similar to: ocfs support rpm?

Looking for any ideas where I need to look to fix this: I'm installing RHEL3 AS (update 4) on Dell PowerEdge 6850's. I've installed the hugemem kernels on these boxes and need to install and run ocfs. Kernel: ------- 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELhugemem Loaded the ocfs rpm's --------------------- # rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.14-1 ocfs-support-1.1.5-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1

Hello, I want to use ocfs for a 10g RAC installation on a 2 node cluster, consisting of 1 Athlon and 1 Pentium machine with Firewire storage. OS is RHAS 3. Since I need to build my own binary Athlon rpm's, I downloaded ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz I was able to install both (./configure ; make - make install). When I try to load_ocfs I get lots of errors

# uname -r 2.4.21-20.ELsmp [root@hp2620-2 root]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.13-1 [root@hp2620-2 root]# /sbin/load_ocfs /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=hp2620-2-eth1 ip_address=10.1.2.101 cs=1913 guid=8D65C7CEECF9EBE638BD0013215BD6E9 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000 insmod: ocfs: no module by that name found load_ocfs: insmod failed [root@hp2620-2 root]#

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

we are running OCFS on 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 I have been deleting datafiles, more than 3 times successfully for rman duplication, from a mount point /data1 (total 191G). Last week when I tried to delete datafiles from the same directory, it did delete datafiles but did not release (reclaim) all space. It still showed that 20G of

Greetings, I installed RedHat Linux AS version 3/Update 3 over the weekend, along with ocfs RPMs that are listed below: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.13-1.i686.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm Oracle 10g was then installed on the systems. On both the test cluster that I used and the production cluster that I installed over the weekend are some pretty strange lines

Hi, I am trying to install Oracle 9i RAC on SLES 8 SP3 with a shared firewire disk. I am using the following OCFS: OCFS Release 1.0.11-1 for suse sp3 2.4.21-138 smp kernel ocfs-2.4.21-138-smp-1.0.11-1.i586.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm 1/ I have configured OCFS and a shared file system /opt/oracle/oradata 2/ I have created a raw device for use as quorum

Ivan, I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago and mailed this list. Never got a response. We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from backup. Chris Taylor Sr. Oracle DBA Unique Solutions www.unisolinc.com Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 Cell: 336-262-5545 -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com

I have noticed that OCFS is not updating the filesystem space stats when datafiles are reduced in size: is this Bug 62, and if so is there an expected fix date? ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.11-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 Linux sgl43d-122 2.4.9-e.35enterprise #1 SMP Wed Jan 7 15:11:27 EST 2004 i686 unknown bytes name 2097152000 /data/oracle/QSG40/u01/dtr_med_i_02.dbf /dev/sdc1

I have set up an ocfs system using two linux nodes connected using firewire. Details: # uname -a Linux testrac2 2.4.21-9.0.1.ELorafw1 #1 Tue Mar 2 14:42:46 PST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 1) # rpm -qa |grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.1.2-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.1.2-1 <> Oracle version: 9.2.0.5 Cluster

Specs: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 Shared Storage: Dell/EMC CX600 naviagentcli-6.19.0.4.14-1.noarch.rpm PowerPath 4.4 Post navisphere shuttingdown, The ocfs service attempts to stop Then I get errors: Ocfs:Unmounting drive on [privatenic] 7959 err: unable to sendmsg error: -101,

Thanks Sunil for your advice. I tried that both for ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz and ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz. ./configure --with kernel=/usr/src/linux-2.4.21.-9.0.01.ELorafw1 make KVER=up make install That was successful. When I tried to load_ocfs I still got "undefined symbol" errors. I found another ocfs-users thread from April where Wim suggested using the i686 kernel

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

Hi all, Sorry to break in, but I find this thread a bit interesting. Jeram: I'm not very familiar with HP storage and cannot find too much info on the EVA 6000 array. Is it related to the EVA 5000 somehow, or is it a NAS array? In any case, how is the array configured. If the algorithm for hartbeat is as described earlier (36 sector reads and one write per second (per host???)) then you

We had a situation over the weekend with our production database that we can't figure out, hoping someone can shed some light. Specifics: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 All database, redo, undo, and control files are on ocfs, archived logs are on ext3. We shut down the database for san

Specs: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 Shared Storage: Dell/EMC CX600 naviagentcli-6.19.0.4.14-1.noarch.rpm PowerPath 4.4 My system was originally installed by Dell. Since then I've upgraded the OCFS and a few other pkgs. But ever since the beginning the ocfs drives mounted on boot.

# uname -a Linux sgl122 2.4.9-e.35enterprise #1 SMP Wed Jan 7 15:11:27 EST 2004 i686 unknown # rpm -qa|grep ocfs ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 Oracle 10.1.0.3 RAC on egenera blades. "df" shows large amounts of free space (15GB, approx 50%), yet I keep getting "Linux Error: 28: No space left on device" when doing RMAN

>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15