similar to: mtime handling seems generally buggy for directories

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "mtime handling seems generally buggy for directories"

2017 Aug 20
3
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph
2017 Nov 06
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:37:11 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2017, at 12.55, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: Sorry to say this setup works flawlessly for years. The only > > addition we will make now is to do the delivery with dovecot-lda. > > Everything else (including multiple dovecot pop/imap
2017 Nov 03
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:53:47 +0200 (EET) Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On November 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM Stephan von Krawczynski > > <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical > > hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage.
2017 Nov 06
3
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > wrote: > > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > > would implement a new param for
2017 Nov 05
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 10:44:25 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2017, at 10.31, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 > > Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the
2017 Nov 20
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process > > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and everything worked > > pretty well. We had no problems
2017 Nov 03
3
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
Hello, we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage. Now we would like to use dovecot-lda on the smtp host, so we wonder if the lda binary works without starting dovecot from init. As there will be no POP3/IMAP usage on this host it seems unnecessary. Nevertheless we cannot judge if it is still needed for
2013 Apr 08
5
How to see folders/subfolders/emails through imap
Hello all, I am trying to do something very simple - at least thats what I thought. I have some fs, it contains folders and subfolders with email files ordered like maildir. Now I try to set up dovecot on top simply to let some imap account watch these email files. But I cannot see any folders at all. I can create new folders and see them, but I cannot create subfolders as subdirs like
2017 Nov 04
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> > >> While it might be possible to disable all the other services except > >> master I must ask why? How would the users be accessing their mails then? > >> > >> Sami > > > > Hello Sami, > > > > you did not read my first post. We
2017 Aug 20
6
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) > Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> >>>> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >>>> written in pure
2017 Nov 07
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:19:23 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 9.15, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > > > >> mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > >>
2016 Mar 13
3
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > zfs set sync=disabled ? > > Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure. I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you shouldn't host email services anyway. -- Regards, Stephan
2017 Nov 07
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > > don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's > boxes though > > eg: > > mail_location = > maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY > > --
2017 Nov 20
1
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >
2017 Aug 18
3
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >> written in pure shell script, so no python dependencies. >> https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh > > Thanks - I might look at that, but as Ralph mentions in his reply - > Let's encrypt certs are only for three months - never ending circus.
2010 Oct 21
1
Some client problems with TCP-only NFS in Gluster 3.1
I see that the built-in NFS support registers mountd in portmap only with tcp and not udp. While this makes sense for a TCP-only NFS implementation, it does cause problems for some clients: Ubuntu 10.04 and 7.04 mount just fine. Ubuntu 8.04 gives "requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported", unless you specify "-o mountproto=tcp" as a mount option, in
2015 May 20
2
Re-install libwrap in OpenSSH
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Michael Stone <mstone at mathom.us> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> Show me this as an example of your firewall skills and replace this >> hosts.allow entry: >> >> sshd: .... : spawn (echo -e "%u@%h[%a] on `/bin/date`" to %d connected >> me | >>
2017 Aug 10
4
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
> On 10 August 2017, at 04:37, Alef Veld <alefveld at outlook.com> wrote: > > I completely agree (having said that I'm pretty new to all this so I might be full of it). > > You should run your own CA if you have an active financial interest in your company (say your the owner). No added benefit to have your certificate certified by a third party, why would they care
2008 Sep 15
5
fixing user, group, and mtime with rsync?
Hi all. I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync) by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files). Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files was copied incorrectly. Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:
2008 Aug 29
1
maildir, zlib and mtime/internal date
On the wiki: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib I think there should be a step 5.0. along the lines of "get and remember the original message file's mtime" And a step 5.4 like "Using the touch command or some other method, set the now compressed message's mtime back to the mtime of the original message file." To preserve the message's internal time in case