be released or not. (R1.0.14 is terminal release?) Any information will be helpful for us. Regards,

Hi All, Can I have the release plan of OCFS R1.0.15? Our big Customer, *** BANK, has hit BUG:4590449 (fixed in R1.0.15) and we need to show our ETA of R1.0.15 now. # Customer's system is running on RH 2.1 x86. Since OCFS R2.0 has already been released, I'm afraid that R1.0.15 will be released or not. (R1.0.14 is terminal release?) Any information will be helpful for us. Regards,

Hi, Please advice how to download utility for 'tar', 'cp' supporting RHAS3.0 RPMs listed in note 237997.1 are used for RHAS2.1 * Patch 2883583: fileutils-4.1-4.2.i386.rpm * Patch 2913284: tar-1.13.25-9.i386.rpm Best regards, Huy. == Nguyen Quang Huy Sr. Technical Sales Consultant Oracle Vietnam 53 Quang Trung St, Hanoi Email: quang.huy.nguyen@oracle.com Phone: +84 4 943 2595

Hi Guys Im trying to complile Asterisk on my new dual Xeon 3.0ghz EM64T machine. Im running Debian 3.1, and have installed the 2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp kernel (and headers). The system is working fine and is detecting both CPU's (4 actually, with hyperthreading). But when I try to compile Zaptel, Im getting this error: /lib/modules/2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp? /build make -C

I'm looking to install Asterisk on an EM64T Dell 1850. PERC raid 1, 1GB ram, single 3Ghz Xeon. Any red flags or anything I should know? Should I bother installing a 64 bit OS? (gentoo-amd64)? Does asterisk work in 64 bit mode? Should I turn hyper threading off? Etc?

Hello! I have been successful using SYSLINUX and Etherboot to create a generic "PXE-on-a-disk" package, a floppy image and CD image that support as many Ethernet cards as possible. These have support for all of Etherboot's modules that support real PCI cards: about 25-or-so drivers and 250-or-so cards. I've built Etherboot ZLILO images, one for each driver, set up to boot

Hello, Will "R" work on this 64 bit machine?, Here are the specs. of our linux box: *Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS (v.3 Standard for AMD64 and Intel EM64T) *OS: redhat-release Release: 3WS CPU Arch: ia32e-redhat-linux (4) GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz 3399 MHZ Arch: EM64T Cache: 1024 KB Vendor: GenuineIntel Memory: 2000 MB Stepping: 1 Family: 15 Swap: 4000

Hello, Will switchning to 64bit distribution (intel EM64T) provide any performance gain to the networking code: routing (lots of rules and big routing tables), scheduling (htb) and iptables? Thank you. -- Anton Glinkov network administrator

Dear mailing-list members, In the days of cheap RAM and microarray applications feasting on memory, 64-bit computers become more and more useful - to actually make use of memory beyond the magic 4GB border. I would like to report the success of running 64-bit R on an Intel Xeon EM64T machine under Linux. Just like on an AMD Opteron, R v2.0.0 compiles fine (and out of the box) and is happily

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Hi, A new version (2.0.8-2.centos) for yum has been pushed to the mirrors for testing before going into the main tree. This release only includes a small fix for EM64T machines running the x86_64 version of CentOS 3: the ia32e architecture is now recognized for yum as an compatible architecture name. The only CentOS ia32e.rpm are the kernel and kernel-unsupported rpms. No one has reported the

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig

I'm trying to install ocfs on a Redhat 2.1 AS, uniprocessor, kernel 2.4.18-e.40, and I'm receiving the following error message when I try to install ocfs-support-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm: Checking fir Red Hat enterprise kernel: [FAILED] error: execution of %post scriptlet from ocfs-support-1.0.9-12, exit status 1 i've already installed those packages that are required for ocfs:

Hi all, Just a couple of quick questions. I have a HP DL360 G4 (dual 3.0Ghzprocessors). The processors are EM64T. I am using a TE411P in the system. 1. Should I run the a x86_64 Linux (CentOS) or just go with the plain old 32 bit version? 2. This being a dual processor system, should I turn on or off hyper thrreading? Thanks..... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi - Running into the error below when copying over large files via ssh. This occurs even when I have vm.overcommit_memory=2 set in /etc/sysctl.conf. The research I've done indicates that this is a bio-uses-GFP_DMA bug with EM64T. I'm running CentOS 4.4 with the 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp x86_64 kernel on the following hardware: 2 x Intel Xeon CPU 5148 @ 2.33GHz Supermicro X7DB8 motherboard