similar to: cannot create volume

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches similar to: "cannot create volume"

2011 Apr 20
1
add brick unsuccessful
Hi again, I'm having trouble testing the add-brick feature. I'm using a replicate 2 setup with currently 2 nodes in and am trying to add 2 more. The command blocks for a bit until i get an "Add Brick unsuccessful" message. According to etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log below i can't seem to find anything : [2011-04-20 12:55:06.944593] I
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:50:20PM -0700, Andrew Trick wrote: > > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency) > > at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get > > the machine scheduler to intermix ALU
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
Hi, I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency) at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get the machine scheduler to intermix ALU instructions with the loads to effectively hide the latency. It seems the issue is with load clustering. I restrict load clustering to 4 at a time, but when I look at the debug output, the loads are always being
2019 Sep 10
2
MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi Andy, Thanks for the explanations. Yes AMDGPU is in-order and has MicroOpBufferSize = 1. Re "issue limited" and instruction groups: could it make sense to disable the generic scheduler's detection of issue limitation on in-order CPUs, or on CPUs that don't define instruction groups, or some similar condition? Something like: --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp +++
2009 Feb 23
1
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
I have 2 models: mop, has_and_belong_to_many :contacts contact, has_and_belong_to_many :mops when I save my mop Ii have the users coming in a an array: ["9",10"] I am doing this to asscociate each one to a mop: @contacts.each do |contact| @mop.contacts << contact end Contact(#44950470) expected, got String(#20837400) It is giving me the above error. Any ideas?
2018 May 31
1
Help About R-Package Portability
Hi, I'm having an issue with R package configurations which I thought the community would help me. I have two softwares written in R, DECoN and panelcn.mops, and need to run both of them isolated. The problem is that I couldn't install them onto neither the OS with the sudo permissions nor the home folder of a specific user with the right permissions. What I need is making them as
2019 Sep 09
2
Fwd: MachineScheduler not scheduling for latency
Hi, I'm trying to understand why MachineScheduler does a poor job in straight line code in cases like the one in the attached debug dump. This is on AMDGPU, an in-order target, and the problem is that the IMAGE_SAMPLE instructions have very high (80 cycle) latency, but in the resulting schedule they are often placed right next to their uses like this: 1784B %140:vgpr_32 =
2004 Jan 11
5
BSD-licensed IDS/IDP Software?
I seem to remember seeing somewhere (on this list/on the web -- don't remember) that there was some ``Snort-like'' software that was available under the BSD license. Unfortunately, I'm unable to find any information about such software. Was I dreaming, or can anybody else jog my memory? :) Kind regards, Devon H. O'Dell
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2018 Jun 01
0
Help About R-Package Portability
Your lack of permissions is highly operating-system-specific and local-policy-specific and therefore outside the scope of this mailing list... I suggest you have a conversation with your system administrator(s). Insuring the ability to run R code when the admin is not cooperating is not really something we can help with. (Some systems are configured to prevent any executables from running off
2020 Apr 03
0
Powercool PCRACK-1200VA patch update
Sorry about the noise guys. Below a significantly improved patch. The main difference is that all calls to usb_get_string_.. have been wrapped in a new function nut_usb_get_string()  that is implemented in libusb.c This was necessary in order to make the bufflen_fix available in libusb.c where usb_get_string() is called in libusb_open() This wrapper function mops up and hides all the work
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? >> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would >> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction