Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "segmentation fault"
2008 May 07
1
[PATCH]ocfs2-1.2: Add dput for uuid entry.
In ocfs2-1.2, when we mount a device, a debugfs dir will be created
using its uuid. When 2 devices have the same uuid, after the 1st device
is mounted, the 2nd one can't be mounted. This is OK. But the problem is
that the dentry's reference is added. So when the 1st volume is
umounted, none of these 2 volumes can be mounted then. So this fix
solves this problem by dputting the
2007 Dec 12
6
namespace problem / 1.1beta11
Hi all,
actually I got a problem with the namespaces in dovecot 1.1 beta11. It occured after purging index files and resynch via imapsync. Dovecot complains about "Unknown namespace", though it worked with versions before. I cannot comfirm for 1.1beta10, but I surely know 1.1beta9 worked with these settings.
Example:
From Folder [INBOX/Trash]
To Folder [___________]
To Folder
2012 Feb 16
1
Reading spss files into R - warnings
Hello people,
I have got a question concerning reading spss files into R:
I used the package foreign and the following command:
read.spss("C:/Eigene Dateien/myspssfile.sav",to.data.frame=T)
I have read two different files into R (several times) and always got the
following two warning messages:
first file:
Warnmeldungen:1: In `levels<-`(`*tmp*`, value = if (nl == nL)
2007 Dec 09
2
v1.1.beta11 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta11.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta11.tar.gz.sig
This one should be the last beta release before the first v1.1 release
candidate.
I'll try to stay away from this list and Dovecot in general for the next
1,5 weeks. I've several exams coming up and I should have started
studying for them days ago already.. :)
2004 Aug 18
4
LTP system call test all pass!
After fix bug 130 and 131, and some LTP bugs.
ocfs2 can now pass all LTP filesystem related system call testcases.
detail result see attach.
-------------------
Intel China Software Lab.
iNet: 8-752-1243
8621-52574545-1243(O)
xfling@users.sourceforge.net
Opinions are my own and don't represent those of my employer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2008 Oct 20
2
[PATCH] ocfs2: Fix checking of return value of new_inode()
new_inode() does not return ERR_PTR() but NULL in case of failure. Correct
checking of the return value.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
---
fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
index d5d808f..0372ef0 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
@@ -382,8 +382,8 @@ static int
2009 Feb 12
2
[PATCH 1/1] OCFS2: add IO error check in ocfs2_get_sector() -v2
checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector().
this patch is based on 1.4 git.
Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com>
--
Index: fs/ocfs2/super.c
===================================================================
--- fs/ocfs2/super.c (revision 128)
+++ fs/ocfs2/super.c (working copy)
@@ -1203,6 +1203,12 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super
unlock_buffer(*bh);
2009 Jun 19
6
Orphan scan fixes - V2
Implemented the suggestions.
Also, moved the ocfs2_orphan_scan_init() to the end of ocfs2_fill_super()
instead of calling it earlier in ocfs2_initialize_super().
Sunil
2009 Apr 08
1
ocfs2_controld.cman
If I start ocfs2_controld.cman in parallel on a few nodes, only one of them
starts up, the others exit with one of these errors:
call_section_read at 370: Reading from section "daemon_protocol" on checkpoint "ocfs2:controld" (try 1)
call_section_read at 387: Checkpoint "ocfs2:controld" does not have a section named "daemon_protocol"
call_section_read at
2010 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check
As part of adding support for OCFS2 to mount huge volumes, we need to
check that the sector_t and page cache of the system are capable of
addressing the entire volume.
An identical check already appears in ext3 and ext4. This patch moves
the addressability check into its own function in fs/libfs.c and
modifies ext3 and ext4 to invoke it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick LoPresti <lopresti at
2010 Jul 12
1
[PATCH] ocfs2: Don't duplicate page passes i_size during CoW.
