similar to: 2.4.21-4.0.1 & OCFS 1.0.9-9

From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains

>also - for async io ; >p2448994_9204_LINUX.zip is the patch to apply for oracle >(this is metalink ARU patch number). Wim, The patch description on Metalink says: DIRECT IO SUPPORT ON EXT2 FILESYSTEM Which wasn't quite what I was expecting. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 25 November 2003 03:23 To: Brian M. Diehl

Hello All, I am currently running ocfs 1.0.9-9 with kernel 2.4.21-4.Elhugemem (RHEL3) and 9i RAC (9.2.0.4). Is there any big concerns I need to be aware of before upgrading to ocfs-1.0.13-1 and kernel 2.4.20-31.9? TIA, +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | Brian M. Diehl, RHCE A-1 Limousine | | Sr. Network Admin 609-919-2019 | | "In the end, things

Just out of couriosity, (I know OCFS 1 is ONLY for oracle data files) but does it support hard linking? Will OCFS 2? TIA! -- Brian M. Diehl Sr. Network Admin A-1 Limousine Inc. 609-919-2019

Hello again. Our production cluster has begun experiencing some vicious slowdowns that may (or may not) be related to the filesystems. When the problem occurs, the load average on the servers jumps up to 30 or higher. Usually one node will climb while the other drops, then they will switch places a few minutes later. At one point, we had one node's load average up over 300. Our site

I'm preparing a pair of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 servers on which to test RAC. Currently they are running the 2.4.21-4.0.2 kernel. I saw that the 1.0.9-9 OCFS binaries are tied to the 4.0.1 kernel, and confirmed that myself. The 1.0.9-12 packages are dated a few days later and don't refer to a specific kernel version, so I assumed they would work with 4.0.2. However, when I try to

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Is the following statement still valid for either OCFS 1.0.9-12 or OCFS 1.0.11-1? The following is from one of the questions put forward by Derek Suzuki on Ocfs-users "A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3" > Next, I saw a Metalink thread which suggests that async I/O is not > supported on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. > We've

I noticed under http://www.ocfs.org/ocfs <http://www.ocfs.org/ocfs> there is a 1.0.9 release. Is there a changelog file with fixes from 1.0.8? Should this version be used? Carlos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20030709/cd56f5df/attachment.htm

Running database in ASYNC mode in RHEL 3 has a potential risk of redo logs failure due to some short io's. A note from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/RedHat/RHEL3/i386/README.txt says that the above mentioned problem is fixed in OCFS 1.0.9-12 "RELEASE 1.0.9-12 Fixes a potential corruption with large, aligned, direct I/Os, for example Oracle redo logs or direct path SQL

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Hi all, Sorry to break in, but I find this thread a bit interesting. Jeram: I'm not very familiar with HP storage and cannot find too much info on the EVA 6000 array. Is it related to the EVA 5000 somehow, or is it a NAS array? In any case, how is the array configured. If the algorithm for hartbeat is as described earlier (36 sector reads and one write per second (per host???)) then you

# uname -r 2.4.21-20.ELsmp [root@hp2620-2 root]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.13-1 [root@hp2620-2 root]# /sbin/load_ocfs /sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=hp2620-2-eth1 ip_address=10.1.2.101 cs=1913 guid=8D65C7CEECF9EBE638BD0013215BD6E9 comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000 insmod: ocfs: no module by that name found load_ocfs: insmod failed [root@hp2620-2 root]#

Can I create an OCFS 2 filesystem over a ASM volume to store datafiles? Thanks! Roger---

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

Greetings, I installed RedHat Linux AS version 3/Update 3 over the weekend, along with ocfs RPMs that are listed below: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.13-1.i686.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm Oracle 10g was then installed on the systems. On both the test cluster that I used and the production cluster that I installed over the weekend are some pretty strange lines

I am trying to mount the ocfs partitions using the following command Mount -t ocfs -o uid=oracle,gid=dba /dev/sda /ocfs01 as user oracle and group dba. However it mounts the volume as root. But if I use the ocfstool for the first and mount it as oracle:dba, the subsequent mounts using the above command line mounts the volume as oracle:dba. Is there something that I am missing or I will have

I am doing an install of ocfs 1.0.12 on rh 3.0 and rpm install complains [root@xxx ocfs-1.0.12]# rpm -Uvh * error: Failed dependencies: ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-hugemem-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 where can i find ocfs-support rpm?