Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "(28552) ERROR: err=-14, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 1887 ; error in mapping iobuf; need to fail out"
2003 Dec 11
2
Trying to install ocfs on RedHat AS 3.0
The src won't compile with gcc 2.96 or 3.23:
/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:47: warning: no
previous prototype for `gen
eric_fls'
/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/bitops.h:76: warning: no
previous prototype for `get
_bitmask_order'
Linux/ocfsmain.c:113: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer
type
Linux/ocfsmain.c:1492: conflicting
2011 Aug 30
1
setfacl <dir> : operation not supported , using glusterfs 3.2.2
Dear gluster team,
I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage.
Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux
I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with
acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount
point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says.
setfacl <dir> : operation not supported.
The logs created in server are as
2004 Mar 02
3
Odd errors while mounting an OCFS filesystem
Hello again. I am setting up a new pair of servers to run RAC.
They're connected via fibre-channel to a hardware RAID array, and both are
able to see the exposed LUNs.
When I create an OCFS filesystem on one node with mkfs.ocfs, I can
mount it. When I try to mount from the other node, however, it fails.
After that, the filesystem is left in a state where neither node can mount
it. The
2011 Dec 16
5
[Bug 8666] New: --debug=all9 fail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666
Summary: --debug=all9 fail
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au
QAContact: rsync-qa at
2004 Oct 26
1
Error Status = -999 messages
We are seeing these messages in our system log. any
idea what they might be? Unfortunately I'm not sure
what was happening at the time.
Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR:
status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1304
Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR:
status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1501
Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR:
status = -999,
2005 Feb 17
1
error=27072 with 1.0.14
hi,
i have a problem with ocfs. i did some tests with dbms_stats on a 2-node
RAC and got the following error:
Thu Feb 17 15:36:31 2005
KCF: write/open error block=0x7800 online=1
file=13 /db/GKEZ/tablespaces/voeb/idx01_kez.dbf
error=27072 txt: 'Linux Error: 5: Input/output error
Additional information: 30719'
Automatic datafile offline due to write error on
file 13:
2005 Jan 16
2
OCFS disk failure problem.
Hi,
Irecently setup a Oracle 10g RAC test environment with two HP/Compaq
DL380s and a shared disk array. The array is presented as a single 136GB
disk.
The systems are running RedHat AS 3.0 Update 4.
OCFS 1.0.13-PROD1 build: 5e87201061935f464cf6541c56eb2827
Oracle 10g 10.1.0.3.0
I was able to get everything working, had a database created and
running an instance on each system.
The
2011 Jul 11
0
Instability when using RDMA transport
I've run into a problem with Gluster stability with the RDMA transport. Below is a description of the environment, a simple script that can replicate the problem, and log files from my test system.
I can work around the problem by using the TCP transport over IPoIB but would like some input onto what may be making the RDMA transport fail in this case.
=====
Symptoms
=====
- Error from test
2011 Jun 22
1
glusterfs 3.2.1 processes in an endless loop?
Hello,
I found a new issue with glusterfs 3.2.1 - im getting a glusterfs process for each mountpoint and
they are consuming all of the CPU time.
strace won't show a thing - so no system calls are made
Mounting the same volumes on another server works fine.
Has anyone seen such a thing? Oder any idea, what causes this and how to fix it?
The logfiles don't show any information about
2009 Oct 23
1
bugs in version 3.1
I'm having two problems.
The first is that when running with --files-from and -ii unmodified
files are not put in the log. --out-format=%-14b %C %-14l %i %B %M %f
All that appears in the log is
Number of files: 0
Number of created files: 0
Number of regular files transferred: 0
Total file size: 0 bytes
Total transferred file size: 0 bytes
Literal data: 0 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list
2004 Oct 20
1
i-node showing 100 % used whereas the partitionsare empty
Hi Sunil,
I had filed a bug and saw your response stating that it would be fixed in version 14.
In the meanwhile , what we want to know is whether this bug is a minor bug and can be ignored for now.
Does reporting 100% inodes cause any problem for the OCFS file system or can we ignore this bug and go into production.
Also can you tell us by when version 14 would be released.
R'gds
2005 Dec 16
3
Server crashed with Common/ocfsgencreate.c, Common/ocfsgenvote.c
Hi Experts,
We have a 4nodes RAC running and recently one is down due to hardware
(fibre optics card) failure. Since running on 3-nodes RAC, the surviving
server just keep crashing. We cannot figure out why is this happening
but checking /var/log/messages we have these error (notice the msg
before crashing at 8:32):
Dec 12 08:30:45 x335-142 kernel: (2) ERROR: file entry name did not
match inode,
2013 Jul 31
1
pre 1 OSX errors
Hi Wayne,
Trying out 3.1 pre 1 on OSX 10.8.4
I like the new extended stats and the ir-chunk file numbers in log. Also getting a lot of errors and most copies not completing to local disk. rsync just stalls.
Standard osx build:
patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff
patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff
patch -p1 <patches/hfs-compression.diff
./configure
make
rsync --fileflags --force-change
2004 Mar 30
1
RHEL 3 and OCFS 1.0.9-12 / 1.0.11-1
Is the following statement still valid for either OCFS 1.0.9-12 or OCFS
1.0.11-1?
The following is from one of the questions put forward by Derek Suzuki on
Ocfs-users
"A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3"
> Next, I saw a Metalink thread which suggests that async I/O is not >
supported on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. >
We've
2015 Apr 08
1
syslinux.efi with QEMU/OVMF
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> As far as I can see (... well, guess), lpxelinux.0 uses the TCP
> implementation under core/lwip/, which doesn't support TCP timestamps.
>
> Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that
> one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c:
>
> if ( ( flags & TCP_SYN ) || tcp->timestamps
2004 Jun 04
1
RHE L3 -- OCFS 1.0.9-12 and 1.0.12
Running database in ASYNC mode in RHEL 3 has a potential risk of redo logs failure due to some short io's.
A note from
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/RedHat/RHEL3/i386/README.txt
says that the above mentioned problem is fixed in OCFS 1.0.9-12
"RELEASE 1.0.9-12
Fixes a potential corruption with large, aligned, direct I/Os, for
example Oracle redo logs or direct path SQL
2017 Oct 29
4
[Bug 13109] New: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Bug ID: 13109
Summary: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2011 Nov 09
0
IO error in gluterfs
Hello,
I am using
- glusterfs 3.2.2
- stripe mode
- rdma
I am trying to run one data intensive application and the application IO is
done with glusterfs. But application throws error code 30 for IO , and on
server side in /var/log/gluterfs/nfs.log the following error found:
[2011-11-09 14:59:21.251450] E [iobuf.c:526:iobuf_ref]
2011 Aug 30
2
setfacl <dir>:operation not supported
Dear gluster team,
I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage.
Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux
I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with
acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount
point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says.
setfacl <dir> : operation not supported.
The logs created in server are as
2015 Jul 11
0
EXTLINUX - GCC 5
Hi,
Gene Cumm wrote:
> > 3) It feels like this is a moving target where gcc keeps changing and
> > different results get reported.
Do we have indications that different versions of gcc5
cause different behavior on the same build and boot machines ?
Ady wrote:
> Since the issue is only present on specific
> hardware / firmware, whatever might seem to "solve" the