During CoW, actually all the pages after i_size contains
garbage data, so don't read and duplicate them.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
index 1cf9cda..e082623 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
+++
2009 Mar 05
3
[PATCH 0/2] ocfs2: two bug fixes about xattr and inline-data V2
Hi,
Thanks Tao and Joel's review, These are the second version of the patches.
Mark and Joel, you can correct my comments if you find they don't suitable.
thanks,
tiger
2009 Jun 10
3
How to mount OCFS2 file systems using the EMC Power Path multipath device
OEL 5, OCFS 1.4, using EMC Power Path for multi pathing.
I want t mount the OCFS2 file system on the emc power path device.
I can mount by UUID, and not have to worry about persistent bindings across
nodes.
But how do I make sure when it mounts by UUID , that the pwoer path device
is used.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Thanks
--
Sridhar Avantsa
savantsa at gmail.com
-------------- next
2007 Jan 16
4
ocfs Vs ocfs2
Hi everbody this is my first post,
I have two test server .(Both of them is idle)
db1 : RHEL4 OCFS2
db2 : RHEL3 OCFS
I test the IO both of them
The result is below.
db1(Time Spend)db2(Time Spend)OS Test Command
dd (1GB) (Yazma)0m0.796s0m18.420stime dd if=/dev/zero of=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000
dd (1GB) (Okuma)0m0.241s8m16.406stime dd of=/dev/zero if=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000
cp
2007 Jan 16
4
ocfs Vs ocfs2
Hi everbody this is my first post,
I have two test server .(Both of them is idle)
db1 : RHEL4 OCFS2
db2 : RHEL3 OCFS
I test the IO both of them
The result is below.
db1(Time Spend)db2(Time Spend)OS Test Command
dd (1GB) (Yazma)0m0.796s0m18.420stime dd if=/dev/zero of=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000
dd (1GB) (Okuma)0m0.241s8m16.406stime dd of=/dev/zero if=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000
cp
2009 Feb 03
5
[PATCH 1/4] ocfs2/dlm: Retract fix for race between purge and migrate
Mainline commit d4f7e650e55af6b235871126f747da88600e8040 attempts to delay
the dlm_thread from sending the drop ref message if the lockres is being
migrated. The problem is that we make the dlm_thread wait for the migration
to complete. This causes a deadlock as dlm_thread also participates in the
lockres migration process.
A better fix for the original oss bugzilla#1012 is in testing.
2010 Nov 02
1
disabling self-fencing
Hi all,
on my nodes I have another cluster manager running that takes care of
fencing the node, is it safe to disable ocfs2 self-fencing?
Details:
I'm using ocfs2 over drbd in master/master aka primary/primary mode.
In case of loss of network connectivity I would like to disconnect the
drbd device, invalidate it and unmount the filesystem but ocfs2
reboots the node....
Is it possible to
2009 Jun 19
6
[PATCH 1/5] ocfs2: Pin journal head before accessing jh->b_committed_data
This patch adds jbd_lock_bh_state() and jbd_unlock_bh_state() around accessses
to jh->b_committed_data.
Fixes oss bugzilla#1131
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1131
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran at oracle.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
2009 Jul 21
3
[PATCH 0/2] Two b-tree bug fixes.
Hi Mark/Joel,
These are 2 bug fix for b-tree. Please review.
I have sent out the first one last week, but it was based on cacheme.
So resend it. Now it bases on joel's fixes branch.
The second one is another b-tree rotation bug. I guess the reason why
we never meet with it is that no one has ever used b-tree like reflink
before. ;)
Regards,
Tao
2009 May 03
2
[PATCH] ocfs2: Don't print error when listing too many xattrs.
Currently, when listing xattrs, kernel define XATTR_LIST_MAX as 65536
in include/linux/limits.h, so it can't handle too many xattrs.
But with ocfs2 xattr tree, we actually have no limit for the number.
And it will pollute the message with something like this when listing.
(27738,0):ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets:3158 ERROR: status = -34
(27738,0):ocfs2_xattr_tree_list_index_block:3264 ERROR: