similar to: ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not workwith RHEL 3errata kernel

From: John Smiley [mailto:pro_oracle@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:07 PM To: Wim Coekaerts Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: [Ocfs-users] ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not work with RHEL 3errata kernel Wim, ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.9-9.i686.rpm does not install when the errata kernel (2.4.21-4.0.1) is installed in RHEL 3. It complains

It does on my test phone. Is your tftp server available? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Brent Torrenga Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:39 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Notify cisco-check-cfg - Does it still workwith 8.2? Has anyone else noticed that

Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we

Hi all, Sorry to break in, but I find this thread a bit interesting. Jeram: I'm not very familiar with HP storage and cannot find too much info on the EVA 6000 array. Is it related to the EVA 5000 somehow, or is it a NAS array? In any case, how is the array configured. If the algorithm for hartbeat is as described earlier (36 sector reads and one write per second (per host???)) then you

Hello, I hope this mailing list is correct. I've a cluster pacemaker with a clone resource ocfs2 with ocfs2-tools-1.4.1-25.6.x86_64 ocfs2-tools-o2cb-1.4.1-25.6.x86_64 on Opensuse 11.2 After some network problem on my switch I receive on one of 4 nodes of my cluster the following messages Aug 18 13:12:28 nodo1 openais[8462]: [TOTEM] The token was lost in the OPERATIONAL state. Aug 18 13:12:28

Well, I've downloaded the kernel source code from http://mirror.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os /SRPMS/kernel-2.4.18-e.40.src.rpm and compiled it for x86 (i686). Is this kernel compatible with ocfs ?? __________________________________________ Mauro Staretz - MI Montreal Inform?tica Ltda Microsoft MCSE+I / MCDBA / MCP - Oracle OCP Tel: 55-21-2291-6116 R.2104

Wim, I opened a TAR on this issue, and was informed that async+ocfs is supported (as opposed to "works") as of 1.0.9-12. If this is not the case, then it sounds like there may be a miscommunication on the Oracle side. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 10:36 PM > To: Derek Suzuki > Cc:

Hi All Does anyone have information on OCFS compatibility with Legato. i.e Can we use Letato to backup directly from OCFS Volumes. Also does OCFS work with BCV. R'gds Varghese Abraham. -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com]On Behalf Of Wim Coekaerts Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 9:33 AM To: Andreas Piesk Cc:

Hi... I have a strange problem with my Private NIC Channel, here is my environment details : 1. RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Private NIC Channel: Broadcom BCM5700 My Private NIC channel is down intermittently, we just tracing the root of the problems by identify each product installed the

We are also thinking about locking for each read/write, but would its = overhead be too high? We have another idea that is extending the function of flock, lockf, = fcntl to distributed. So any application that need strict data consistent can do a lock = operation on the whole or part of the file. For ordinary application, maybe the current logic is enough. How about it? >-----Original

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is

Hello, I've successfully configured RAC on Redhat AS, with external firewire + ocfs. The whole process was done without any errors and have created the database. (Thanks to Wim Coekaerts useful article). But now, how do I actually use it? If I have a client making a connection, to which node do I connect? Are there also any recommended procedures to test RAC's capabilities? Thanks.

In order to get more information on IO performance problems I created the script below: #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s #pragma D option flowindent syscall::*write*:entry /pid == $1 && guard++ == 0/ { self -> ts = timestamp; self->traceme = 1; printf("fd: %d", arg0); } fbt::: /self->traceme/ { /* elapsd =timestamp - self -> ts; printf("

Dear all... Currently I am having 5 RAC nodes with Configurations as below : 1. HW = DL580 32 Bit Processor 2. OS = RHAS 2.1 3. OCFS= Latest Version 4. RAC= Oracle9i 9.2.0.5 (32 Bit) Now I am planning to add 2 more Rac Nodes in the existing RAC: 1. HW=Itanium 64 bit processor 2. OS=RHAS 3.0 3. OCFS=Latest Version 4. RAC=Oracle9i 9.2.0.5 (32 bit) Can I

Hi, Is this "Unresolved Symbols" issue only occurring on VMware with e.38? We have OCFS users want to update their kernel to e.34 or e.38 without VMware. Please advise, Thanks! Roger--- -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:20 PM To: Sunil Mushran Cc: ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: ENC: ENC:

=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com=20 >[mailto:ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Wim Coekaerts >Sent: 2004=C4=EA6=D4=C222=C8=D5 16:01 >To: Zhang, Sonic > >the problem is, how can we notify. I think we don't want to=20 >notify every >node on every change othewise we overload the interconnect and we don't

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Is the following statement still valid for either OCFS 1.0.9-12 or OCFS 1.0.11-1? The following is from one of the questions put forward by Derek Suzuki on Ocfs-users "A couple more minor questions about OCFS and RHEL3" > Next, I saw a Metalink thread which suggests that async I/O is not > supported on OCFS with RHAS 2.1. It doesn't say anything about RHEL3. > We've