Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches similar to: "add brick unsuccessful"
2011 Jan 09
1
gluster peer probe
Hello everyone,
So this is my first email here. Recently I have downloaded glusterfs-3.1 and
tried to install it on my four servers. I did not have any problems with the
installation, but the configuration is a little bit unclear to me. I would
like to ask you, if perhaps you had the same problems as I encountered and
if yes, then how did you resolve your problem ?
My configuration : 5 servers
2010 Oct 22
2
cannot create volume
hi
all guys!
I'm using glusterfs 3.10 now .I got 10 node to run gluster.I found a problem here:
[root at gluster-bak-1 /root]
#gluster volume create db-backup stripe 4 transport tcp gluster-bak-3:/data3 gluster-bak-4:/data4 gluster-bak-5:/data5 gluster-bak-6:/data6
Creation of volume db-backup has been unsuccessful
the volume cannot be created!
and I found the log in
2012 Dec 03
1
"gluster peer status" messed up
I have three machines, all Ubuntu 12.04 running gluster 3.3.1.
storage1 192.168.6.70 on 10G, 192.168.5.70 on 1G
storage2 192.168.6.71 on 10G, 192.168.5.71 on 1G
storage3 192.168.6.72 on 10G, 192.168.5.72 on 1G
Each machine has two NICs, but on each host, /etc/hosts lists the 10G
interface on all machines.
storage1 and storage3 were taken away for hardware changes, which included
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:50:20PM -0700, Andrew Trick wrote:
>
> > On Mar 26, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency)
> > at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get
> > the machine scheduler to intermix ALU
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
Hi,
I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency)
at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get
the machine scheduler to intermix ALU instructions with the loads to
effectively hide the latency.
It seems the issue is with load clustering. I restrict load clustering
to 4 at a time, but when I look at the debug output, the loads are
always being
2009 Feb 23
1
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
I have 2 models:
mop, has_and_belong_to_many :contacts
contact, has_and_belong_to_many :mops
when I save my mop Ii have the users coming in a an array:
["9",10"]
I am doing this to asscociate each one to a mop:
@contacts.each do |contact|
@mop.contacts << contact
end
Contact(#44950470) expected, got String(#20837400)
It is giving me the above error. Any ideas?
2018 May 31
1
Help About R-Package Portability
Hi,
I'm having an issue with R package configurations which I thought the
community would help me. I have two softwares written in R, DECoN and
panelcn.mops, and need to run both of them isolated. The problem is that I
couldn't install them onto neither the OS with the sudo permissions nor the
home folder of a specific user with the right permissions. What I need is
making them as
2019 Sep 10
2
MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the explanations. Yes AMDGPU is in-order and has
MicroOpBufferSize = 1.
Re "issue limited" and instruction groups: could it make sense to
disable the generic scheduler's detection of issue limitation on
in-order CPUs, or on CPUs that don't define instruction groups, or
some similar condition? Something like:
--- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp
+++
2018 Jun 01
0
Help About R-Package Portability
Your lack of permissions is highly operating-system-specific and local-policy-specific and therefore outside the scope of this mailing list... I suggest you have a conversation with your system administrator(s). Insuring the ability to run R code when the admin is not cooperating is not really something we can help with. (Some systems are configured to prevent any executables from running off
2019 Sep 09
2
Fwd: MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi,
I'm trying to understand why MachineScheduler does a poor job in
straight line code in cases like the one in the attached debug dump.
This is on AMDGPU, an in-order target, and the problem is that the
IMAGE_SAMPLE instructions have very high (80 cycle) latency, but in
the resulting schedule they are often placed right next to their uses
like this:
1784B %140:vgpr_32 =
2004 Jan 11
5
BSD-licensed IDS/IDP Software?
I seem to remember seeing somewhere (on this list/on the web -- don't
remember) that there was some ``Snort-like'' software that was available under
the BSD license. Unfortunately, I'm unable to find any information about such
software. Was I dreaming, or can anybody else jog my memory? :)
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
2020 Apr 03
0
Powercool PCRACK-1200VA patch update
Sorry about the noise guys.
Below a significantly improved patch.
The main difference is that all calls to usb_get_string_.. have been
wrapped in a new function nut_usb_get_string() that is implemented in
libusb.c
This was necessary in order to make the bufflen_fix available in
libusb.c where usb_get_string() is called in libusb_open()
This wrapper function mops up and hides all the work
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
>> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
>> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
2016 Nov 21
2
Winbind traffic not encrypted
A problem here getting winbind traffic to be encrypted using Kerberos.
I have set up a test environment with a pair of servers (actually lxc
containers):
- samba server (ubuntu 16.04, stock samba 4.3.11)
- client machine (ubuntu 16.04) joined with "net ads join" and winbind
The client machine has the following in /etc/samba/smb.conf:
-------
[global]
#netbios name = client-ad