Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Error Status = -999 messages"
2004 Mar 07
1
A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3
Oracle appears to have Wim chained in the basement, forced to answer
mailing list questions at all hours. I do appreciate it.
Our cluster has been stable since we installed RAC, but a few minor issues
have me concerned. First, our storage array seems to maintain continuous
low-level activity even when the database is shut down. The CPUs spend a
modest amount of time in iowait state while this
2005 Dec 16
3
Server crashed with Common/ocfsgencreate.c, Common/ocfsgenvote.c
Hi Experts,
We have a 4nodes RAC running and recently one is down due to hardware
(fibre optics card) failure. Since running on 3-nodes RAC, the surviving
server just keep crashing. We cannot figure out why is this happening
but checking /var/log/messages we have these error (notice the msg
before crashing at 8:32):
Dec 12 08:30:45 x335-142 kernel: (2) ERROR: file entry name did not
match inode,
2004 Mar 02
3
Odd errors while mounting an OCFS filesystem
Hello again. I am setting up a new pair of servers to run RAC.
They're connected via fibre-channel to a hardware RAID array, and both are
able to see the exposed LUNs.
When I create an OCFS filesystem on one node with mkfs.ocfs, I can
mount it. When I try to mount from the other node, however, it fails.
After that, the filesystem is left in a state where neither node can mount
it. The
2007 Jun 08
0
OCFS error
Hi,
Before I describe the problem, I'll describe my environment. This is a
development environment built over 1.5 yrs ago:
* We have a 2 node Oracle RAC Cluster.
* built on two Dell PowerEdge 1850 Servers (Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz)
* OS is RHEL3 U3
* Kernel 2.4.21-20.ELsmp
* these 2 servers are attached to an EMC AX100 SAN via fibre channel
* HBA (QLogic QLA6312 PCI to Fibre
2007 May 07
2
IMQ KERNEL PANIC 2.6.17.14 AND 2.6.21.1 No chain/target/match by that name
After starting to shape local traffic now i am getting a lot of kernel
panics in tcp_retransmit, so i decided to update my kernel from
2.6.17.14 to 2.6.21.1 , the problem is that after that i get:
# iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
so i can not redirect ttraffic to IMQ device.
and modules are loaded.
-
# lsmod
Module
2004 Sep 20
1
(28552) ERROR: err=-14, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 1887 ; error in mapping iobuf; need to fail out
we are running OCFS on 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp
ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
I have been deleting datafiles, more than 3 times successfully for rman duplication, from a mount point /data1 (total 191G).
Last week when I tried to delete datafiles from the same directory, it did delete datafiles but did not release (reclaim) all space. It still showed that 20G of
2003 Dec 11
2
Trying to install ocfs on RedHat AS 3.0
The src won't compile with gcc 2.96 or 3.23:
/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:47: warning: no
previous prototype for `gen
eric_fls'
/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:76: warning: no
previous prototype for `get
_bitmask_order'
Linux/ocfsmain.c:113: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer
type
Linux/ocfsmain.c:1492: conflicting
2014 Jan 30
0
Re: Notes on building libguestfs in a systemd-nspawn container
On 01/30/2014 03:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:50:35AM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>> - Single `make` job timing to compile everything:
>>>
>>> real 31m9.792s
>>> user 17m18.359s
>>> sys 13m17.868s
>>
>> For comparison, on the _host_, the same single `make` job timing:
>>
2005 Jan 16
2
OCFS disk failure problem.
Hi,
Irecently setup a Oracle 10g RAC test environment with two HP/Compaq
DL380s and a shared disk array. The array is presented as a single 136GB
disk.
The systems are running RedHat AS 3.0 Update 4.
OCFS 1.0.13-PROD1 build: 5e87201061935f464cf6541c56eb2827
Oracle 10g 10.1.0.3.0
I was able to get everything working, had a database created and
running an instance on each system.
The
2005 Feb 17
1
error=27072 with 1.0.14
hi,
i have a problem with ocfs. i did some tests with dbms_stats on a 2-node
RAC and got the following error:
Thu Feb 17 15:36:31 2005
KCF: write/open error block=0x7800 online=1
file=13 /db/GKEZ/tablespaces/voeb/idx01_kez.dbf
error=27072 txt: 'Linux Error: 5: Input/output error
Additional information: 30719'
Automatic datafile offline due to write error on
file 13:
2004 Nov 22
3
Mode context extremely poor performance.
Hi all,
I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context
take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran
this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The
average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes
cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it
took up to 15 sec randomly
2004 Nov 22
3
Mode context extremely poor performance.
Hi all,
I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context
take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran
this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The
average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes
cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it
took up to 15 sec randomly
2004 Oct 20
1
i-node showing 100 % used whereas the partitionsare empty
Hi Sunil,
I had filed a bug and saw your response stating that it would be fixed in version 14.
In the meanwhile , what we want to know is whether this bug is a minor bug and can be ignored for now.
Does reporting 100% inodes cause any problem for the OCFS file system or can we ignore this bug and go into production.
Also can you tell us by when version 14 would be released.
R'gds
2014 Jan 30
3
Re: Notes on building libguestfs in a systemd-nspawn container
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:50:35AM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > - Single `make` job timing to compile everything:
> >
> > real 31m9.792s
> > user 17m18.359s
> > sys 13m17.868s
>
> For comparison, on the _host_, the same single `make` job timing:
>
> real 13m41.440s
> user 13m5.816s
> sys 1m9.911s
2004 Jun 18
1
OCFS Performance vs. Raw
We are seeing some performance issues runnig on 64-bit
Linux. Running against a raw partition we can get
100MB/s write speed when creating a datafile. Using
OCFS we get 30-40MB/s and at times it is so slow it is
hard to measure.
Anyone else see these issues? We are running the
latest versions of both Oracle and OCFS. I've opened
a ticket with Oracle but am interested in other's
2004 Oct 13
1
i-node showing 100 % used whereas the partitions are empty
Output df -i
------------------
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/
/dev/sde 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa01
/dev/sdf 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa02
/dev/sdg 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa03
/dev/sdk 139410 138073 1337 100% /ocfsq01
Output df -kP
-----------------------
Filesystem
2004 Jul 16
12
OCFS Database too slow
Hi All,
we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000.
ocfs version being used is
$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
Database Version is 9.2.0.5
However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete.
We initially assumed RAC is
2020 Oct 17
0
Re: [xml] Why does libxml2 limit port numbers to 999, 999, 999?
On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:24 , Richard W.M. Jones via xml <xml@gnome.org> wrote:
> It seems like libxml2 chose to do this for convenience rather than
> correctness.
Yes, this is an arbitrary limit introduced to avoid integer overflow.
> I think it should accept port numbers at least up to
> signed int (the type used to store port numbers), and give an error if
> the port
2020 Oct 17
1
Re: [xml] Why does libxml2 limit port numbers to 999, 999, 999?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 06:32:18PM +0200, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:24 , Richard W.M. Jones via xml <xml@gnome.org> wrote:
> > It seems like libxml2 chose to do this for convenience rather than
> > correctness.
>
> Yes, this is an arbitrary limit introduced to avoid integer overflow.
>
> > I think it should accept port numbers at least
2008 Aug 26
2
lattice plotting character woes
The following reproducable code shows the setting of my problem:
set.seed(260808)
n = 50
x = rnorm(n)
y = rnorm(n)
z = ceiling(runif(n,0,4))
g = runif(n,0,6)
G = factor(ceiling(g))
xyplot(y ~ x | G)
plsy <- trellis.par.get("plot.symbol")
plsy$pch = z
trellis.par.set("plot.symbol",plsy)
xyplot(y ~ x | G)
plsy$pch = as.character(z)