similar to: Lock contention issue with ocfs

having a problem with ocfs. device /dev/sdd mounted on 2 nodes, node 0 and node 1 tried to create file /u01/oracle/prod/proddata/temp01.dbf from node 1 (ALTER TABLESPACE TEMP ADD TEMPFILE...) caused oracle server process to hang in a "D" state apparently trying to create the file. the file has not been created yet. If I type "ls" from node 2 in directory /u01/oracle/prod

Hi experts, My customer issued debugocfs to check for file_size and extent info but values such as file_size, alloc_size, next_free_ext were 0. (/dev/sdi1 contains datafiles and arc files) # debugocfs -a 0 /dev/sdi1 debugocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri Mar 5 14:35:29 PST 2004 (build fcb0206676afe0fcac47a99c90de0e7b) file_extent_0: file_number = 128 disk_offset = 1433600 curr_master = 0 file_lock =

Hi all... I have a strange problem. 2 of my mount points already use 7% of space, even when I check the directory is empty. When I re-format it, it release the space for a while, after 1 or 2 days, the space is used again for 7% - 10 %. What could be the reason? I am using RHAS 2.1 Enterprise Kernel 2.1 and OCFS release 1.0.9-6 Thanks Jeram

> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:30 AM > To: airlied at linux.ie > Cc: thellstrom at vmware.com; nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org; linux- > kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; > bskeggs at redhat.com; Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian >

Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way >>>>

Am 04.08.2014 um 17:09 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 04-08-14 17:04, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 04.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 04-08-14 16:45, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>>> It'a pain to deal

an ocfs-volume was nearly full (only 800MB free). i deleted some datafiles to free space: $ df -h . Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdp1 10G 5.3G 4.8G 53% /db/DPS so there are more than 4GB available. $ sqlplus /nolog SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 1 12:57:48 2004 Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights

Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb

Is the following statement still valid for either OCFS 1.0.9-12 or OCFS 1.0.11-1? The following is from one of the questions put forward by Derek Suzuki on Ocfs-users "A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3" > Next, I saw a Metalink thread which suggests that async I/O is not > supported on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. > We've

Am 02.06.2014 12:09, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Changes since v1: > - Fixed interaction with reset handling. > + Use exclusive_lock, either with trylock or blocking. > + Bump sw irq refcount in the recovery function to prevent fiddling > with irq registers during gpu recovery. > - Add radeon lockup detection to the default fence wait function. First of all please

Hi Pavel, Right, my app also crashes in a different place under winedbg, although it crashes in the same winedbg place under gdb. I took a closer look at wine --winver nt40 --debugmsg +all. I found something interesting. If I search for queue_exception, I find that there is an exception raised before the LoadOEMCall, about 328klines in: 0806d398:Call

Greetings, Having read about the previous OSFS hangs, I think this one that we are seeing is different, but I'm not sure if this is caused by OCFS or the Linux OS. We are running OCFS Version 1.09 with Linux AS 3.0/9i RAC. We have a 2 node Intel Cluster (Node 1 and Node 2). This morning the DBA tried to do an "ls" command on /u06/oradata/database

Hi all again... I did a chroot patch with ability to change uid and gid. I dunno if you all approve with the current implementation but the patch is small and it works here. remember to CC, since i'm not on this ml... //Ian Kumlien PS. To anyone on vorbis-dev, I'm *REALLY* sorry must be tired or something.. =) DS. <p><p><p> -------------- next part -------------- A

Another question. When my database is running, I do [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ cp --o_direct xdb01.dbf /tmp cp: cannot open `xdb01.dbf' for reading: Permission denied [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ When the database is shudown it works. Is this normal for ocfs because with any other filesystem I can just copy a file at any time (Its only a testing, I know I cant copy datafiles and have

Running database in ASYNC mode in RHEL 3 has a potential risk of redo logs failure due to some short io's. A note from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/RedHat/RHEL3/i386/README.txt says that the above mentioned problem is fixed in OCFS 1.0.9-12 "RELEASE 1.0.9-12 Fixes a potential corruption with large, aligned, direct I/Os, for example Oracle redo logs or direct path SQL

Hi, I've got a program that produces these error messages when started with wine. fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! The program

Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb

Howdy, Running a FPGA design tool (Actel's Designer), I find that it works pretty good, but that certain printed status strings are being formatted incorrectly. It does not seem to affect the operation of the application, except for the status reports. For example, running wine --debugmsg +text,+string,+win /d/Actel/bin/designer and opening an existing design gives this:

Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we

Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 15-05-14 11:21, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 03:06, schrieb