similar to: [Patch] for bug 81

Hi Folks, We can see these massages on our MDS Feb 12 12:46:08 mds01 kernel: LDISKFS-fs warning (device dm-0): empty_dir: bad directory (dir #31452569) - no `.'' or `..'' Feb 12 12:46:08 mds01 kernel: LDISKFS-fs warning (device dm-0): ldiskfs_rmdir: empty directory has too many links (3) It seem to indicate that we have bad(corrupted) directory. Do you have any idea how to

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20101031/bb482d8d/attachment.html>

Hi, I recently upgraded one of my fileservers from 2.4.16 to 2.4.18 plus the ext3-cvs.patch that Andrew Morton pointed me to for addressing and assertion failure. Since then I have been getting lots of errors like: May 21 14:07:03 glass kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #2945366: rec_len %% 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1886221359, rec_len=24927,

In looking at this further, I?m not seeing how this can be configured as documented and still work. The sieve_pipe_socket_dir setting, as the documentation suggests, appears to be used by the plugin to construct a path to find the ?script? (the socket in this case), and it is always relative to base_dir and must include the contents of sieve_pipe_socket_dir. /* Try socket first */ if (

This is a 2.2.19 machine with ext3-0.0.7a and quota support running. The symptoms are a particular NFS export hangs (for linux clients but not Solaris clients?) the local filesystem gives the following: EXT3-fs warning (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 2213 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1563120916,

Hi, all I?m new to the list but not to dovecot. I?ve been using it in a basic configuration for some time, but finally decided to tweak my deployed system to take advantage of some more dovecot features. In particular I?m trying to set up pigeonhole to implement spam retraining with imapsieve. All of this is with dovecot 2.2.31 (65cde28) and pigeonhole 0.4.19. Before going any further let me

We are also thinking about locking for each read/write, but would its = overhead be too high? We have another idea that is extending the function of flock, lockf, = fcntl to distributed. So any application that need strict data consistent can do a lock = operation on the whole or part of the file. For ordinary application, maybe the current logic is enough. How about it? >-----Original

It's both in 2.6 and recent 2.6 (for RH ASS2.1 you'll probably need to copy the latest 2.4 defintion, but I don't care for obsolete junk). Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1014) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ /* get first two blocks */ for (i=0; i<2; i++) { - bhs[i] = getblk

Just wondering if someone could help me debug this: I was moving data from an ATARAID (via Promise FastTrack100 Controller) into the LVM device below: 58,1: # cat /proc/lvm/VGs/foo3/LVs/bar name: /dev/foo3/bar size: 476315648 access: 3 status: 1 number: 0 open: 1 allocation: 0 device: 58:01 # /sbin/pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes

After fix bug 130 and 131, and some LTP bugs. ocfs2 can now pass all LTP filesystem related system call testcases. detail result see attach. ------------------- Intel China Software Lab. iNet: 8-752-1243 8621-52574545-1243(O) xfling@users.sourceforge.net Opinions are my own and don't represent those of my employer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hello, I'm running Samba 3.6.6-1 on my x64 Arch Linux installation. I recently decided to have my samba share support NTFS's Alternate Data Streams by using streams_xattr or streams_depot. With streams_xattr I discovered that if I copy a file having an ADS from a win7 box, on the linux console, I can see the ADS as an xattr attached to the file. However when I copy the file back to my

Hi Ryan, I am not authenticating to any Windows server, I just have the samba server itself set up with 3 users who an login. ...Paul Ryan Frantz wrote: >Paul, > >Are you using a Windows PDC or ADS to authenticate your Samba shares? >If so, the problem would not be with Samba, but with the authenticating >server. > >Ryan > >-----Original Message----- >From:

add a hypercall number for virtual device in unmodified guest There are 6 patches for para-driver support in vmx guest. This is the first one. Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Ling <xiaofeng.ling@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com> diff -r 287d36b46fa3 xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S Tue Aug 30 20:36:49 2005 +++

The page_to_phys is defined as #define page_to_phys(page) (phys_to_machine(page_to_pseudophys(page))) so it return machine addresss while virt_to_phys return psedophys. include/asm-xen/asm-i386/io.h this is really confusing. why not define page_to_machine? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi, I have a question, If I start 2 or more guest linux, does the physical memory of code segment and readonly data segment be reused? What''s the relationship between the physical memory and the number of guest os that can create? xiaofeng ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT

We have test latest xen (ChangeSet 7646) on VT platform with Intel 915 chipset : The VMX can not be created for the known issue http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=388 <http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=382> But it is ok after adding xiaofeng''s patch. IA32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can startup XenU with different

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

Hi guy, I have recently encountered a problem while I was just trying to generate some random numbers with the function "rnorm", the problem is shown below: ########case 1############ > rnorm(20*0.2) [1] -1.2765922 -0.5732654 -1.2246126 -0.4734006 ########case 2########### *> rnorm(20*(1-0.8)) [1] -0.62036668 0.04211587 -0.91092165* #########case 3############ > a<-0.2 >

During our testing, we found this code path where xen attempts to grab the shadow_lock, while holding it - leading to a deadlock. >> free_dom_mem-> >> shadow_sync_and_drop_references-> >> shadow_lock -> ..................... first lock >> shadow_remove_all_access-> >> remove_all_access_in_page-> >> put_page-> >>

this doesn't do anything but noisy debug printks anymore Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1426) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -196,9 +196,7 @@ static struct super_operations ocfs_sops = { .statfs = ocfs_statfs, - .put_inode = ocfs_put_inode, .clear_inode = ocfs_clear_inode, - //put_inode =