Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches similar to: "cannot create volume"
2011 Apr 20
1
add brick unsuccessful
Hi again,
I'm having trouble testing the add-brick feature. I'm using a
replicate 2 setup with currently 2 nodes in and am
trying to add 2 more. The command blocks for a bit until i get an "Add
Brick unsuccessful" message.
According to etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log below i can't seem to find
anything :
[2011-04-20 12:55:06.944593] I
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:50:20PM -0700, Andrew Trick wrote:
>
> > On Mar 26, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency)
> > at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get
> > the machine scheduler to intermix ALU
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
Hi,
I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency)
at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get
the machine scheduler to intermix ALU instructions with the loads to
effectively hide the latency.
It seems the issue is with load clustering. I restrict load clustering
to 4 at a time, but when I look at the debug output, the loads are
always being
2019 Sep 10
2
MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the explanations. Yes AMDGPU is in-order and has
MicroOpBufferSize = 1.
Re "issue limited" and instruction groups: could it make sense to
disable the generic scheduler's detection of issue limitation on
in-order CPUs, or on CPUs that don't define instruction groups, or
some similar condition? Something like:
--- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp
+++
2009 Feb 23
1
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
I have 2 models:
mop, has_and_belong_to_many :contacts
contact, has_and_belong_to_many :mops
when I save my mop Ii have the users coming in a an array:
["9",10"]
I am doing this to asscociate each one to a mop:
@contacts.each do |contact|
@mop.contacts << contact
end
Contact(#44950470) expected, got String(#20837400)
It is giving me the above error. Any ideas?
2018 May 31
1
Help About R-Package Portability
Hi,
I'm having an issue with R package configurations which I thought the
community would help me. I have two softwares written in R, DECoN and
panelcn.mops, and need to run both of them isolated. The problem is that I
couldn't install them onto neither the OS with the sudo permissions nor the
home folder of a specific user with the right permissions. What I need is
making them as
2019 Sep 09
2
Fwd: MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi,
I'm trying to understand why MachineScheduler does a poor job in
straight line code in cases like the one in the attached debug dump.
This is on AMDGPU, an in-order target, and the problem is that the
IMAGE_SAMPLE instructions have very high (80 cycle) latency, but in
the resulting schedule they are often placed right next to their uses
like this:
1784B %140:vgpr_32 =
2004 Jan 11
5
BSD-licensed IDS/IDP Software?
I seem to remember seeing somewhere (on this list/on the web -- don't
remember) that there was some ``Snort-like'' software that was available under
the BSD license. Unfortunately, I'm unable to find any information about such
software. Was I dreaming, or can anybody else jog my memory? :)
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2018 Jun 01
0
Help About R-Package Portability
Your lack of permissions is highly operating-system-specific and local-policy-specific and therefore outside the scope of this mailing list... I suggest you have a conversation with your system administrator(s). Insuring the ability to run R code when the admin is not cooperating is not really something we can help with. (Some systems are configured to prevent any executables from running off
2020 Apr 03
0
Powercool PCRACK-1200VA patch update
Sorry about the noise guys.
Below a significantly improved patch.
The main difference is that all calls to usb_get_string_.. have been
wrapped in a new function nut_usb_get_string() that is implemented in
libusb.c
This was necessary in order to make the bufflen_fix available in
libusb.c where usb_get_string() is called in libusb_open()
This wrapper function mops up and hides all the work
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
>> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
>> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction