similar to: Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

Dear all... Currently I am having 5 RAC nodes with Configurations as below : 1. HW = DL580 32 Bit Processor 2. OS = RHAS 2.1 3. OCFS= Latest Version 4. RAC= Oracle9i 9.2.0.5 (32 Bit) Now I am planning to add 2 more Rac Nodes in the existing RAC: 1. HW=Itanium 64 bit processor 2. OS=RHAS 3.0 3. OCFS=Latest Version 4. RAC=Oracle9i 9.2.0.5 (32 bit) Can I

Hello, I've successfully configured RAC on Redhat AS, with external firewire + ocfs. The whole process was done without any errors and have created the database. (Thanks to Wim Coekaerts useful article). But now, how do I actually use it? If I have a client making a connection, to which node do I connect? Are there also any recommended procedures to test RAC's capabilities? Thanks.

Hi all, Sorry to break in, but I find this thread a bit interesting. Jeram: I'm not very familiar with HP storage and cannot find too much info on the EVA 6000 array. Is it related to the EVA 5000 somehow, or is it a NAS array? In any case, how is the array configured. If the algorithm for hartbeat is as described earlier (36 sector reads and one write per second (per host???)) then you

Hi... I have a strange problem with my Private NIC Channel, here is my environment details : 1. RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Private NIC Channel: Broadcom BCM5700 My Private NIC channel is down intermittently, we just tracing the root of the problems by identify each product installed the

Dear Experts, One of our client wants to use OCFS for their 9i RAC(2 node) on RHEL3 and also use GFS on the nodes. Would there be any issues using OCFS for Oracle 9i RAC and using GFS for failing over things like print services on the same node? Has this been tested? I know these are competing products and OCFS 2.0is not an option now for the client. They need GFS for their custom apps. Any ideas

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Hello again. Our production cluster has begun experiencing some vicious slowdowns that may (or may not) be related to the filesystems. When the problem occurs, the load average on the servers jumps up to 30 or higher. Usually one node will climb while the other drops, then they will switch places a few minutes later. At one point, we had one node's load average up over 300. Our site

Hi, I am currently involved in a project with E-Business 11i.9. For the production enviroment, ct. wants to implement Load Balance and Fail Over - both middle tier and database tier, the last with RAC. As E11i creates lots of tablespaces, the best way seems to be OCFS. We installed & configured OCFS partitions. The next step was to install E11i multi tier, single instance - already

Hi All, we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000. ocfs version being used is $ rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 Database Version is 9.2.0.5 However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete. We initially assumed RAC is

Hi OCFS Gurus... I have 2 questions for OCFS ver 1.0.10.1 1. What is the Maximum mount point suggested if we are using OCFS ? 2. Is there any method to tune the OCFS to booster the IO performance? Awaiting ur responses... Thanks in Advance... Rgds/Jeram

(Yep, it's me again) We've worked around some minor glitches and now have a pair of nodes happily sharing an OCFS volume. I was wondering, though, if it was possible to configure a second private IP address so that the nodes could communicate over more than one Gigabit Ethernet connection. Our RAC books and online docs make some vague references to multiple interconnects, but I have yet

Hello again. I am setting up a new pair of servers to run RAC. They're connected via fibre-channel to a hardware RAID array, and both are able to see the exposed LUNs. When I create an OCFS filesystem on one node with mkfs.ocfs, I can mount it. When I try to mount from the other node, however, it fails. After that, the filesystem is left in a state where neither node can mount it. The

Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we

I'm preparing a pair of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 servers on which to test RAC. Currently they are running the 2.4.21-4.0.2 kernel. I saw that the 1.0.9-9 OCFS binaries are tied to the 4.0.1 kernel, and confirmed that myself. The 1.0.9-12 packages are dated a few days later and don't refer to a specific kernel version, so I assumed they would work with 4.0.2. However, when I try to

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to