similar to: Roadmap

with performance.readdir-ahead on on the volume maked folders on mounts invisible to ls command but it will show files fine it shows folders fine with ls on bricks what am I missing? maybe some settings are incompatible guess over-tuning happened vm1:/t1 /home/t1 glusterfs

I finally took some time to lay down a consolidated roadmap to the next major milestone (2.4), and some update on this. 1) new documentation (User and Developer Manuals) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the biggest change for 2.4. We will use the new test.networkupstools.org website to create and maintain the content, based upon the

On 06/16/2017 03:17 AM, te-yamauchi at usen.co.jp wrote: > It is componentized in Bug 1326219 and is not available by default. > What package should I install to use gnfs? > I can not find a package named glusterfs - gnfs. > It would help if we knew what distribution you're using. But I guess you're using CentOS? The CentOS Storage SIG packages were built without -gnfs by

Dear all Recently, i did some work to test small files performance for gnfsv3 transport. Following is my scenario. #####environment##### ==2 cluster nodes(nodeA/nodeB)== each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2 netcard nodeA: 10.254.3.77 10.128.3.77 nodeB: 10.254.3.78 10.128.3.78 ==2 stress nodes(clientA/clientB)== each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2

Hi Kaleb, Thanks, this refers to 3.11.x On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/03/2017 06:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Atin,

On 07/03/2017 06:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >> >> Hello Atin, >> >> I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using >> 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't

On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: > > Hello Atin, > > I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using > 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't working well. > > On 3.11 though I notice that gluster/nfs is really

It is componentized in Bug 1326219 and is not available by default. What package should I install to use gnfs? I can not find a package named glusterfs - gnfs. Thank you. -- Tetsuo

Hi Soumya, I just noticed some of the notes at the bottom. In particular * Till glusterfs-3.7, gluster-NFS (gNFS) gets enabled by default. The only requirement is that kernel-NFS has to be disabled for gluster-NFS to come up. Please disable kernel-NFS server and restart glusterd to start gNFS. In case of any issues with starting gNFS server, please look at

Do we have ACL support on nfs-ganesha? On Aug 30, 2017 3:08 PM, "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:59PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. > > Gluster/NFS (or gNFS) is the NFS-server that comes with GlusterFS. It is > a NFSv3 server and can only be used to export Gluster

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:59PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. Gluster/NFS (or gNFS) is the NFS-server that comes with GlusterFS. It is a NFSv3 server and can only be used to export Gluster volumes. You can enable it: - install the glusterfs-gnfs RPM (glusterfs >= 3.11) - the glusterfs-server RPM might contain the NFS-server (glusterfs

Hi, On 07/07/2017 06:16 AM, Pat Haley wrote: > > Hi All, > > A follow-up question. I've been looking at various pages on nfs-ganesha > & gluster. Is there a version of nfs-ganesha that is recommended for > use with > > glusterfs 3.7.11 built on Apr 27 2016 14:09:22 > CentOS release 6.8 (Final) For glusterfs 3.7, nfs-ganesha-2.3-* version can be used. I see

All, I am upgrading the storage cluster from 3.8 to 3.10 or 3.12. I have 3.12 on the ovirt cluster. I would like to change the client connection method to NFS/NFS-Ganesha as the FUSE method causes some issues with heavy python users (mmap errors on file open for write). I see that nfs-ganesha was dropped after 3.10 yet there is an updated version in the 3.12 repo for CentOS 7 (which I am

I have been trying to setup a Samba 2.2.6 server on FreeBSD 4.7. I want to use my NT4 domain for authentication of users. It looks like everything is setup properly as far as winbind is concerned, see below for results using wbinfo. I am still prompted for a password when trying to connect to the samba share. I cannot list the shares using "smbclient -L servername -Udomain+username"

http://dovecot.org/roadmap.html I'll try to keep it updated. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071230/4cfeacec/attachment-0002.bin>

I can't find any R roadmap. Is it available somewhere ? Etienne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Roadmap---tp21791647p21791647.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 21 Mar 2015, at 10:14, Florian Sager <sager at agitos.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > congrats to the merger with OX. > > Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has > only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support > to - maybe - increase the priority in your

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 22:14 +0200, Davy Defaud via samba wrote: > > So, what’s the current status now? I can see RODC and SUBDOMAIN on the > roadmap. > But, as there are not “FUNDED”, is there someone actually working on it? > If so, are they targeted for a particular version or just “when it’s ready”? RODC support has been funded as is pretty good as of 4.8. There are still some

Hi all... I'm looking once again at the Syslinux roadmap. It seems to me that we're going to have a very hard time making Syslinux 4.00 be the full-featured everything-in-C release I had hoped for, or perhaps more specifically, that it is justifiable to sit on the current filesystems-in-C code waiting for the rest. That would probably mean productizing the transitional COM32R module

Hi there, I'm very interested in oVirt as a management interface for a VM setup we're building, however it seems as though there isn't much info on the product roadmap or active development. I'm wondering if anyone could point me to more information on the roadmap or commit activity on the project? Regards, Anthony -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was