similar to: Managing backtrace

I have a spec: specify "a post with no user id should add a record" do post :edit_or_create, :user => {:login => ''joeschmoe'', :email => ''joe at shmoe.com'', :email_confirmation => ''joe at shmoe.com'', :full_name => ''Joe Schmoe''} assigns[:user].should_not_be_nil

Good morning (Pacific Time). I have a controller action that, as a side-effect, sends an email to an administrator. I want it to do something like this: specify "when someone successfully signs up, an email should be sent to the administrator with the person''s contact page" do post :signup, {...lots o'' params} response should_be success #

I have 2 identical AudioCodes MP-112s. They have the same config except for the SIP usernames/passwords and the device IP. The configs in extension.conf and sip.conf are also identical. On one box, when I pick up the phone, I get a fast busy and the logs/debug show an automatic hangup. On the other device, I can make calls without a problem. I can even call the phone that can't make a

from the pgsql configuration file: # Query to retrieve the password. # # The query should return one row, one column. If more than one row or column # is returned, authentication will automatically fail. # # Available substitutions: # %u = entire userid # %n = user part of user at domain # %d = domain part of user at domain # # Query to retrieve the user information. # # The query must

Hi As this '-R' command initially works fine I guess it must be a bug. I have to login at a computer which is hidden behind NAT. The user (joe) at the computer then connect to my server with the command: ssh -R 1234:localhost:22 test.com Then I login to test.com and connect back to joes computer: ssh -p 1234 localhost I get successfull connection every time but after a few

It took me a little while to figure out what was going on here ... We're trying to migrate a site from non-encrypted to encrypted passwords using the "update encrypted" option. Apparently, this causes problems when "username level" is set greater than zero (it's set to 15 in our implementation) We've been having a lot of problems when we turn on encrypted

I wanted to use ARTS to add RJS in a behaviour driven way to my application, but I''m having some trouble asserting a replace_html with a partial. I''ve created a pastie (http://pastie.caboo.se/60694) which contains the RJS I want to spec, the spec which I already wrote and its failure message. I''m currently using RSpec-0.9.2

Under AIX there are three security settings: expires = a fixed date at which an account is no longer valid maxage= weeks before a password expires maxexpires=max weeks during which a password can be changed by a user after expiration AFTER WHICH ACCESS IS NOT ALLOWED Beauty of maxage with expires is, that no manual intervention is required to block inactive users. With maxage=5 and expires=1 an

I have several plain ruby classes that do nothing but implement algorithms. What is the prefferred way to run these w/out making a DB connection every time? Thanks, Dennis Byrne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060724/5ff610dd/attachment.html

Hello all, I have a spec for a route that used to pass under Rails 2.2.2 and rspec 1.1.12, but can?t figure out what is wrong since I updated. Here is the assertion: route_for( { :controller => ''purchase_orders'', :action => ''update'', :company_id => "32", :id

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019, Joe Gervasio wrote: > This question undermines my reading of the documentation.  I had thought that > these were separate things:  > >     SHUTDOWNCMD "/sbin/shutdown -u -h +1"  >     NOTIFYCMD /opt/local/sbin/upssched > > I had assumed that the SHUTDOWNCMD would be used by the Nut client (upsmon) to > shutdown the slave system,  and that

Thanks to all who attended! Joe Julian to host our next one at 25 April, 15:00 UTC. https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings has our agenda, feel free to add topics! =========================================================== #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Meeting - 11 April 2018 ============================================================ Meeting started by amye at 15:01:43 UTC. The

Hello, I've been using OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 for quite some time at work. We have a firewall, and I had no problems connecting to external machines. Today my machine was updated to version 4.1p1 and it has a problem. When I try to make an SSH2 connection to an external machine, everything seems to work right up to the very end: debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey) debug1: channel

Hello I use the Linksys 3102 to connect Asterisk to a POTS line, and XLite on XP as an SIP client: http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/1421/3102asteriskxlitecid.png The problem is that by default, Asterisk doesn't rewrite the CID name + number in incoming calls, so that XLite displays whatever name I used in the 3102 and the extension the 3102 uses to register with Asterisk. How can I tell

Hello, For some time now have been trying to connect a Samba-3.0.14a-0.4 server running on SuSE Ent 9 linux server to our Exchange 2003 (running on Server 2003 Std w/ SP1) server which is also the AD server for our domain. I can connect to the shares using the AD as the authentication source, so the basic functionality is there but some command output does not show in the way i expect

> On 9 Jun 2019, at 21:19, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: > Using upssched and a upssched-cmd script to shut down the system is an alternative to using the builtin upsmon SHUTDOWNCMD on status [OB LB]. A upssched-cmd script can provide a managed shutdown well before [OB LB] is reached, but should the UPS reach that status upsmon's SHUTDOWNCMD will take over and

Hi, I have recently installed shorewall with a very simple rules configuration, ---------------------------------- #SECTION RELATED SECTION NEW Ping/ACCEPT all $FW Trcrt/ACCEPT all $FW SSH/ACCEPT all $FW ACCEPT net $FW tcp http #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE ----------------------------------------- and I have no

I'd like comments (suggestions, improvements, messages that start with "you moron you forgot that. . .") on the following horrible dirty kludge to make a (nearly, with any luck) un-hackable set of shares available to specific users on the internet. On the Server, initially all packets bound for port 139 are rejected as the default policy. The server is connected to the internet full

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote: > would. As I mentioned, I've seen reports of ISOHybrids that didn't boot in DD > mode, but that seemed to work using the Rufus process. And you will always be > limited by what the "automated process" that is the ISOHybrid algorithm can > do (which can of course be modified by a developer, but so can Rufus'

Hello again. Question as in topic. Thanks in advance.