similar to: OCFS Performance vs. Raw

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi All, we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000. ocfs version being used is $ rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 Database Version is 9.2.0.5 However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete. We initially assumed RAC is

We are seeing these messages in our system log. any idea what they might be? Unfortunately I'm not sure what was happening at the time. Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1304 Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1501 Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999,

I have noticed that OCFS is not updating the filesystem space stats when datafiles are reduced in size: is this Bug 62, and if so is there an expected fix date? ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.11-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 Linux sgl43d-122 2.4.9-e.35enterprise #1 SMP Wed Jan 7 15:11:27 EST 2004 i686 unknown bytes name 2097152000 /data/oracle/QSG40/u01/dtr_med_i_02.dbf /dev/sdc1

an ocfs-volume was nearly full (only 800MB free). i deleted some datafiles to free space: $ df -h . Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdp1 10G 5.3G 4.8G 53% /db/DPS so there are more than 4GB available. $ sqlplus /nolog SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 1 12:57:48 2004 Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights

# uname -r 2.4.21-20.ELsmp [root@hp2620-2 root]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.13-1 [root@hp2620-2 root]# /sbin/load_ocfs /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=hp2620-2-eth1 ip_address=10.1.2.101 cs=1913 guid=8D65C7CEECF9EBE638BD0013215BD6E9 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000 insmod: ocfs: no module by that name found load_ocfs: insmod failed [root@hp2620-2 root]#

Hi all, I trying install OCFS in Red Hat AS 2.1, with Kernel 2.4.9-e.27, updated by RedHat-Network Service. When i compile the source code for version ocfs-1.0.9 , ( configure, make and make install) , and then i execute "depmod -a", i have the next output: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-e.27/kernel/drivers/addon/ocfs/ocfs.o If i try insert module with

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

When OCFS2 is available as Production? == Nguyen Quang Huy Sr. Technical Sales Consultant Oracle Vietnam 53 Quang Trung St, Hanoi Email: quang.huy.nguyen@oracle.com Phone: +84 4 943 2595 Fax: +84 4 943 2592 == -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com]On Behalf Of ocfs-users-request@oss.oracle.com Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

I am doing an install of ocfs 1.0.12 on rh 3.0 and rpm install complains [root@xxx ocfs-1.0.12]# rpm -Uvh * error: Failed dependencies: ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-hugemem-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 where can i find ocfs-support rpm?

Hi All, I am getting this error after updating RHEL 3 Update 5 to update 8.. After upgrading OCFS loading get failed boot.log entries Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: modprobe: Can't locate module ocfs Nov 10 06:00:00 HHMEA load_ocfs: load_ocfs: insmod failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA ocfs:  failed Nov 10 06:00:01 HHMEA mount: mount: fs type ocfs not supported by kernel I had given depmod

>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Hi, I am trying to install Oracle 9i RAC on SLES 8 SP3 with a shared firewire disk. I am using the following OCFS: OCFS Release 1.0.11-1 for suse sp3 2.4.21-138 smp kernel ocfs-2.4.21-138-smp-1.0.11-1.i586.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm 1/ I have configured OCFS and a shared file system /opt/oracle/oradata 2/ I have created a raw device for use as quorum

Greetings, I installed RedHat Linux AS version 3/Update 3 over the weekend, along with ocfs RPMs that are listed below: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.13-1.i686.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm Oracle 10g was then installed on the systems. On both the test cluster that I used and the production cluster that I installed over the weekend are some pretty strange lines

From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains

Hello, I want to use ocfs for a 10g RAC installation on a 2 node cluster, consisting of 1 Athlon and 1 Pentium machine with Firewire storage. OS is RHAS 3. Since I need to build my own binary Athlon rpm's, I downloaded ocfs-1.0.12.tar.gz ocfs-tools-1.0.10.tar.gz I was able to install both (./configure ; make - make install). When I try to load_ocfs I get lots of errors

Hi, using ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.12-1 on Redhat 3 U4 Trying to copy files from an ocfs volume to an ext3 volume is very very slow - talking a couple of minutes for a 100Mb file. same happens if I use o-direct or not, dd exhibits the same behaviour ocfs is in the updatedb.conf and both filesystems are in the PRUNEPATHS line in the same file (a reboot was done after the changes were made just to